Suppr超能文献

化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂用于晚期非小细胞肺癌患者一线治疗的系统评价和基于文献的Meta分析

Chemotherapy in Combination With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Literature-Based Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Addeo Alfredo, Banna Giuseppe Luigi, Metro Giulio, Di Maio Massimo

机构信息

Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Division of Medical Oncology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2019 Apr 16;9:264. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00264. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy have shown superiority compared to chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). To evaluate the relative benefit in term of Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-free Survival (PFS) of checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone, overall and in subgroups defined by PDL1 expression we have performed a meta-analysis. This meta-analysis searched PubMed and checked references of the selected English language articles to identify further eligible trials. Data collection for this study took place from October 1 to October 24, 2018. In total, 8 trials involving 4,646 patients with advanced NSCLC, 3.314 (71%) and 1.332 (29%) with a non-squamous and squamous histology, respectively, were included in this meta-analysis. Four trials used atezolizumab, 3 pembrolizumab, and 1 nivolumab, accounting for 2.985 (64%), 1.298 (28%), and 363 (8%) of patients, respectively. The patients were randomized to receive first-line chemotherapy plus a checkpoint inhibitor vs. first-line chemotherapy, 2,978 patients for the OS endpoint and first-line chemotherapy plus a checkpoint inhibitor vs. first-line chemotherapy, 1,740 patients in the PFS endpoint. Checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy were associated with prolonged OS, compared with chemotherapy in the ITT population (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.87; = 0.0002, with significant heterogeneity among trials). Notably within the PDL1 low group (1-49) there was a significant heterogeneity ( = 0.06) between type of drug and efficacy: the combination of chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab showed an OS benefit (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.78; < 0.00007) unlike the atezolizumab backbone trials (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62-1.37; < 0.69). However, checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy were associated with prolonged PFS in the ITT (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.56-0.66; < 0.00001) and across PDL1 subgroups. Checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy, are associated with significantly prolonged OS and PFS in first-line therapy in NSCLC. In the low PDL1 subgroups the benefit was statistically significant only in the pembrolizumab backbone trials. The findings of this meta-analysis could assist in the design and interpretation of future trials and in economic analyses.

摘要

与单纯化疗相比,检查点抑制剂联合铂类化疗作为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗已显示出优越性。为了评估检查点抑制剂联合化疗与单纯化疗相比在总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)方面的相对获益,我们在总体以及根据程序性死亡受体配体1(PDL1)表达定义的亚组中进行了一项荟萃分析。该荟萃分析检索了PubMed并查阅了所选英文文章的参考文献,以确定更多符合条件的试验。本研究的数据收集于2018年10月1日至10月24日进行。本荟萃分析共纳入了8项试验,涉及4646例晚期NSCLC患者,其中非鳞状和鳞状组织学患者分别为3314例(71%)和1332例(29%)。4项试验使用阿特珠单抗,3项使用帕博利珠单抗,1项使用纳武利尤单抗,分别占患者的2985例(64%)、1298例(28%)和363例(8%)。患者被随机分配接受一线化疗加检查点抑制剂与一线化疗,2978例患者用于OS终点,1740例患者用于PFS终点。与ITT人群中的化疗相比,检查点抑制剂联合化疗与OS延长相关(风险比[HR],0.74;95%置信区间[CI],0.64 - 0.87;P = 0.0002,试验间存在显著异质性)。值得注意的是,在PDL1低表达组(1%-49%)中,药物类型与疗效之间存在显著异质性(P = 0.06):化疗加帕博利珠单抗的联合治疗显示出OS获益(HR,0.56;95% CI,0.40 - 0.78;P < 0.00007),这与以阿特珠单抗为主的试验不同(HR,0.92;95% CI,0.62 - 1.37;P < 0.69)。然而,检查点抑制剂联合化疗与ITT人群中的PFS延长相关(HR,0.61;95% CI,0.56 - 0.66;P < 0.00001),且在各PDL1亚组中均如此。与化疗相比,检查点抑制剂联合化疗在NSCLC一线治疗中与显著延长的OS和PFS相关。在低PDL1亚组中,仅在以帕博利珠单抗为主的试验中,该获益具有统计学意义。本荟萃分析的结果可有助于未来试验的设计和解读以及经济分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8557/6478036/a2a8447ebc05/fonc-09-00264-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验