Department of Anesthesiology, Næstved Hospital, Næstved, Denmark.
Department of Anesthesiology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, Copenhagen, Denmark.
JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):562-571. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.22039.
Multimodal postoperative analgesia is widely used but lacks evidence of benefit.
Investigate beneficial and harmful effects of 4 nonopioid analgesics regimens.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, 4-group trial in 6 Danish hospitals with 90-day follow-up that included 556 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) from December 2015 to October 2017. Final date of follow-up was January 1, 2018.
Participants were randomized to receive paracetamol (acetaminophen) 1000 mg plus ibuprofen 400 mg (n = 136; PCM + IBU), paracetamol 1000 mg plus matched placebo (n = 142; PCM), ibuprofen 400 mg plus matched placebo (n = 141; IBU), or half-strength paracetamol 500 mg plus ibuprofen 200 mg (n = 140; HS-PCM + IBU) orally every 6 hours for 24 hours postoperatively, starting 1 hour before surgery.
Two co-primary outcomes: 24-hour morphine consumption using patient-controlled analgesia in pairwise comparisons between the 4 groups (multiplicity-adjusted thresholds for statistical significance, P < .0042; minimal clinically important difference, 10 mg), and proportion of patients with 1 or more serious adverse events (SAEs) within 90 days (multiplicity-adjusted thresholds for statistical significance, P < .025).
Among 559 randomized participants (mean age, 67 years; 277 [50%] women), 556 (99.5%) completed the trial and were included in the analysis. Median 24-hour morphine consumption was 20 mg (99.6% CI, 0-148) in the PCM + IBU group, 36 mg (99.6% CI, 0-166) for PCM alone, 26 mg (99.6% CI, 2-139) for IBU alone, and 28 mg (99.6% CI, 2-145) for HS-PCM + IBU. The median difference in morphine consumption between the PCM + IBU group vs PCM alone was 16 mg (99.6% CI, 6.5 to 24; P < .001); for the PCM-alone group vs HS-PCM + IBU, 8 mg (99.6% CI, -1 to 14; P = .001); and for the PCM + IBU group vs IBU alone, 6 mg (99.6% CI, -2 to 16; P = .002). The difference in morphine consumption was not statistically significant for the PCM + IBU group vs HS-PCM + IBU (8 mg [99.6% CI, -2 to 16]; P = .005) or for the PCM-alone group vs IBU alone (10 mg [99.6% CI, -2 to 16]; P = .004) after adjustment for multiple comparisons and 2 co-primary outcomes. There was no significant difference between the IBU-alone group vs HS-PCM + IBU (2 mg [99.6% CI, -10 to 7]; P = .81). The proportion of patients with SAEs in groups receiving IBU was 15%, and in the PCM-alone group, was 11%. The relative risk of SAE was 1.44 (97.5% CI, 0.79 to 2.64; P = .18).
Among patients undergoing THA, paracetamol plus ibuprofen significantly reduced morphine consumption compared with paracetamol alone in the first 24 hours after surgery; there was no statistically significant increase in SAEs in the pooled groups receiving ibuprofen alone vs with paracetamol alone. However, the combination did not result in a clinically important improvement over ibuprofen alone, suggesting that ibuprofen alone may be a reasonable option for early postoperative oral analgesia.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02571361.
重要性:多模式术后镇痛应用广泛,但缺乏获益的证据。
目的:调查 4 种非阿片类镇痛药方案的有益和有害效果。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在丹麦 6 家医院进行的、为期 90 天随访的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、4 组试验,纳入了 556 例接受全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者。最终随访日期为 2018 年 1 月 1 日。
干预措施:参与者被随机分配接受扑热息痛(对乙酰氨基酚)1000mg 加布洛芬 400mg(PCM+IBU 组)、扑热息痛 1000mg 加匹配安慰剂(PCM 组)、布洛芬 400mg 加匹配安慰剂(IBU 组)或半强度扑热息痛 500mg 加布洛芬 200mg(HS-PCM+IBU 组),每 6 小时口服 1 次,共 24 小时,从手术前 1 小时开始。
主要结局和测量:2 个主要复合结局:4 组间 24 小时吗啡消耗量的比较(统计学意义的多重调整阈值,P<.0042;最小临床重要差异,10mg)和 90 天内 1 个或更多严重不良事件(SAE)的患者比例(统计学意义的多重调整阈值,P<.025)。
结果:在 559 名随机参与者中(平均年龄 67 岁;277 [50%] 为女性),556 名(99.5%)完成了试验并纳入了分析。PCM+IBU 组 24 小时吗啡消耗量中位数为 20mg(99.6%CI,0-148),PCM 组为 36mg(99.6%CI,0-166),IBU 组为 26mg(99.6%CI,2-139),HS-PCM+IBU 组为 28mg(99.6%CI,2-145)。PCM+IBU 组与 PCM 组相比,吗啡消耗量的中位数差异为 16mg(99.6%CI,6.5 至 24;P<.001);PCM 组与 HS-PCM+IBU 组相比,8mg(99.6%CI,-1 至 14;P=.001);PCM+IBU 组与 IBU 组相比,6mg(99.6%CI,-2 至 16;P=.002)。PCM+IBU 组与 HS-PCM+IBU 组(8mg[99.6%CI,-2 至 16];P=.005)或 PCM 组与 IBU 组(10mg[99.6%CI,-2 至 16];P=.004)之间的吗啡消耗差异无统计学意义,经多重比较和 2 个主要结局调整后。IBU 组与 HS-PCM+IBU 组(2mg[99.6%CI,-10 至 7];P=.81)之间差异无统计学意义。接受 IBU 治疗的患者中 SAE 的比例为 15%,而在单独接受 PCM 治疗的患者中,该比例为 11%。SAE 的相对风险为 1.44(97.5%CI,0.79 至 2.64;P=.18)。
结论和相关性:在接受 THA 的患者中,与单独使用扑热息痛相比,扑热息痛加布洛芬在手术后 24 小时内显著减少了吗啡的消耗;单独使用布洛芬的患者中,SAE 的发生率并没有显著增加。然而,与单独使用布洛芬相比,联合治疗并没有导致临床重要的改善,这表明单独使用布洛芬可能是一种合理的早期术后口服镇痛选择。
试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02571361。