Derry Sheena, Bell Rae Frances, Straube Sebastian, Wiffen Philip J, Aldington Dominic, Moore R Andrew
Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LE.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 23;1(1):CD007076. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007076.pub3.
This review updates part of an earlier Cochrane Review titled "Pregabalin for acute and chronic pain in adults", and considers only neuropathic pain (pain from damage to nervous tissue). Antiepileptic drugs have long been used in pain management. Pregabalin is an antiepileptic drug used in management of chronic pain conditions.
To assess the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of pregabalin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase for randomised controlled trials from January 2009 to April 2018, online clinical trials registries, and reference lists.
We included randomised, double-blind trials of two weeks' duration or longer, comparing pregabalin (any route of administration) with placebo or another active treatment for neuropathic pain, with participant-reported pain assessment.
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality and biases. Primary outcomes were: at least 30% pain intensity reduction over baseline; much or very much improved on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale (moderate benefit); at least 50% pain intensity reduction; or very much improved on PGIC (substantial benefit). We calculated risk ratio (RR) and number needed to treat for an additional beneficial (NNTB) or harmful outcome (NNTH). We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE.
We included 45 studies lasting 2 to 16 weeks, with 11,906 participants - 68% from 31 new studies. Oral pregabalin doses of 150 mg, 300 mg, and 600 mg daily were compared with placebo. Postherpetic neuralgia, painful diabetic neuropathy, and mixed neuropathic pain predominated (85% of participants). High risk of bias was due mainly to small study size (nine studies), but many studies had unclear risk of bias, mainly due to incomplete outcome data, size, and allocation concealment.Postherpetic neuralgia: More participants had at least 30% pain intensity reduction with pregabalin 300 mg than with placebo (50% vs 25%; RR 2.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 to 2.6); NNTB 3.9 (3.0 to 5.6); 3 studies, 589 participants, moderate-quality evidence), and more had at least 50% pain intensity reduction (32% vs 13%; RR 2.5 (95% CI 1.9 to 3.4); NNTB 5.3 (3.9 to 8.1); 4 studies, 713 participants, moderate-quality evidence). More participants had at least 30% pain intensity reduction with pregabalin 600 mg than with placebo (62% vs 24%; RR 2.5 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.2); NNTB 2.7 (2.2 to 3.7); 3 studies, 537 participants, moderate-quality evidence), and more had at least 50% pain intensity reduction (41% vs 15%; RR 2.7 (95% CI 2.0 to 3.5); NNTB 3.9 (3.1 to 5.5); 4 studies, 732 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Somnolence and dizziness were more common with pregabalin than with placebo (moderate-quality evidence): somnolence 300 mg 16% versus 5.5%, 600 mg 25% versus 5.8%; dizziness 300 mg 29% versus 8.1%, 600 mg 35% versus 8.8%.Painful diabetic neuropathy: More participants had at least 30% pain intensity reduction with pregabalin 300 mg than with placebo (47% vs 42%; RR 1.1 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.2); NNTB 22 (12 to 200); 8 studies, 2320 participants, moderate-quality evidence), more had at least 50% pain intensity reduction (31% vs 24%; RR 1.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.5); NNTB 22 (12 to 200); 11 studies, 2931 participants, moderate-quality evidence), and more had PGIC much or very much improved (51% vs 30%; RR 1.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.0); NNTB 4.9 (3.8 to 6.9); 5 studies, 1050 participants, moderate-quality evidence). More participants had at least 30% pain intensity reduction with pregabalin 600 mg than with placebo (63% vs 52%; RR 1.2 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.4); NNTB 9.6 (5.5 to 41); 2 studies, 611 participants, low-quality evidence), and more had at least 50% pain intensity reduction (41% vs 28%; RR 1.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.7); NNTB 7.8 (5.4 to 14); 5 studies, 1015 participants, low-quality evidence). Somnolence and dizziness were more common with pregabalin than with placebo (moderate-quality evidence): somnolence 300 mg 11% versus 3.1%, 600 mg 15% versus 4.5%; dizziness 300 mg 13% versus 3.8%, 600 mg 22% versus 4.4%.Mixed or unclassified post-traumatic neuropathic pain: More participants had at least 30% pain intensity reduction with pregabalin 600 mg than with placebo (48% vs 36%; RR 1.2 (1.1 to 1.4); NNTB 8.2 (5.7 to 15); 4 studies, 1367 participants, low-quality evidence), and more had at least 50% pain intensity reduction (34% vs 20%; RR 1.5 (1.2 to 1.9); NNTB 7.2 (5.4 to 11); 4 studies, 1367 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Somnolence (12% vs 3.9%) and dizziness (23% vs 6.2%) were more common with pregabalin.Central neuropathic pain: More participants had at least 30% pain intensity reduction with pregabalin 600 mg than with placebo (44% vs 28%; RR 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0); NNTB 5.9 (4.1 to 11); 3 studies, 562 participants, low-quality evidence) and at least 50% pain intensity reduction (26% vs 15%; RR 1.7 (1.2 to 2.3); NNTB 9.8 (6.0 to 28); 3 studies, 562 participants, low-quality evidence). Somnolence (32% vs 11%) and dizziness (23% vs 8.6%) were more common with pregabalin.Other neuropathic pain conditions: Studies show no evidence of benefit for 600 mg pregabalin in HIV neuropathy (2 studies, 674 participants, moderate-quality evidence) and limited evidence of benefit in neuropathic back pain or sciatica, neuropathic cancer pain, or polyneuropathy.Serious adverse events, all conditions: Serious adverse events were no more common with placebo than with pregabalin 300 mg (3.1% vs 2.6%; RR 1.2 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.7); 17 studies, 4112 participants, high-quality evidence) or pregabalin 600 mg (3.4% vs 3.4%; RR 1.1 (95% CI 0.8 to 1.5); 16 studies, 3995 participants, high-quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence shows efficacy of pregabalin in postherpetic neuralgia, painful diabetic neuralgia, and mixed or unclassified post-traumatic neuropathic pain, and absence of efficacy in HIV neuropathy; evidence of efficacy in central neuropathic pain is inadequate. Some people will derive substantial benefit with pregabalin; more will have moderate benefit, but many will have no benefit or will discontinue treatment. There were no substantial changes since the 2009 review.
本综述更新了早期Cochrane系统评价“普瑞巴林用于成人急慢性疼痛”的部分内容,且仅考虑神经性疼痛(因神经组织损伤引起的疼痛)。抗癫痫药物长期以来一直用于疼痛管理。普瑞巴林是一种用于管理慢性疼痛状况的抗癫痫药物。
评估普瑞巴林治疗成人慢性神经性疼痛的镇痛效果和不良反应。
我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库、MEDLINE和Embase,以查找2009年1月至2018年4月期间的随机对照试验、在线临床试验注册库及参考文献列表。
我们纳入了为期两周或更长时间的随机、双盲试验,比较普瑞巴林(任何给药途径)与安慰剂或其他治疗神经性疼痛的活性药物,并采用参与者报告的疼痛评估方法。
两位综述作者独立提取数据,并评估试验质量和偏倚。主要结局为:疼痛强度较基线降低至少30%;在患者总体印象变化量表(PGIC)上有很大或非常大的改善(中度获益);疼痛强度降低至少50%;或在PGIC上有非常大的改善(显著获益)。我们计算了风险比(RR)以及为获得额外有益结局(NNTB)或有害结局(NNTH)所需治疗的患者数。我们使用GRADE评估证据质量。
我们纳入了45项持续2至16周的研究,共11906名参与者,其中68%来自31项新研究。将每日口服150mg、300mg和600mg的普瑞巴林与安慰剂进行了比较。带状疱疹后神经痛、糖尿病性疼痛性神经病变和混合性神经性疼痛占主导(85%的参与者)。偏倚风险高主要是由于研究规模小(9项研究),但许多研究的偏倚风险不明确,主要是由于结局数据不完整、研究规模和分配隐藏问题。
与安慰剂相比,服用300mg普瑞巴林的参与者中,疼痛强度降低至少30%的比例更高(50%对25%;RR 2.1(95%置信区间(CI)1.6至2.6);NNTB 3.9(3.0至5.6);3项研究,589名参与者,中等质量证据),且疼痛强度降低至少50%的比例更高(32%对13%;RR 2.5(95%CI 1.9至3.4);NNTB 5.3(3.9至8.1);4项研究,713名参与者,中等质量证据)。与安慰剂相比,服用600mg普瑞巴林的参与者中,疼痛强度降低至少30%的比例更高(62%对24%;RR 2.5(95%CI 2.0至3.2);NNTB 2.7(2.2至3.7);3项研究,537名参与者,中等质量证据),且疼痛强度降低至少50%的比例更高(41%对15%;RR 2.7(95%CI 2.0至3.5);NNTB 3.9(3.1至5.5);4项研究,732名参与者,中等质量证据)。与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林引起的嗜睡和头晕更为常见(中等质量证据):300mg时嗜睡发生率为16%对5.5%,600mg时为25%对5.8%;头晕发生率300mg时为29%对8.1%,600mg时为35%对8.8%。
与安慰剂相比,服用300mg普瑞巴林的参与者中,疼痛强度降低至少30%的比例更高(47%对42%;RR 1.1(95%CI 1.01至1.2);NNTB 22(12至200);8项研究,2320名参与者,中等质量证据),疼痛强度降低至少50%的比例更高(31%对24%;RR 1.3(95%CI 1.2至1.5);NNTB 22(12至200);11项研究,2931名参与者,中等质量证据),且PGIC有很大或非常大改善的比例更高(51%对30%;RR 1.8(95%CI 1.5至2.0);NNTB 4.9(3.8至6.9);5项研究,1050名参与者,中等质量证据)。与安慰剂相比,服用600mg普瑞巴林的参与者中,疼痛强度降低至少30%的比例更高(63%对52%;RR 1.2(95%CI 1.04至1.4);NNTB 9.6(5.5至41);2项研究,611名参与者,低质量证据),疼痛强度降低至少50%的比例更高(41%对28%;RR 1.4(95%CI 1.2至1.7);NNTB 7.8(5.4至14);5项研究,1015名参与者,低质量证据)。与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林引起的嗜睡和头晕更为常见(中等质量证据):300mg时嗜睡发生率为11%对3.1%,600mg时为15%对4.5%;头晕发生率300mg时为13%对3.8%,600mg时为22%对4.4%。
与安慰剂相比,服用600mg普瑞巴林的参与者中,疼痛强度降低至少30%的比例更高(48%对36%;RR 1.2(1.1至1.4);NNTB 8.2(5.7至15);4项研究,1367名参与者,低质量证据),且疼痛强度降低至少50%的比例更高(34%对20%;RR 1.5(1.2至1.9);NNTB 7.2(5.4至11);4项研究,1367名参与者,中等质量证据)。普瑞巴林引起的嗜睡(12%对3.9%)和头晕(23%对6.2%)更为常见。
与安慰剂相比,服用600mg普瑞巴林的参与者中,疼痛强度降低至少30%的比例更高(44%对28%;RR 1.6(1.3至2.0);NNTB 5.9(4.1至11);3项研究,562名参与者,低质量证据),且疼痛强度降低至少50%的比例更高(26%对15%;RR 1.7(1.2至2.3);NNTB 9.8(6.0至28);3项研究,562名参与者,低质量证据)。普瑞巴林引起的嗜睡(32%对11%)和头晕(23%对8.6%)更为常见。
研究表明,600mg普瑞巴林对HIV相关性神经病变无获益证据(2项研究,674名参与者,中等质量证据),对神经性背痛或坐骨神经痛、神经性癌痛或多发性神经病的获益证据有限。
严重不良事件在安慰剂组和300mg普瑞巴林组中同样不常见(3.1%对2.6%;RR 1.2(95%CI 0.8至1.7);17项研究,4112名参与者,高质量证据),在安慰剂组和600mg普瑞巴林组中同样不常见(3.4%对3.4%;RR 1.1(95%CI 0.8至1.5);16项研究,3995名参与者,高质量证据)。
证据表明普瑞巴林对带状疱疹后神经痛、糖尿病性疼痛性神经病变以及混合性或未分类的创伤后神经性疼痛有效,对HIV相关性神经病变无效;对中枢性神经性疼痛的有效性证据不足。一些人使用普瑞巴林将获得显著获益;更多人将有中度获益,但许多人将无获益或会停止治疗。自2009年的综述以来没有实质性变化。