Suppr超能文献

内科住院医师在糖尿病管理中对循证实践的依从性

Internal Medicine Resident Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices in Management of Diabetes Mellitus.

作者信息

Mehta Chirag, Cohen David, Jaisinghani Priya, Parikh Payal

机构信息

Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Feb 2;9:23821205221076659. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076659. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Diabetic preventative health maintenance involves (1) adherence to guidelines and (2) appropriate documentation. This study evaluates the frequency with which internal medicine (IM) residents met these two outcomes. We also evaluated if there were differences in outcomes between resident classes.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 234 diabetic outpatient visits were analyzed. Guidelines were derived from the American Diabetes Association (ADA). The outcomes for each guideline were averaged and stratified by resident class. Averages within and between classes were compared using the student's paired t-test and one-way ANOVA respectively.

RESULTS

Classes were most adherent to A1c testing guidelines (PGY-1 96.1%, PGY-2 97.6%, and PGY-3 95.9%). PGY-1 and PGY-2 classes were least adherent to podiatry (27.5% and 17.6% respectively), whereas PGY-3 had equal least adherence rates to podiatry and lifestyle modification guidelines (36.7%). All classes had highest rates in documenting A1c findings (PGY-1 92.2%, PGY-2 97.6%, and PGY-3 85.7%) and lowest rates in documenting relevant podiatry information (PGY-1 5.9%, PGY-2 5.9%, and PGY-3 11.2%). Comparing sequential resident classes, there was a decline in lifestyle counselling and documentation from PGY-1 to PGY-2. From PGY-2 to PGY-3, there was improvement in adherence to statin, podiatry, microalbuminuria, and monofilament guidelines. There was also improvement in documenting statin and monofilament usage, however, A1c reporting declined.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the study suggest disproportionate levels of care in diabetes preventative management. Additionally, program directors should take caution in assuming linear improvement with sequential resident classes.

摘要

目的

糖尿病预防性健康维护包括(1)遵循指南和(2)进行适当记录。本研究评估了内科住院医师达到这两个结果的频率。我们还评估了不同住院医师级别在结果上是否存在差异。

方法

在这项回顾性分析中,对234次糖尿病门诊就诊进行了分析。指南源自美国糖尿病协会(ADA)。对每个指南的结果进行平均,并按住院医师级别分层。分别使用学生配对t检验和单因素方差分析比较级别内和级别间的平均值。

结果

各级别对糖化血红蛋白(A1c)检测指南的遵循程度最高(PGY-1为96.1%,PGY-2为97.6%,PGY-3为95.9%)。PGY-1和PGY-2级别对足病治疗的遵循程度最低(分别为27.5%和17.6%),而PGY-3级别对足病治疗和生活方式改变指南的遵循程度同样最低(36.7%)。所有级别在记录A1c结果方面的比例最高(PGY-1为92.2%,PGY-2为97.6%,PGY-3为85.7%),而在记录相关足病信息方面的比例最低(PGY-1为5.9%,PGY-2为5.9%,PGY-3为11.2%)。比较连续的住院医师级别,从PGY-1到PGY-2,生活方式咨询和记录有所下降。从PGY-2到PGY-3,对他汀类药物、足病治疗、微量白蛋白尿和单丝检查指南的遵循程度有所改善。在记录他汀类药物和单丝检查的使用情况方面也有所改善,然而,A1c报告有所下降。

结论

该研究结果表明糖尿病预防性管理中的护理水平存在不均衡。此外,项目负责人在假设随着住院医师级别连续提升会有线性改善时应谨慎。

相似文献

1
Internal Medicine Resident Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices in Management of Diabetes Mellitus.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Feb 2;9:23821205221076659. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076659. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
A quality improvement project to increase compliance with diabetes measures in an academic outpatient setting.
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jul 23;5:11. doi: 10.1186/s40842-019-0084-9. eCollection 2019.
6
Effect of a diabetes curriculum on internal medicine resident knowledge.
Endocr Pract. 2010 May-Jun;16(3):408-18. doi: 10.4158/EP09275.OR.
8
Differences in preventive health quality by residency year. Is seniority better?
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep;20(9):825-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0158.x.
9
Changes in career decisions of internal medicine residents during training.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Nov 21;145(10):774-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Practice Ownership and Integration of Health Services on Adherence to Diabetes Guidelines.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241259685. doi: 10.1177/21501319241259685.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Diabetes Treatment and Control in U.S. Adults, 1999-2018.
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2219-2228. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2032271.
2
Are residents receiving the training needed within their residency programs to optimally manage patients with diabetes?
Postgrad Med. 2021 May;133(4):388-394. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1857603. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
Evaluating the impact of onsite diabetes education teams in primary care on clinical outcomes.
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Mar 3;21(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01111-2.
4
Resurgence in Diabetes-Related Complications.
JAMA. 2019 May 21;321(19):1867-1868. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3471.
5
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.
Clin Diabetes. 2018 Jan;36(1):14-37. doi: 10.2337/cd17-0119.
6
10. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: .
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S105-S118. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S010.
7
Diabetes and Hypertension: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association.
Diabetes Care. 2017 Sep;40(9):1273-1284. doi: 10.2337/dci17-0026.
8
Diabetic Retinopathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association.
Diabetes Care. 2017 Mar;40(3):412-418. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2641.
9
Diabetic Neuropathy: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association.
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(1):136-154. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2042.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验