Usmani Saad Zafar, Schjesvold Fredrik, Oriol Albert, Karlin Lionel, Cavo Michele, Rifkin Robert M, Yimer Habte Aragaw, LeBlanc Richard, Takezako Naoki, McCroskey Robert Donald, Lim Andrew Boon Ming, Suzuki Kenshi, Kosugi Hiroshi, Grigoriadis George, Avivi Irit, Facon Thierry, Jagannath Sundar, Lonial Sagar, Ghori Razi Uddin, Farooqui Mohammed Z H, Marinello Patricia, San-Miguel Jesus
Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Oslo Myeloma Center, Oslo University Hospital and KG Jebsen Center for B-Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lancet Haematol. 2019 Sep;6(9):e448-e458. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30109-7. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Lenalidomide and dexamethasone has been a standard of care in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The addition of a third drug to the combination is likely to improve treatment efficacy. KEYNOTE-185 assessed the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and dexamethasone with and without pembrolizumab in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. Here, we present the results of an unplanned interim analysis done to assess the benefit-risk of the combination at the request of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
KEYNOTE-185 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial done at 95 medical centres across 15 countries (Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Russia, South Africa, Spain, UK, and USA). Transplantation-ineligible patients aged 18 years and older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and who were treatment naive were enrolled, and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone using an interactive voice or integrated web response system. Patients received oral lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21 and oral dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of repeated 28-day cycles, with or without intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was investigator-assessed because of early trial termination. Efficacy was analysed in all randomly assigned patients and safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02579863, and it is closed for accrual.
Between Jan 7, 2016, and June 9, 2017, 301 patients were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone group (n=151) or the lenalidomide and dexamethasone group (n=150). On July 3, 2017, the FDA decided to halt the study because of the imbalance in the proportion of death between groups. At database cutoff (June 2, 2017), with a median follow-up of 6·6 months (IQR 3·4-9·6), 149 patients in the pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone group and 145 in the lenalidomide and dexamethasone group had received their assigned study drug. Median progression-free survival was not reached in either group; progression-free survival estimates at 6-months were 82·0% (95% CI 73·2-88·1) versus 85·0% (76·8-90·5; hazard ratio [HR] 1·22; 95% CI 0·67-2·22; p=0·75). Serious adverse events were reported in 81 (54%) patients in the pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone group versus 57 (39%) patients in the lenalidomide and dexamethasone group; the most common serious adverse events were pneumonia (nine [6%]) and pyrexia (seven [5%]) in the pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone group and pneumonia (eight [6%]) and sepsis (two [1%]) in the lenalidomide and dexamethasone group. Six (4%) treatment-related deaths occurred in the pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone group (cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, myocarditis, large intestine perforation, pneumonia, and pulmonary embolism) and two (1%) in the lenalidomide and dexamethasone group (upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage and respiratory failure).
The results from this unplanned, FDA-requested, interim analysis showed that the benefit-risk profile of pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is unfavourable for patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated multiple myeloma. Long-term safety and survival follow-up is ongoing.
Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc (Kenilworth, NJ, USA).
来那度胺和地塞米松一直是新诊断的不适于移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的标准治疗方案。添加第三种药物可能会提高治疗效果。KEYNOTE-185评估了来那度胺和地塞米松联合或不联合帕博利珠单抗在既往未治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效和安全性。在此,我们根据美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的要求,展示了一项旨在评估联合用药的获益-风险的非计划中期分析结果。
KEYNOTE-185是一项在15个国家(澳大利亚、加拿大、法国、德国、爱尔兰、以色列、意大利、日本、新西兰、挪威、俄罗斯、南非、西班牙、英国和美国)的95个医学中心进行的随机、开放标签的3期试验。纳入年龄18岁及以上、新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0或1且未接受过治疗、不适于移植的患者,并使用交互式语音或综合网络应答系统将其按1:1随机分配,分别接受帕博利珠单抗加利那度胺和地塞米松或单独的来那度胺和地塞米松治疗。患者在重复的28天周期的第1 - 21天口服来那度胺25mg,在第1、8、1第15和22天口服地塞米松40mg,联合或不联合每3周静脉注射帕博利珠单抗200mg。主要终点是无进展生存期,由于试验提前终止,由研究者评估。在所有随机分配的患者中分析疗效,在所有接受至少一剂研究药物的患者中分析安全性。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT02579863,现已停止入组。
在2016年1月7日至2017年6月9日期间,301例患者被随机分配到帕博利珠单抗加利那度胺和地塞米松组(n = 151)或来那度胺和地塞米松组(n = 150)。2017年7月3日,FDA因组间死亡比例失衡决定停止该研究。在数据截止时(2017年6月2日),中位随访时间为六个月(四分位距3.4 - 9.6),帕博利珠单抗加利那度胺和地塞米松组有149例患者、来那度胺和地塞米松组有145例患者接受了分配的研究药物。两组均未达到中位无进展生存期;6个月时的无进展生存期估计值分别为82.0%(95%CI 73.2 - 88.1)和85.0%(76.8 - 90.5);风险比(HR)为1.22;95%CI 0.67 - 2.22;p = 0.75。帕博利珠单抗加利那度胺和地塞米松组81例(54%)患者和来那度胺和地塞米松组57例(39%)患者报告了严重不良事件;帕博利珠单抗加利那度胺和地塞米松组最常见的严重不良事件是肺炎(9例[6%])和发热(7例[5%]),来那度胺和地塞米松组是肺炎(8例[6%])和脓毒症(2例[1%])。帕博利珠单抗加利那度胺和地塞米松组有6例(4%)与治疗相关的死亡(心脏骤停、心力衰竭、心肌炎、大肠穿孔、肺炎和肺栓塞),来那度胺和地塞米松组有2例(1%)(上消化道出血和呼吸衰竭)。
这项根据FDA要求进行的非计划中期分析结果表明,对于新诊断的、既往未治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者,帕博利珠单抗加利那度胺和地塞米松的获益-风险状况不佳。长期安全性和生存随访正在进行中。
默克公司(美国新泽西州肯尼沃思)的子公司默克雪兰诺公司。