Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):187-194. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4514.
This analysis provides long-term follow-up in patients with BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma receiving first-line therapy based on anti-programmed cell death 1 receptor inhibitors.
To compare the 3-year survival with nivolumab vs that with dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This follow-up of a randomized phase 3 trial analyzed 3-year overall survival data from the randomized, controlled, double-blind CheckMate 066 phase 3 clinical trial. For this ongoing, multicenter academic institution trial, patients were enrolled from January 2013 through February 2014. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with confirmed unresectable previously untreated stage III or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 but without a BRAF mutation.
Patients were treated until progression or unacceptable toxic events with nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks).
Overall survival.
At minimum follow-ups of 38.4 months among 210 participants in the nivolumab group (median age, 64 years [range, 18-86 years]; 57.6% male) and 38.5 months among 208 participants in the dacarbazine group (median age, 66 years [range, 25-87 years]; 60.1% male), 3-year overall survival rates were 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1%-57.9%) and 21.6% (95% CI, 16.1%-27.6%), respectively. The median overall survival was 37.5 months (95% CI, 25.5 months-not reached) in the nivolumab group and 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.6-13.0 months) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.36-0.59; P < .001). Complete and partial responses, respectively, were reported for 19.0% (40 of 210) and 23.8% (50 of 210) of patients in the nivolumab group compared with 1.4% (3 of 208) and 13.0% (27 of 208) of patients in the dacarbazine group. Additional analyses were performed on outcomes with subsequent therapies. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 15.0% (31 of 206) of nivolumab-treated patients and in 17.6% (36 of 205) of dacarbazine-treated patients. There were no deaths due to study drug toxic effects.
Nivolumab led to improved 3-year overall survival vs dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01721772.
本分析提供了 BRAF 野生型晚期黑色素瘤患者接受抗程序性死亡 1 受体抑制剂一线治疗的长期随访结果。
比较纳武单抗与达卡巴嗪治疗未经治疗的 BRAF 野生型晚期黑色素瘤患者的 3 年生存率。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项随机 3 期临床试验的随访,分析了随机、对照、双盲 CheckMate 066 3 期临床试验的 3 年总生存数据。对于这项正在进行的多中心学术机构试验,患者于 2013 年 1 月至 2014 年 2 月期间入组。纳入标准为年龄 18 岁或以上,确诊为无法切除的未经治疗的 III 或 IV 期黑色素瘤,东部合作肿瘤组体能状态为 0 或 1,但无 BRAF 突变。
患者接受纳武单抗(每 2 周 3 mg/kg 加每 3 周达卡巴嗪匹配安慰剂)或达卡巴嗪(每 3 周 1000 mg/m2 加每 2 周纳武单抗匹配安慰剂)治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性事件。
总生存。
在纳武单抗组 210 例患者(中位年龄 64 岁[范围 18-86 岁];57.6%为男性)和达卡巴嗪组 208 例患者(中位年龄 66 岁[范围 25-87 岁];60.1%为男性)中,最低随访时间分别为 38.4 个月和 38.5 个月,3 年总生存率分别为 51.2%(95%CI,44.1%-57.9%)和 21.6%(95%CI,16.1%-27.6%)。纳武单抗组的中位总生存期为 37.5 个月(95%CI,25.5 个月-未达到),达卡巴嗪组为 11.2 个月(95%CI,9.6-13.0 个月)(风险比,0.46;95%CI,0.36-0.59;P < .001)。纳武单抗组分别有 19.0%(40/210)和 23.8%(50/210)的患者报告完全缓解和部分缓解,而达卡巴嗪组分别有 1.4%(3/208)和 13.0%(27/208)的患者报告完全缓解和部分缓解。随后的治疗结果进行了额外的分析。纳武单抗治疗组 15.0%(31/206)和达卡巴嗪治疗组 17.6%(36/205)的患者发生了与治疗相关的 3/4 级不良事件。没有因研究药物毒性而死亡的病例。
与达卡巴嗪相比,纳武单抗可改善未经治疗的 BRAF 野生型晚期黑色素瘤患者的 3 年总生存率。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01721772。