Department of Applied Health, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL 62026, USA.
Department of Functional Biology, Campus del Crito B, University of Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 25;19(5):2678. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052678.
Background: Incorporating physical activity (PA) has been a challenge for health care professionals working with anorexia nervosa (AN) patients. This has contributed to partial physical fitness (PFit) recovery that persists after weight restoration. Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to examine the relationships between PA, sedentary behaviors, PFit, and quality of life (QoL) in a group of adolescents after hospitalization. Methods: QoL, PA, and sedentary behaviors were measured using the Health-Questionnaire Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and accelerometers, while PFit was assessed through cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition (anthropometry), and strength (six repetition maximum) tests in a total of 63 patients. Results: Light-PA (LPA), moderate-PA (MPA), moderate-to-vigorous-PA (MVPA), and relative sedentary time (%ST) did not meet the recommendations (p < 0.001). Only 22% of the patients met MVPA criteria, and ~82% exceeded %ST. SF-36 scores were lower than normative values except the physical component scale. Absolute cardiorespiratory fitness was reduced (p < 0.001) in 84% of the patients, and was positively associated to body weight, body mass index (BMI), circumferences, and muscle areas. Additional positive significant relationships were found between QoL, muscular strength, and body composition, and negative associations between vigorous-to-very vigorous PA and BMI, skinfolds, and percent body fat. Regression analyses revealed lower body strength as an explanatory factor for improved QoL (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.00−1.07). Conclusions: PFit and QoL scores are poor after hospitalization. LPA, MPA, and MVPA do not meet recommendations. PFit management—with emphasis on improving muscular fitness—may be a valuable strategy for QoL improvement in AN after hospitalization.
对于治疗厌食症(AN)患者的医疗保健专业人员来说,将体力活动(PA)纳入治疗一直是一个挑战。这导致了部分身体适应性(PFit)的恢复,即使在体重恢复后也仍然存在。
本横断面研究旨在检查住院后一组青少年的 PA、久坐行为、PFit 和生活质量(QoL)之间的关系。
使用健康调查问卷短表 36(SF-36)和加速度计测量 QoL、PA 和久坐行为,通过心肺适应性、身体成分(人体测量)和力量(最大重复次数 6 次)测试评估 PFit,共纳入 63 名患者。
轻度 PA(LPA)、中度 PA(MPA)、中高强度 PA(MVPA)和相对久坐时间(%ST)均未达到推荐标准(p < 0.001)。只有 22%的患者符合 MVPA 标准,约 82%的患者超过了%ST。SF-36 评分低于正常值,除身体成分量表外。84%的患者绝对心肺适应性降低(p < 0.001),且与体重、体重指数(BMI)、周长和肌肉面积呈正相关。还发现 QoL、肌肉力量和身体成分之间存在其他正相关关系,以及剧烈至非常剧烈的 PA 与 BMI、皮褶厚度和体脂肪百分比之间存在负相关关系。回归分析显示,较低的身体力量是 QoL 改善的解释因素(OR 1.03,95%CI 1.00−1.07)。
住院后 PFit 和 QoL 评分较差。LPA、MPA 和 MVPA 均未达到推荐标准。PFit 管理——重点是提高肌肉力量——可能是改善住院后 AN 患者 QoL 的一种有价值的策略。