Suppr超能文献

扩大 COVID-19 快速抗原检测规模:前景与挑战。

Scaling up COVID-19 rapid antigen tests: promises and challenges.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):e290-e295. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00048-7. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

Abstract

WHO recommends a minimum of 80% sensitivity and 97% specificity for antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), which can be used for patients with symptoms consistent with COVID-19. However, after the acute phase when viral load decreases, use of Ag-RDTs might lead to high rates of false negatives, suggesting that the tests should be replaced by a combination of molecular and serological tests. When the likelihood of having COVID-19 is low, such as for asymptomatic individuals in low prevalence settings, for travel, return to schools, workplaces, and mass gatherings, Ag-RDTs with high negative predictive values can be used with confidence to rule out infection. For those who test positive in low prevalence settings, the high false positive rate means that mitigation strategies, such as molecular testing to confirm positive results, are needed. Ag-RDTs, when used appropriately, are promising tools for scaling up testing and ensuring that patient management and public health measures can be implemented without delay.

摘要

世卫组织建议抗原检测快速诊断试剂(Ag-RDT)的最低灵敏度至少为 80%,特异性至少为 97%,这些试剂可用于有 COVID-19 症状一致的患者。然而,在病毒载量下降的急性期过后,Ag-RDT 的使用可能会导致高比例的假阴性,这表明这些检测应该被分子和血清学检测的组合所取代。当 COVID-19 的可能性较低时,例如在低流行地区的无症状个体、旅行、返回学校、工作场所和大规模集会,具有高阴性预测值的 Ag-RDT 可以被有信心地用于排除感染。对于那些在低流行地区检测呈阳性的人来说,高假阳性率意味着需要采取缓解策略,例如进行分子检测以确认阳性结果。Ag-RDT 在适当使用时,是扩大检测规模的有前途的工具,可确保患者管理和公共卫生措施能够毫不拖延地实施。

相似文献

1
Scaling up COVID-19 rapid antigen tests: promises and challenges.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):e290-e295. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00048-7. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
3
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
4
Taqman PACMAN: a simple molecular approach for positive rapid antigen test confirmation during periods of low prevalence.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 May 2;12(5):e0407323. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04073-23. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8(8):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.
6
Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0063922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00639-22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
Impaired performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests at elevated and low temperatures.
J Clin Virol. 2021 May;138:104796. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104796. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
8
The potential of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detection tests in the screening of asymptomatic persons.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Nov;27(11):1700.e1-1700.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.07.020. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
9
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
10
Diagnostic performance of CerTest and Panbio antigen rapid diagnostic tests to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection.
J Clin Virol. 2021 Apr;137:104781. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104781. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A policy roadmap for sustainable mass-testing.
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 29;3(8):qxaf151. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf151. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A User-Centered Service Model for Accelerating COVID-19 Diagnostic Innovation: The RADx-rad Dx Core Approach.
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2025 May 8;6:472-479. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2025.3568203. eCollection 2025.
4
Adaptive strategies for the deployment of rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19: a modelling study.
Gates Open Res. 2025 May 27;7:6. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.14202.2. eCollection 2023.
5
Advancing pathogen detection for airborne diseases.
Fundam Res. 2022 Oct 31;3(4):520-524. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2022.10.011. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Factors influencing uptake of diagnostic test interventions for SARS-CoV-2: A qualitative review.
J Public Health Afr. 2025 Apr 28;16(2):619. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i2.619. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
Analytical and clinical performance of the panbio COVID-19 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test.
J Infect. 2021 May;82(5):186-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.12.033. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Viral Cultures for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infectivity Assessment: A Systematic Review.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e3884-e3899. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1764.
4
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5393. Print 2021 Jan.
5
Evaluating the clinical utility and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in relation to RT-PCR Ct values.
Infection. 2021 Jun;49(3):555-557. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01542-0. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
COVID-19 Test Result Turnaround Time for Residents and Staff in US Nursing Homes.
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Apr 1;181(4):556-559. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7330.
7
Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity - A Strategy for Containment.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):e120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2025631. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
8
Serology testing in the COVID-19 pandemic response.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;20(9):e245-e249. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30517-X. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load and infectivity over the course of an infection.
J Infect. 2020 Sep;81(3):357-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.067. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
Evaluation of a novel antigen-based rapid detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples.
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.05.098. Epub 2020 Jun 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验