University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Hospital Nacional Professor Alejandro Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jun 1;37(11):1291-1299. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5599. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Globally, intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring use in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is inconsistent and susceptible to resource limitations and clinical philosophies. For situations without monitoring, there is no published comprehensive management algorithm specific to identifying and treating suspected intracranial hypertension (SICH) outside of the one ad hoc Imaging and Clinical Examination (ICE) protocol in the Benchmark Evidence from South American Trials: Treatment of Intracranial Pressure (BEST:TRIP) trial. As part of an ongoing National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported project, a consensus conference involving 43 experienced Latin American Intensivists and Neurosurgeons who routinely care for sTBI patients without ICP monitoring, refined, revised, and augmented the original BEST:TRIP algorithm. Based on BEST:TRIP trial data and pre-meeting polling, 11 issues were targeted for development. We used Delphi-based methodology to codify individual statements and the final algorithm, using a group agreement threshold of 80%. The resulting CREVICE (Consensus REVised ICE) algorithm defines SICH and addresses both general management and specific treatment. SICH treatment modalities are organized into tiers to guide treatment escalation and tapering. Treatment schedules were developed to facilitate targeted management of disease severity. A decision-support model, based on the group's combined practices, is provided to guide this process. This algorithm provides the first comprehensive management algorithm for treating sTBI patients when ICP monitoring is not available. It is intended to provide a framework to guide clinical care and direct future research toward sTBI management. Because of the dearth of relevant literature, it is explicitly consensus based, and is provided solely as a resource (a "consensus-based curbside consult") to assist in treating sTBI in general intensive care units in resource-limited environments.
全球范围内,在严重创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)中使用颅内压(ICP)监测存在不一致性,容易受到资源限制和临床理念的影响。对于没有监测的情况,除了 Benchmark Evidence from South American Trials: Treatment of Intracranial Pressure(BEST:TRIP)试验中的临时成像和临床检查(ICE)协议之外,没有发表专门针对识别和治疗疑似颅内高压(SICH)的综合管理算法。作为美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)支持的一个正在进行的项目的一部分,一次涉及 43 名经验丰富的拉丁美洲重症监护医生和神经外科医生的共识会议,他们经常护理没有 ICP 监测的 sTBI 患者,对最初的 BEST:TRIP 算法进行了细化、修订和扩充。基于 BEST:TRIP 试验数据和会前投票,确定了 11 个需要开发的问题。我们使用基于 Delphi 的方法对个体陈述和最终算法进行编码,使用 80%的小组一致同意阈值。由此产生的 CREVICE(共识修订的 ICE)算法定义了 SICH,并解决了一般管理和具体治疗问题。SICH 治疗方式被组织成不同层次,以指导治疗升级和逐渐减少。治疗方案的制定旨在促进疾病严重程度的靶向管理。根据小组的综合实践,提供了一个决策支持模型来指导这一过程。当 ICP 监测不可用时,该算法为治疗 sTBI 患者提供了第一个全面的管理算法。它旨在提供一个框架来指导临床护理,并指导未来针对 sTBI 管理的研究。由于相关文献的缺乏,该算法明确基于共识,仅作为资源(“共识型路边咨询”)提供,以协助资源有限的环境中的一般重症监护病房治疗 sTBI。