Suppr超能文献

换用贝那利珠单抗治疗重度难治性嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的疗效

Effectiveness of Switching to Benralizumab in Severe Refractory Eosinophilic Asthma.

作者信息

Gómez-Bastero Fernández Ana, Medina Gallardo Juan Francisco, Delgado Romero Julio, Romero Falcón Auxiliadora, Benito Bernáldez Cristina, Gallego Borrego Javier, Álvarez-Gutiérrez Francisco Javier

机构信息

Asthma Unit of Pneumology, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

Asthma Unit of Pneumology, Virgen Del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

J Asthma Allergy. 2022 May 25;15:727-735. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S358705. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Benralizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the α subunit of the IL-5 receptor. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of this agent with respect to lung function and symptom control in patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of benralizumab after switching previous treatment with other monoclonal antibodies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective study under conditions of daily clinical practice. The study population comprised consecutively included patients with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma whose initial treatment with omalizumab or mepolizumab was switched to benralizumab. Patients were evaluated at 4 and 12 months after starting treatment with benralizumab. We analyzed asthma control, number of severe exacerbations, corticosteroid cycles, visits to the emergency department, and hospital admissions, as well as lung function. Similarly, we evaluated the response to treatment according to previously established criteria.

RESULTS

We evaluated 40 patients who switched from omalizumab (n=16) or mepolizumab (n=24) to benralizumab. The reasons for switching were lack of response in 30 cases, adverse effects in 9, and patient request in 1. Switching was followed by a significant decrease in the number of exacerbations, visits to the emergency department, and corticosteroid cycles, as well as improved ACT both at 4 and 12 months. However, no significant improvement in lung function was observed. Asthma control (including complete response and control) was achieved in 55% of patients (n=22) at 12 months. Specifically, a complete response was achieved in 30% of patients at 12 months (66.7% switching from omalizumab and 33.3% from mepolizumab).

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma who experience a partial response with omalizumab or mepolizumab could benefit from switching to benralizumab. This approach can reduce the number of exacerbations, visits to the emergency department, and corticosteroid cycles and improve control of asthma.

摘要

目的

贝那利珠单抗是一种靶向白细胞介素-5受体α亚基的单克隆抗体。临床试验已证明该药物在难治性嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者的肺功能和症状控制方面的疗效。然而,很少有研究评估在先前使用其他单克隆抗体治疗后改用贝那利珠单抗的疗效。

患者与方法

我们在日常临床实践条件下进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。研究人群包括连续纳入的重度难治性嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者,他们最初使用奥马珠单抗或美泊利珠单抗治疗后改用贝那利珠单抗。在开始使用贝那利珠单抗治疗后的4个月和12个月对患者进行评估。我们分析了哮喘控制情况、严重加重发作次数、皮质类固醇使用周期、急诊就诊次数和住院情况以及肺功能。同样,我们根据先前确立的标准评估治疗反应。

结果

我们评估了40例从奥马珠单抗(n = 16)或美泊利珠单抗(n = 24)改用贝那利珠单抗的患者。改用的原因是30例无反应、9例出现不良反应和1例患者要求。改用后,加重发作次数、急诊就诊次数和皮质类固醇使用周期显著减少,并且在4个月和12个月时哮喘控制测试(ACT)均有所改善。然而,未观察到肺功能有显著改善。12个月时,55%的患者(n = 22)实现了哮喘控制(包括完全缓解和控制)。具体而言,12个月时30%的患者实现了完全缓解(从奥马珠单抗改用的患者中为66.7%,从美泊利珠单抗改用的患者中为33.3%)。

结论

被诊断为重度难治性嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘且对奥马珠单抗或美泊利珠单抗有部分反应的患者,改用贝那利珠单抗可能会受益。这种方法可以减少加重发作次数、急诊就诊次数和皮质类固醇使用周期,并改善哮喘控制。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Switching to Benralizumab in Severe Refractory Eosinophilic Asthma.
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 May 25;15:727-735. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S358705. eCollection 2022.
2
Benralizumab in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Multicentre Real-Life Experience.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 28;12(13):4362. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134362.
3
Anti-IL-5 therapies for asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 12;7(7):CD010834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010834.pub4.
4
Anti-IL5 therapies for asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 21;9(9):CD010834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010834.pub3.
8
[The Effectiveness of Mepolizumab and Benralizumab in a Real-Life Cohort of Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma].
Open Respir Arch. 2021 Apr 28;3(2):100103. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2021.100103. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the real-world effectiveness of benralizumab in uncontrolled asthma.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21777. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07275-0.
4
Advancing Care in Severe Asthma: The Art of Switching Biologics.
Adv Respir Med. 2024 Feb 21;92(2):110-122. doi: 10.3390/arm92020014.
6
Benralizumab in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Multicentre Real-Life Experience.
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 28;12(13):4362. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134362.
7
Switching Biological Therapies in Severe Asthma.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 31;24(11):9563. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119563.
10
Real-World clinical outcomes of asthma patients switched from reslizumab to mepolizumab or benralizumab.
Front Allergy. 2023 Jan 4;3:1052339. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1052339. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
[Consensus document for severe asthma in adults. 2022 update].
Open Respir Arch. 2022 Jul 2;4(3):100192. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2022.100192. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
4
Effectiveness of Switching Biologics for Severe Asthma Patients in Japan: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Jun 3;14:609-618. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S311975. eCollection 2021.
7
Benralizumab after sub-optimal response to mepolizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma.
Allergy. 2021 Jun;76(6):1890-1893. doi: 10.1111/all.14693. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
Switch from IL-5 to IL-5-Receptor α Antibody Treatment in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.
J Asthma Allergy. 2020 Nov 11;13:605-614. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S270298. eCollection 2020.
9
Asthma exacerbations on benralizumab are largely non-eosinophilic.
Allergy. 2021 Jan;76(1):375-379. doi: 10.1111/all.14514. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
10
Real-life experience with benralizumab during 6 months.
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01220-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验