Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Department of Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations. Marseille, France; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Inserm UMR1068, CNRS UMR7258, Marseille, France.
Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Department of Multidisciplinary Oncology and Therapeutic Innovations. Marseille, France.
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Jun;14(6):1095-1101. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
KRAS mutation is the most frequent molecular alteration found in advanced NSCLC; it is associated with a poor prognosis without available targeted therapy. Treatment options for NSCLC have been recently enriched by the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and data about its efficacy in patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC are discordant. This study assessed the routine efficacy of ICIs in advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC.
In this retrospective study, clinical data were extracted from the medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs and with available molecular analysis between April 2013 and June 2017. Analysis of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was performed if exploitable tumor material was available.
A total of 282 patients with ICI-treated (in the first line or more) advanced NSCLC (all histological subgroups) who were treated with ICIs (anti-programmed death 1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 antibodies), including 162 (57.4%) with KRAS mutation, 27 (9.6%) with other mutations, and 93 (33%) with a wild-type phenotype, were identified. PD-L1 analysis was available for 128 patients (45.4%), of whom 45.3% and 19.5% had PD-L1 expression of 1% or more and 50%, respectively (49.5% and 21.2%, respectively, in the case of the 85 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC). No significant difference was seen in terms of objective response rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival between KRAS-mutant NSCLC and other NSCLC. No significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival were observed between the major KRAS mutation subtypes (G12A, G12C, G12D, G12V, and G13C). In KRAS-mutant NSCLC, unlike in non-KRAS-mutant NSCLC, the efficacy of ICIs is consistently higher, even though not statistically significant, for patients with PD-L1 expression in 1% or more of tumor cells than for those with PD-L1 expression in less than 1% of tumor cells, and this finding is especially true when PD-L1 expression is high (PD-L1 expression ≥50%).
For patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC (all mutational subtypes), the efficacy of ICI is similar to that for patients with other types of NSCLC. PD-L1 expression seems to be more relevant for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in KRAS-mutant NSCLC than it is in other types of NSCLC.
KRAS 突变是晚期 NSCLC 中最常见的分子改变;它与预后不良相关,目前尚无可用的靶向治疗方法。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的发展丰富了 NSCLC 的治疗选择,而关于其在 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 患者中的疗效的数据存在差异。本研究评估了 ICI 在晚期 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 中的常规疗效。
本回顾性研究从 2013 年 4 月至 2017 年 6 月接受 ICI 治疗且具有可用分子分析的晚期 NSCLC 患者的病历中提取临床数据。如果可利用肿瘤材料,则进行程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达分析。
共确定了 282 名接受 ICI 治疗(一线或以上)的晚期 NSCLC(所有组织学亚组)患者,这些患者接受了 ICI(抗程序性死亡 1、抗 PD-L1 或抗细胞毒性 T 淋巴细胞相关蛋白 4 抗体)治疗,其中 162 名(57.4%)存在 KRAS 突变,27 名(9.6%)存在其他突变,93 名(33%)存在野生型表型。对 128 名患者(45.4%)进行了 PD-L1 分析,其中 45.3%和 19.5%的 PD-L1 表达分别为 1%或更高和 50%,在 85 名 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 患者中分别为 49.5%和 21.2%。KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 与其他 NSCLC 患者在客观缓解率、无进展生存期或总生存期方面无显著差异。在主要 KRAS 突变亚型(G12A、G12C、G12D、G12V 和 G13C)之间,总生存期或无进展生存期无显著差异。在 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 中,与非 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 不同,即使无统计学意义,对于肿瘤细胞中 PD-L1 表达为 1%或更高的患者,ICI 的疗效始终更高,而对于肿瘤细胞中 PD-L1 表达低于 1%的患者,这种疗效甚至更明显,而对于 PD-L1 表达较高(PD-L1 表达≥50%)的患者尤其如此。
对于 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC(所有突变亚型)患者,ICI 的疗效与其他类型 NSCLC 患者相似。与其他类型的 NSCLC 相比,PD-L1 表达似乎更能预测 KRAS 突变型 NSCLC 中 ICI 的疗效。