Suppr超能文献

心源性休克患者平均动脉压与结局的关系:来自 DOREMI 试验的观察。

The association between mean arterial pressure and outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock: insights from the DOREMI trial.

机构信息

CAPITAL Research Group, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, H-4238, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4W7, Canada.

Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, H-4238, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4W7, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Oct 1;10(7):712-720. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab052.

Abstract

AIMS

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of low cardiac output resulting in end-organ hypoperfusion. Despite high in-hospital mortality rates, little evidence exists regarding the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) target in CS. We therefore evaluated the relationship between achieved MAP and clinical outcomes in patients with CS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a post hoc analysis of the CAPITAL DOREMI trial: a randomized, double-blind trial comparing dobutamine to milrinone in patients with CS. We divided patients into a high MAP group (average MAP ≥ 70 mmHg over the 36 h following randomization), and a low MAP group (average MAP < 70 mmHg). Our primary outcome included in-hospital all-cause mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, need for cardiac transplantation or mechanical circulatory support, non-fatal myocardial infarction, transient ischaemic attack or stroke, or initiation of renal replacement therapy. In total, 71 (37.0%) patients achieved an average MAP < 70 mmHg, and 121 (63.0%) achieved an average MAP ≥ 70 mmHg. The primary outcome occurred in 48 (67.6%) patients in the low MAP group and 51 (42.2%) patients in the high MAP group [adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.92; P = 0.01]. All-cause mortality occurred in 41 (57.8%) and 35 (28.9%) patients in the low and high MAP groups, respectively (aRR 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.79; P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes between each group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CS treated with inotrope therapy, low MAP is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Randomized data evaluating optimal MAP targets in CS is needed to guide medical therapy.

摘要

目的

心源性休克(CS)是一种心输出量降低导致终末器官灌注不足的状态。尽管院内死亡率很高,但关于 CS 患者最佳平均动脉压(MAP)目标的证据很少。因此,我们评估了 CS 患者达到的 MAP 与临床结局之间的关系。

方法和结果

我们对 CAPITAL DOREMI 试验进行了事后分析:一项比较多巴酚丁胺与米力农在 CS 患者中的随机、双盲试验。我们将患者分为高 MAP 组(随机分组后 36 小时内平均 MAP≥70mmHg)和低 MAP 组(平均 MAP<70mmHg)。我们的主要结局包括院内全因死亡率、复苏性心脏骤停、需要心脏移植或机械循环支持、非致命性心肌梗死、短暂性脑缺血发作或中风,或开始肾脏替代治疗。共有 71 名(37.0%)患者达到平均 MAP<70mmHg,121 名(63.0%)患者达到平均 MAP≥70mmHg。低 MAP 组 48 名(67.6%)患者和高 MAP 组 51 名(42.2%)患者发生主要结局[调整后的相对风险(aRR)0.70;95%置信区间(CI)0.53-0.92;P=0.01]。低 MAP 组和高 MAP 组分别有 41 名(57.8%)和 35 名(28.9%)患者发生全因死亡率(aRR 0.56;95%CI 0.40-0.79;P<0.01)。两组之间的次要结局均无显著差异。

结论

在接受正性肌力药物治疗的 CS 患者中,低 MAP 与更差的临床结局相关。需要随机数据评估 CS 中最佳 MAP 目标,以指导药物治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验