Suppr超能文献

未经治 BRAF 野生型晚期黑色素瘤患者接受纳武利尤单抗治疗的生存结局:一项随机 3 期试验的 3 年随访。

Survival Outcomes in Patients With Previously Untreated BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy: Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

机构信息

Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.

Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):187-194. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4514.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

This analysis provides long-term follow-up in patients with BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma receiving first-line therapy based on anti-programmed cell death 1 receptor inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the 3-year survival with nivolumab vs that with dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This follow-up of a randomized phase 3 trial analyzed 3-year overall survival data from the randomized, controlled, double-blind CheckMate 066 phase 3 clinical trial. For this ongoing, multicenter academic institution trial, patients were enrolled from January 2013 through February 2014. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with confirmed unresectable previously untreated stage III or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 but without a BRAF mutation.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxic events with nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks).

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

Overall survival.

RESULTS

At minimum follow-ups of 38.4 months among 210 participants in the nivolumab group (median age, 64 years [range, 18-86 years]; 57.6% male) and 38.5 months among 208 participants in the dacarbazine group (median age, 66 years [range, 25-87 years]; 60.1% male), 3-year overall survival rates were 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1%-57.9%) and 21.6% (95% CI, 16.1%-27.6%), respectively. The median overall survival was 37.5 months (95% CI, 25.5 months-not reached) in the nivolumab group and 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.6-13.0 months) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59; P < .001). Complete and partial responses, respectively, were reported for 19.0% (40 of 210) and 23.8% (50 of 210) of patients in the nivolumab group compared with 1.4% (3 of 208) and 13.0% (27 of 208) of patients in the dacarbazine group. Additional analyses were performed on outcomes with subsequent therapies. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 15.0% (31 of 206) of nivolumab-treated patients and in 17.6% (36 of 205) of dacarbazine-treated patients. There were no deaths due to study drug toxic effects.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Nivolumab led to improved 3-year overall survival vs dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01721772.

摘要

重要性

本分析提供了 BRAF 野生型晚期黑色素瘤患者接受抗程序性死亡 1 受体抑制剂一线治疗的长期随访结果。

目的

比较纳武单抗与达卡巴嗪治疗未经治疗的 BRAF 野生型晚期黑色素瘤患者的 3 年生存率。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项随机 3 期临床试验的随访,分析了随机、对照、双盲 CheckMate 066 3 期临床试验的 3 年总生存数据。对于这项正在进行的多中心学术机构试验,患者于 2013 年 1 月至 2014 年 2 月期间入组。纳入标准为年龄 18 岁或以上,确诊为无法切除的未经治疗的 III 或 IV 期黑色素瘤,东部合作肿瘤组体能状态为 0 或 1,但无 BRAF 突变。

干预措施

患者接受纳武单抗(每 2 周 3 mg/kg 加每 3 周达卡巴嗪匹配安慰剂)或达卡巴嗪(每 3 周 1000 mg/m2 加每 2 周纳武单抗匹配安慰剂)治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性事件。

主要观察指标

总生存。

结果

在纳武单抗组 210 例患者(中位年龄 64 岁[范围 18-86 岁];57.6%为男性)和达卡巴嗪组 208 例患者(中位年龄 66 岁[范围 25-87 岁];60.1%为男性)中,最低随访时间分别为 38.4 个月和 38.5 个月,3 年总生存率分别为 51.2%(95%CI,44.1%-57.9%)和 21.6%(95%CI,16.1%-27.6%)。纳武单抗组的中位总生存期为 37.5 个月(95%CI,25.5 个月-未达到),达卡巴嗪组为 11.2 个月(95%CI,9.6-13.0 个月)(风险比,0.46;95%CI,0.36-0.59;P < .001)。纳武单抗组分别有 19.0%(40/210)和 23.8%(50/210)的患者报告完全缓解和部分缓解,而达卡巴嗪组分别有 1.4%(3/208)和 13.0%(27/208)的患者报告完全缓解和部分缓解。随后的治疗结果进行了额外的分析。纳武单抗治疗组 15.0%(31/206)和达卡巴嗪治疗组 17.6%(36/205)的患者发生了与治疗相关的 3/4 级不良事件。没有因研究药物毒性而死亡的病例。

结论和相关性

与达卡巴嗪相比,纳武单抗可改善未经治疗的 BRAF 野生型晚期黑色素瘤患者的 3 年总生存率。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01721772。

相似文献

3
Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
7
Five-Year Outcomes With Nivolumab in Patients With Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma.
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 20;38(33):3937-3946. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00995. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Melanoma Vaccines: Comparing Novel Adjuvant Treatments in High-Risk Patients.
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jun 19;13(6):656. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13060656.
2
A Consolidated Review of Contemporary Targeted and Immunotherapeutic Options for Melanoma.
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 5;13(6):1388. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061388.
4
Financial burden of high-cost immunotherapy among cancer survivors in Medicare.
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01797-2.
5
6
7
Immuno-oncological Challenges and Chemoresistance in Veterinary Medicine: Probiotics as a New Strategic Tool.
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025 Feb 15. doi: 10.1007/s12602-025-10468-8.
9
Selective deficiency of mitochondrial respiratory complex I subunits Ndufs4/6 causes tumor immunogenicity.
Nat Cancer. 2025 Feb;6(2):323-337. doi: 10.1038/s43018-024-00895-x. Epub 2025 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1345-1356. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
5
PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assays for Lung Cancer: Results from Phase 1 of the Blueprint PD-L1 IHC Assay Comparison Project.
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):208-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.2228. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
8
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030. Epub 2015 May 31.
9
Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma.
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2006-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414428. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
10
Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2521-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093. Epub 2015 Apr 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验