Suppr超能文献

基于唾液的新型 COVID-19 检测:与当前的鼻咽拭子或咽喉拭子检测相比,它的效果如何?

New COVID-19 saliva-based test: How good is it compared with the current nasopharyngeal or throat swab test?

机构信息

Department of Medical Research, Division of Translational Research, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

Department of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

J Chin Med Assoc. 2020 Oct;83(10):891-894. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000396.

Abstract

As of April 15, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration has granted emergency use authorization to a first saliva test for diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, the device developed by RUCDR Infinite Biologics laboratory, Rutgers University. A key feature that distinguishes the saliva-based test from nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal (throat) swabs is that this kit allows self-collection and can spare healthcare professionals to be at risk during collecting nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal samples, thereby preserving personal protective equipment for use in patient care rather than sampling and testing. Consequently, broader testing than the current methods of nasal or throat swabs will significantly increase the number of people screening, leading to more effective control of the spread of COVID-19. Nonetheless, a comparison of saliva-based assay with current swab test is needed to understand what and how we can benefit from this newly developed assay. Therefore, in this mini-review article, we aimed to summarize the current and emerging tools, focusing on diagnostic power of different clinical sampling and specimens.

摘要

截至 2020 年 4 月 15 日,美国食品和药物管理局已授予 RUCDR Infinite Biologics 实验室(罗格斯大学)开发的用于诊断严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 感染的首个唾液检测试剂紧急使用授权。与鼻咽或口咽(喉咙)拭子相比,基于唾液的检测的一个关键特征是,该试剂盒允许自我采集,从而可以避免医护人员在采集鼻咽或口咽样本时面临风险,从而将个人防护设备用于患者护理而不是采样和检测。因此,与当前的鼻腔或喉咙拭子方法相比,更广泛的检测将大大增加筛查人数,从而更有效地控制 COVID-19 的传播。尽管如此,仍需要对基于唾液的检测与当前的拭子检测进行比较,以了解我们可以从这种新开发的检测中获得什么以及如何从中受益。因此,在这篇迷你综述文章中,我们旨在总结当前和新兴的工具,重点关注不同临床采样和标本的诊断能力。

相似文献

1
New COVID-19 saliva-based test: How good is it compared with the current nasopharyngeal or throat swab test?
J Chin Med Assoc. 2020 Oct;83(10):891-894. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000396.
3
Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 24;383(13):1283-1286. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2016359. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
5
Saliva Alternative to Upper Respiratory Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;26(11):2770-2771. doi: 10.3201/eid2611.203283. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
6
Evaluation on testing of deep throat saliva and lower respiratory tract specimens with Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Oct;131:104593. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104593. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
8
Nonserologic test for COVID-19: How to manage?
Head Neck. 2020 Jul;42(7):1552-1554. doi: 10.1002/hed.26270. Epub 2020 May 22.
9
Saliva as a Potential Diagnostic Specimen for COVID-19 Testing.
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Sep;31(6):e653-e655. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006724.

引用本文的文献

2
Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 clusters in three schools in Beijing, China: A retrospective study.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 30;10(15):e35425. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35425. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
7
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Human Saliva to Oropharyngeal Swabs, Nasopharyngeal Swabs, and Sputum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2023 Aug 10;2023:5807370. doi: 10.1155/2023/5807370. eCollection 2023.
8
Saliva-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic.
Theranostics. 2023 Jan 31;13(3):1091-1108. doi: 10.7150/thno.78872. eCollection 2023.
9
Role of Saliva as a Non-Invasive Diagnostic Method for Detection of COVID-19.
Cureus. 2022 Jul 29;14(7):e27471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27471. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Diagnostic Tools for Rapid Screening and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jul 28;10(8):1200. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081200.

本文引用的文献

1
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva and characterization of oral symptoms in COVID-19 patients.
Cell Prolif. 2020 Dec;53(12):e12923. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12923. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
2
Saliva is a reliable tool to detect SARS-CoV-2.
J Infect. 2020 Jul;81(1):e45-e50. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1564-1567. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2004973. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
5
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens.
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1843-1844. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786.
6
Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1708-1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
7
Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;20(4):411-412. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30113-4. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases.
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
9
Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Feb 17;9(1):386-389. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729071. eCollection 2020.
10
Consistent Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Saliva.
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 28;71(15):841-843. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa149.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验