Suppr超能文献

实时荧光定量 PCR 检测唾液中结核分枝杆菌复合群:一种潜在的肺结核诊断替代标本。

Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in saliva by quantitative PCR: A potential alternative specimen for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis.

机构信息

Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.

Department of Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2024 Sep;148:102554. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2024.102554. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic tests primarily rely on sputum samples, yet many TB patients cannot produce sputum. This study explored whether saliva could be used instead of sputum to diagnose pulmonary TB (PTB).

METHOD

The study included 32 patients with confirmed PTB and 30 patients with other respiratory diseases (ORD). Saliva from all study participants was subjected to quantitative (qPCR) assays targeting the IS1081 gene for detection of M. tuberculosis complex DNA.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of saliva IS1081 qPCR was 65.6 % (95 % CI 48.4-80.2 %) with positive results for 21/32 PTB cases, while the specificity was 96.7 % (95 % CI 85.9-99.6 %) with negative results for 29/30 participants with ORD. Sensitivity improved to 72.4 % (95 % CI 54.6-86.0 %) when sputum-Xpert was used as the reference standard, while remaining similar at 65.5 % (95 % CI 47.4-80.7 %) when culture was used as the reference standard. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the area under the curve (AUC) for saliva IS1081 qPCR was 82.5 % (95 % CI 71.7-93.3 %).

CONCLUSION

Saliva testing offers a promising alternative to sputum for TB diagnosis among confirmed PTB cases. Larger multicenter studies, encompassing diverse clinical TB characteristics, are needed to provide improved estimates of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

摘要

背景

目前的结核病(TB)诊断测试主要依赖于痰样本,但许多 TB 患者无法产生痰。本研究探讨了唾液是否可以替代痰来诊断肺结核(PTB)。

方法

本研究纳入了 32 例确诊的 PTB 患者和 30 例其他呼吸道疾病(ORD)患者。所有研究参与者的唾液均进行了针对结核分枝杆菌复合体 DNA 的定量(qPCR)检测。

结果

唾液 IS1081 qPCR 的敏感性为 65.6%(95%置信区间 48.4-80.2%),21/32 例 PTB 患者的检测结果为阳性,特异性为 96.7%(95%置信区间 85.9-99.6%),29/30 例 ORD 患者的检测结果为阴性。当以 Xpert 痰检为参考标准时,敏感性提高至 72.4%(95%置信区间 54.6-86.0%),而当以培养物为参考标准时,敏感性仍为 65.5%(95%置信区间 47.4-80.7%)。在受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析中,唾液 IS1081 qPCR 的曲线下面积(AUC)为 82.5%(95%置信区间 71.7-93.3%)。

结论

唾液检测为确诊的 PTB 患者提供了一种有前途的替代痰检的 TB 诊断方法。需要进行更大规模的多中心研究,涵盖不同的临床 TB 特征,以提供更准确的诊断敏感性和特异性估计。

相似文献

2
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay for tuberculosis disease and rifampicin resistance in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 6;9(9):CD013359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013359.pub3.
3
Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 21;2014(1):CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub3.
4
Low-complexity manual nucleic acid amplification tests for pulmonary tuberculosis in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 25;6(6):CD015806. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015806.pub2.
5
Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub2.
7
Xpert MTB/RIF assay for extrapulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 27;8(8):CD012768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012768.pub2.
9
Lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay for detecting active tuberculosis in HIV-positive adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 10;2016(5):CD011420. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011420.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A comprehensive update to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv reference genome.
Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 18;13(1):7068. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34853-x.
3
Feasibility and Sensitivity of Saliva GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Adults in Uganda.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0086022. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00860-22. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
4
The COVID-19 and TB syndemic: the way forward.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022 Aug 1;26(8):710-719. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.22.0006.
5
Accuracy of Tongue Swab Testing Using Xpert MTB-RIF Ultra for Tuberculosis Diagnosis.
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Jul 20;60(7):e0042122. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00421-22. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Saliva in the Diagnosis of COVID-19: A Review and New Research Directions.
J Dent Res. 2020 Dec;99(13):1435-1443. doi: 10.1177/0022034520960070. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
New COVID-19 saliva-based test: How good is it compared with the current nasopharyngeal or throat swab test?
J Chin Med Assoc. 2020 Oct;83(10):891-894. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000396.
9
Oral swab testing by Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra for mass tuberculosis screening in prisons.
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis. 2020 Feb 4;19:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2020.100148. eCollection 2020 May.
10
Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection from oral swabs with Xpert MTB/RIF ULTRA: a pilot study.
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jun 20;12(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4385-y.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验