Laboratory of Virology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; Infectious Diseases Division, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laboratory of Virology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; Infectious Diseases Division, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jun;26(6):706-712. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.12.013. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing is a key component for the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections. Current meningitis and encephalitis management guidelines agree on the need for CSF molecular testing in combination with other direct and indirect biological testing, both in CSF and blood. Multiplex molecular tests have been developed to reduce turnaround times and facilitate the diagnostic approach.
We aim to discuss the role of multiplex molecular panels in the management of CNS infections.
The MEDLINE database and the grey literature have been searched for relevant articles.
New molecular multiplex panels are being developed to simultaneously detect a large array of neuropathogens in CSF. Although one of these assays has been US Food and Drug Administration-approved, extensive analytical and clinical validation is still missing, and suboptimal performance related issues have been raised. Its use has been associated with decreased costs, reduced length of hospital stay and reduced antiviral therapy administration in retrospective, industry-sponsored studies. The pros and cons of this multiplex syndromic approach are discussed in this narrative review.
Molecular multiplex CNS infection diagnosis panels have been developed and present several attractive features, including ease of use and low turnaround time. However, suboptimal analytical performances render these tests difficult to use without additional confirmatory tests. Such panels are not comprehensive nor adapted to all situations, depending on the epidemiological or clinical context. Overall, available data in the literature currently do not support the use of a multiplex PCR panel in clinical routine as a 'stand-alone' molecular assay. Except in restricted laboratory capacity settings where such easy-to-use multiplex panels offer the diagnostic means that would otherwise not be available, the stepwise testing approach remains a more rational option. Serological testing both in blood and CSF should not be neglected, but it represents essential complementary tools regarding some neuropathogens.
脑脊液 (CSF) 检测是诊断中枢神经系统 (CNS) 感染的关键组成部分。目前的脑膜炎和脑炎管理指南都同意需要 CSF 分子检测,与其他直接和间接的生物检测相结合,无论是在 CSF 还是血液中。已经开发了多重分子检测来减少周转时间并促进诊断方法。
我们旨在讨论多重分子面板在 CNS 感染管理中的作用。
对 MEDLINE 数据库和灰色文献进行了搜索,以查找相关文章。
新的分子多重面板正在开发中,以同时检测 CSF 中的大量神经病原体。虽然其中一种检测方法已获得美国食品和药物管理局的批准,但仍缺乏广泛的分析和临床验证,并且提出了性能不佳的相关问题。在回顾性、行业赞助的研究中,这种多重综合征方法的使用与降低成本、缩短住院时间和减少抗病毒治疗管理有关。在这篇叙述性综述中讨论了这种多重方法的优缺点。
已经开发了用于 CNS 感染诊断的分子多重面板,具有易用性和周转时间短等优点。然而,分析性能不佳使得这些测试在没有额外的确认测试的情况下难以使用。这些测试既不全面也不适应所有情况,这取决于流行病学或临床背景。总的来说,目前文献中的可用数据不支持在临床常规中使用多重 PCR 面板作为“独立”分子检测。除了在限制实验室能力的情况下,这种易于使用的多重面板提供了否则无法获得的诊断手段外,逐步测试方法仍然是更合理的选择。血液和 CSF 中的血清学检测都不应被忽视,但对于某些神经病原体来说,这是必不可少的补充工具。