Suppr超能文献

医疗机构开具阿片类镇痛药的偏倚:一项医院急诊科电子病历研究。

Provider Bias in prescribing opioid analgesics: a study of electronic medical Records at a Hospital Emergency Department.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Duke Network Analysis, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 6;21(1):1518. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11551-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians do not prescribe opioid analgesics for pain treatment equally across groups, and such disparities may pose significant public health concerns. Although research suggests that institutional constraints and cultural stereotypes influence doctors' treatment of pain, prior quantitative evidence is mixed. The objective of this secondary analysis is therefore to clarify which institutional constraints and patient demographics bias provider prescribing of opioid analgesics.

METHODS

We used electronic medical record data from an emergency department of a large U.S hospital during years 2008-2014. We ran multi-level logistic regression models to estimate factors associated with providing an opioid prescription during a given visit while controlling for ICD-9 diagnosis codes and between-patient heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 180,829 patient visits for 63,513 unique patients were recorded during the period of analysis. Overall, providers were significantly less likely to prescribe opioids to the same individual patient when the visit occurred during higher rates of emergency department crowding, later times of day, earlier in the week, later years in our sample, and when the patient had received fewer previous opioid prescriptions. Across all patients, providers were significantly more likely to prescribe opioids to patients who were middle-aged, white, and married. We found no bias towards women and no interaction effects between race and crowding or between race and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers tend to prescribe fewer opioids during constrained diagnostic situations and undertreat pain for patients from high-risk and marginalized demographic groups. Potential harms resulting from previous treatment decisions may accumulate by informing future treatment decisions.

摘要

背景

医生在为不同群体治疗疼痛时,不会平等地开出阿片类镇痛药,这种差异可能会引起重大的公共卫生问题。尽管有研究表明,制度约束和文化刻板印象会影响医生对疼痛的治疗,但之前的定量证据存在分歧。因此,本次二次分析的目的是明确哪些制度约束和患者人口统计学因素会影响医生开阿片类镇痛药的处方。

方法

我们使用了一家美国大型医院急诊科在 2008 年至 2014 年期间的电子病历数据。我们运行了多水平逻辑回归模型,以估计在给定就诊期间提供阿片类药物处方的相关因素,同时控制了 ICD-9 诊断代码和患者间的异质性。

结果

在分析期间共记录了 180829 次就诊和 63513 名独特患者的就诊记录。总体而言,当就诊发生在急诊科拥挤程度较高、就诊时间较晚、就诊时间较早、在样本中时间较晚以及患者之前接受的阿片类药物处方较少时,医生为同一患者开阿片类药物处方的可能性显著降低。在所有患者中,医生为中年、白人、已婚患者开阿片类药物处方的可能性显著增加。我们没有发现对女性的偏见,也没有发现种族与拥挤程度或种族与性别之间的交互作用。

结论

在诊断受限的情况下,医生往往会开出较少的阿片类药物,并且会对高风险和边缘化的人口统计学群体的患者进行疼痛治疗不足。先前治疗决策产生的潜在危害可能会通过影响未来的治疗决策而积累。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30a7/8344207/3531049ab83a/12889_2021_11551_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验