Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir, India.
Department of Biochemistry, Government Medical College, Srinagar, Kashmir, India.
J Hosp Med. 2021 May;16(5):274-281. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3609.
SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) poses a tremendous challenge to healthcare systems across the globe. Serologic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers (HCWs) may quantify the rate of clinically significant exposure in an institutional setting and identify those HCWs who are at greatest risk.
We conducted a survey and SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing among a convenience sample of HCWs from 79 non-COVID and 3 dedicated COVID hospitals in District Srinagar of Kashmir, India. In addition to testing for the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG), we collected information on demographics, occupational group, influenza-like illness (ILI) symptoms, nasopharyngeal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing status, history of close unprotected contacts, and quarantine/travel history.
Of 7,346 eligible HCWs, 2,915 (39.7%) participated in the study. The overall prevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibodies was 2.5% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.1%), while HCWs who had ever worked at a dedicated COVID-19 hospital had a substantially lower seroprevalence of 0.6% (95% CI, 0.2%-1.9%). Higher seroprevalence rates were observed among HCWs who reported a recent ILI (12.2%), a positive RT-PCR (27.6%), a history of being put under quarantine (4.9%), and a history of close unprotected contact with a person with COVID-19 (4.4%). Healthcare workers who ever worked at a dedicated COVID-19 hospital had a lower multivariate-adjusted risk of seropositivity (odds ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.66).
Our investigation suggests that infection-control practices, including a compliance-maximizing buddy system, are valuable and effective in preventing infection within a high-risk clinical setting. Universal masking, mandatory testing of patients, and residential dormitories for HCWs at COVID-19-dedicated hospitals is an effective multifaceted approach to infection control. Moreover, given that many infections among HCWs are community-acquired, it is likely that the vigilant practices in these hospitals will have spillover effects, creating ingrained behaviors that will continue outside the hospital setting.
SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-19)对全球医疗保健系统构成了巨大挑战。对医疗机构工作人员(HCW)的 SARS-CoV-2 感染进行血清学检测,可以量化机构环境中具有临床意义的暴露率,并确定那些面临最大风险的 HCW。
我们在印度克什米尔地区斯里纳加区的 79 家非 COVID 和 3 家专门的 COVID 医院中,对一个便利样本的 HCW 进行了调查和 SARS-CoV-2 血清学检测。除了检测 SARS-CoV-2 特异性免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)的存在外,我们还收集了人口统计学信息、职业群体、流感样疾病(ILI)症状、鼻咽逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测状况、密切无保护接触史和检疫/旅行史。
在 7346 名合格的 HCW 中,有 2915 名(39.7%)参加了研究。SARS-CoV-2 特异性 IgG 抗体的总体阳性率为 2.5%(95%置信区间,2.0%-3.1%),而曾在专门的 COVID-19 医院工作的 HCW 的血清阳性率明显较低,为 0.6%(95%置信区间,0.2%-1.9%)。报告最近有 ILI(12.2%)、RT-PCR 阳性(27.6%)、被隔离(4.9%)和与 COVID-19 患者有过密切无保护接触(4.4%)的 HCW 的血清阳性率较高。曾在专门的 COVID-19 医院工作的 HCW 的血清阳性率的多变量校正风险较低(比值比,0.21;95%置信区间,0.06-0.66)。
我们的调查表明,感染控制措施,包括最大限度提高依从性的伙伴制度,在高风险临床环境中预防感染是有价值且有效的。在 COVID-19 专门医院为 HCW 提供普遍的口罩、对患者进行强制性检测和居住宿舍,是一种有效的多方面感染控制方法。此外,由于许多 HCW 的感染是社区获得性的,因此这些医院的警惕性做法很可能会产生溢出效应,形成将在医院环境之外继续存在的根深蒂固的行为。