Pogreba-Brown Kristen, Austhof Erika, Tang Xin, Trejo Mario J, Owusu-Dommey Ama, Boyd Kylie, Armstrong Alexandra, Schaefer Kenzie, Bazaco Michael C, Batz Michael, Riddle Mark, Porter Chad
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2021 Sep;18(9):627-639. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2020.2910. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the proportion of postinfectious reactive arthritis (ReA) after bacterial enteric infection from one of four selected pathogens. We collected studies from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, which assessed the proportion of postinfectious ReA published from January 1, 2000 to April 1, 2018. Papers were screened independently by title, abstract, and full text; papers in English, Spanish, and Portuguese utilizing a case-control (CC) or cohort study design, with a laboratory confirmed or probable acute bacterial enteric infection and subsequent ReA, were included. The proportion of ReA cases was pooled between and across pathogens. Factors that can induce study heterogeneity were explored using univariate meta-regression, including region, sample size, study design, and ReA case ascertainment. Twenty-four articles were included in the final review. The estimated percentage of cases across studies describing -associated ReA ( = 11) was 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-5.84%); ( = 17) was 3.9 (95% CI 1.6-9.1%); ( = 6) was 1.0 (95% CI 0.2-4.9%); and ( = 7) was 3.4 (95% CI 0.8-13.7%). Combining all four pathogens, the estimated percentage of cases that developed ReA was 2.6 (95% CI 1.5-4.7%). Due to high heterogeneity reflected by high values, results should be interpreted with caution. However, the pooled proportion developing ReA from studies with sample sizes () <1000 were higher compared with > 1000 (6% vs. 0.3%), retrospective cohort studies were lower (1.1%) compared with CC or prospective cohorts (6.8% and 5.9%, respectively), and those where ReA cases are identified through medical record review were lower (0.3%) than those identified by a specialist (3.9%) or self-report (12%). The estimated percentage of people who developed ReA after infection with , , , or is relatively low (2.6). In the United States, this estimate would result in 84,480 new cases of ReA annually.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是估计四种特定病原体之一引起的细菌性肠道感染后感染后反应性关节炎(ReA)的比例。我们从PubMed、科学网和Embase收集了评估2000年1月1日至2018年4月1日发表的感染后ReA比例的研究。通过标题、摘要和全文对论文进行独立筛选;纳入采用病例对照(CC)或队列研究设计、经实验室确诊或可能为急性细菌性肠道感染并随后发生ReA的英文、西班牙文和葡萄牙文论文。汇总不同病原体之间及各病原体内部ReA病例的比例。使用单变量meta回归探索可能导致研究异质性的因素,包括地区、样本量、研究设计和ReA病例的确定方法。最终纳入综述的文章有24篇。描述与 相关的ReA( =11)的各项研究中,估计病例百分比为1.71(95%置信区间[CI]0.49-5.84%); ( =17)为3.9(95%CI 1.6-9.1%); ( =6)为1.0(95%CI 0.2-4.9%); ( =7)为3.4(95%CI 0.8-13.7%)。综合所有四种病原体,发生ReA的估计病例百分比为2.6(95%CI 1.5-4.7%)。由于高 值反映出高度异质性,结果应谨慎解释。然而,样本量()<1000的研究中发生ReA的汇总比例高于样本量>1000的研究(6%对0.3%),回顾性队列研究低于CC或前瞻性队列研究(分别为1.1%对6.8%和5.9%),通过病历审查确定ReA病例的研究低于由专科医生确定(3.9%)或自我报告确定(12%)的研究。感染 、 、 或 后发生ReA的估计人群百分比相对较低(2.6)。在美国,这一估计每年将导致84480例新的ReA病例。