Yu Xin, Li Jiaqi, Ye Lingyun, Zhao Jing, Xie Mengqing, Zhou Juan, Shen Yinchen, Zhou Fei, Wu Yan, Han Chaonan, Qian Jialin, Chu Tianqing, Su Chunxia
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital & Thoracic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Sep;10(9):3782-3792. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-681.
Despite the potent efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, drug resistance inevitably ensues, and there remains a paucity of treatment options in clinical practice.
We identified patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC presenting to Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital and Shanghai Chest Hospital between January 2015 and December 2020 treated with chemo-antiangiogenesis or chemo-immunotherapy combinations after EGFR-TKI resistance. Patient information was collected, and the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed.
A total of 144 patients who met our inclusion criteria were enrolled. Chemo-immunotherapy combinations achieved a higher objective response rate (ORR) compared with chemo-antiangiogenesis combinations (29.5% 13.0%, P=0.018). The DCR was similar between the two groups (93.0% 88.6%, P=0.585), as was the median PFS (7.59 6.90 months, P=0.552). In the subgroup analyses, patients who developed secondary T790M mutations after EGFR-TKI treatment were less likely to benefit from chemo-immunotherapy combinations than their T790M-negative counterparts (3.42 7.63 months, P=0.028). For patients who received chemo-antiangiogenesis combinations after TKI resistance, no significant difference was observed in the median PFS between T790M-positive and T790M-negative patients (median PFS: 5.33 7.46 months, P=0.202). Additionally, multivariate analysis showed that an elevated platelet count was independently associated with a worse PFS for both groups.
The efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy combinations was comparable to chemo-antiangiogenesis combinations after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy. For patients harboring EGFR T790M mutations, chemo-antiangiogenesis combinations may be the preferred therapeutic option. In addition, platelet count could be a potential prognostic factor for patients after failure of EGFR-TKI therapy. Further research should be conducted on larger populations and in a prospective setting.
尽管表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)在治疗EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中疗效显著,但不可避免地会出现耐药性,且临床实践中治疗选择仍然匮乏。
我们纳入了2015年1月至2020年12月期间在上海肺科医院和上海胸科医院就诊的EGFR突变的晚期NSCLC患者,这些患者在EGFR-TKI耐药后接受了化疗联合抗血管生成或化疗联合免疫治疗。收集患者信息,并评估客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和无进展生存期(PFS)。
共有144例符合纳入标准的患者入组。与化疗联合抗血管生成治疗相比,化疗联合免疫治疗的客观缓解率(ORR)更高(29.5%对13.0%,P=0.018)。两组的疾病控制率(DCR)相似(93.0%对88.6%,P=0.585),中位无进展生存期(PFS)也相似(7.59对6.90个月,P=0.552)。在亚组分析中,EGFR-TKI治疗后出现继发性T790M突变的患者比T790M阴性的患者从化疗联合免疫治疗中获益的可能性更小(3.42对7.63个月,P=0.028)。对于TKI耐药后接受化疗联合抗血管生成治疗的患者,T790M阳性和T790M阴性患者的中位无进展生存期无显著差异(中位PFS:5.33对7.46个月,P=0.202)。此外,多因素分析显示,血小板计数升高与两组患者较差的无进展生存期独立相关。
EGFR-TKI治疗失败后,化疗联合免疫治疗的疗效与化疗联合抗血管生成治疗相当。对于携带EGFR T790M突变的患者,化疗联合抗血管生成治疗可能是首选的治疗方案。此外,血小板计数可能是EGFR-TKI治疗失败后患者的潜在预后因素。应在更大规模人群中进行前瞻性研究。