Sánchez-Ríos Juan Pedro, García-Klepzig J L, Manu Chris, Ahluwalia Raju, Lüdemann Claas, Meloni Marco, Lacopi Elisabetta, De Buruaga Víctor Rodriguez-Saenz, Bouillet Benjamin, Vouillarmet Julien, Lázaro-Martínez José Luis, Van Acker Kristien
Diabetic Foot Unit, Vascular Surgery Department, Foundation Alcorcon University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Internal Medicine Department, San Carlos Clinic Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
J Wound Care. 2019 Aug 1;28(Sup8):S4-S14. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup8.S4.
This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of patients, including demographics, medical history and treatment, with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) during their first follow-up visit to a general practitioner (GP).
A two-part quantitative online questionnaire was distributed among GPs in France, UK, Germany and Spain. Part one entailed a survey of GPs' perceptions of referrals for DFU. Part two collected data on recently managed DFU cases. The percentage of responses was compared for each question and across the four countries for significant differences.
In part one of the study, 600 questionnaires were collected (150 per country) and 1188 patients managed for a DFU were included in the second part. About 88% of patients had type 2 diabetes, with a significant proportion of suboptimal control (average HbA1c: 10.64mmol/l). A patient complaint led to diagnosis in 60% of the cases. Wounds were found to be more frequently located in the toes and midfoot, and were superficial (according to the Texas Wound Classification system) in 80% of the cases. More than two-thirds of patients developed small wounds (<5cm); more than half of them had infected wounds. Approximately 50% of wounds were ischaemic, which triggered the onset of a DFU. Follow-up wound examinations before and after hospitalisation were performed by nurses, except in Germany where GPs undertook this role, including prescribing offloading devices and in the UK where follow-up was managed by podiatrists. Ischaemia, wound necrosis, suspected osteomyelitis and absence of wound healing were the primary reasons for hospital admission during the first month after diagnosis.
Delay in specialised foot care is a recurring topic in the treatment of DFUs, even with different health-care structures across Europe. Knowledge and education on DFUs should be reinforced among GPs and nurses to establish a global DFU care network between primary and specialised care, avoid hospitalisation and adequately manage high-risk patients.
本研究旨在分析糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者首次随访全科医生(GP)时的特征,包括人口统计学、病史和治疗情况。
向法国、英国、德国和西班牙的全科医生发放了一份两部分的定量在线问卷。第一部分对全科医生对DFU转诊的看法进行了调查。第二部分收集了近期处理的DFU病例的数据。对每个问题的回答百分比以及四个国家之间的回答百分比进行比较,以找出显著差异。
在研究的第一部分,收集了600份问卷(每个国家150份),第二部分纳入了1188例接受DFU治疗的患者。约88%的患者患有2型糖尿病,其中很大一部分控制不佳(平均糖化血红蛋白:10.64mmol/l)。60%的病例是因患者主诉而确诊。伤口更常见于脚趾和中足,80%的病例为表浅伤口(根据德州伤口分类系统)。超过三分之二的患者出现小伤口(<5cm);其中一半以上有感染伤口。约50%的伤口存在缺血,这引发了DFU的发生。除德国由全科医生进行住院前后的伤口检查(包括开具减压装置处方)以及英国由足病医生进行随访外,其他国家均由护士进行随访伤口检查。缺血、伤口坏死、疑似骨髓炎和伤口未愈合是诊断后第一个月内住院的主要原因。
即使欧洲各地的医疗保健结构不同,专科足部护理延迟仍是DFU治疗中反复出现的问题。应加强全科医生和护士对DFU的知识和教育,以建立初级护理和专科护理之间的全球DFU护理网络,避免住院并妥善管理高危患者。