Suppr超能文献

两种商用多次呼吸氮洗脱装置在健康儿童和成人中的肺清除指数及功能残气量差异。

Differences in lung clearance index and functional residual capacity between two commercial multiple-breath nitrogen washout devices in healthy children and adults.

作者信息

Zwitserloot Annelies M, van den Born Evelyne J, Raaijmakers Lena H A, Stalman Wouter E, van Smaalen Marjanne, van den Berge Maarten, Gappa Monika, Koppelman Gerard H, Willemse Brigitte W M

机构信息

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Dept of Paediatric Pulmonology and Paediatric Allergy, Groningen, The Netherlands.

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2020 Jun 29;6(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00247-2019. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Multiple-breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) and its clinical parameter lung clearance index (LCI) are gaining increasing attention for the assessment of small airway function. Measurement of LCI relies on accurate assessment of functional residual capacity (FRC). The EasyOne Pro LAB (ndd) and Exhalyzer D (EM) are two commercially available MBNW devices. The aim of the study was to compare these two devices and in healthy subjects with regard to FRC, LCI and secondary outcome parameters and to relate FRC to FRC measured by body plethysmography (pleth) and helium dilution technique. MBNW measurements were performed using a lung model (FRC between 500 and 4000 mL) and in 38 subjects aged 6-65 years followed by helium dilution and pleth using fixed and relaxed breathing techniques. accuracy within 5% of lung model FRC was 67.3% for ndd, FRC was >5% higher for EM in all tests. , FRC ranged from 1.2 to 5.6 L. Mean differences (limits of agreement) between FRC and FRC were -7.0%, (-23.2 to 9.2%) and 5.7% (-11.2 to 22.6%) using ndd and EM, respectively. FRC was consistently lower than FRC (-11.8% (-25.6 to 2%)). LCI was comparable between the two devices (-1.3% (-21.9 to 19.3%)). There was a difference of >10 % in LCI in 12 of 38 subjects. Using the most recent software updates, both devices show relevant deviations in FRC measurement both and and individual differences in LCI in a significant proportion of subjects. The devices are therefore not interchangeable.

摘要

多次呼吸氮洗脱(MBNW)及其临床参数肺清除指数(LCI)在评估小气道功能方面越来越受到关注。LCI的测量依赖于对功能残气量(FRC)的准确评估。EasyOne Pro LAB(ndd)和Exhalyzer D(EM)是两种市面上可买到的MBNW设备。本研究的目的是比较这两种设备在健康受试者中FRC、LCI及次要结局参数方面的差异,并将FRC与通过体容积描记法(体描)和氦稀释技术测得的FRC进行关联。使用肺模型(FRC在500至4000 mL之间)对38名6至65岁的受试者进行MBNW测量,随后使用固定呼吸和放松呼吸技术进行氦稀释和体描测量。ndd测量肺模型FRC时,在5%范围内的准确率为67.3%,在所有测试中EM测得的FRC均高出5%以上。FRC范围为1.2至5.6 L。使用ndd和EM时,FRC与FRC之间的平均差异(一致性界限)分别为-7.0%(-23.2至9.2%)和5.7%(-11.2至22.6%)。FRC始终低于FRC(-11.8%(-25.6至2%))。两种设备的LCI具有可比性(-1.3%(-21.9至19.3%))。38名受试者中有12名的LCI差异>10%。使用最新软件更新后,两种设备在FRC测量方面均显示出相关偏差,且在相当比例的受试者中LCI存在个体差异。因此,这两种设备不可互换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验