Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Canberra, Australia; Physiotherapy Department, Canberra Hospital, Australia.
Intensive Care Unit, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Australia.
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Jul;36(4):613-621. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
In patients who are ventilator-dependent in the intensive care unit, inspiratory muscle training may improve inspiratory muscle strength and accelerate liberation from the ventilator, but optimal training parameters are yet to be established, and little is known about the impact of inspiratory muscle training on quality of life or dyspnoea. Thus, we sought to ascertain whether inspiratory muscle training, commenced while ventilator-dependent, would improve outcomes for patients invasively ventilated for 7 days or longer.
In this randomised trial with assessor blinding and intention-to-treat analysis, 70 participants (mechanically ventilated ≥7 days) were randomised to receive once-daily supervised high-intensity inspiratory muscle training with a mechanical threshold device in addition to usual care or to receive usual care (control). Primary outcomes were inspiratory muscle strength (maximum inspiratory pressure % predicted) and endurance (fatigue resistance index) at ventilator liberation and 1 week later. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (SF-36v2, EQ-5D), dyspnoea, physical function, duration of ventilation, and in-hospital mortality.
Thirty-three participants were randomly allocated to the training group, and 37 to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in strength (maximum inspiratory pressure) (95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.4 to 14.0) or endurance (fatigue resistance index) (95% CI: -0.003 to 0.436). Quality of life improved significantly more in the training group than in the control group (EQ-5D: 17.2; 95% CI: 1.3-33.0) (SF-36-PCS: 6.97; 95% CI: 1.96-12.00). Only the training group demonstrated significant reductions in dyspnoea (-1.5 at rest, -1.9 during exercise). There were no between-group differences in duration of ventilation or other measures. In-hospital mortality was higher in the control group than in the training group (9 vs 4, 24% vs 12%, p = 0.23).
In patients who are ventilator-dependent, mechanical threshold loading inspiratory muscle training improves quality of life and dyspnoea, even in the absence of strength improvements or acceleration of ventilator liberation.
在重症监护病房中需要依赖呼吸机的患者中,吸气肌训练可能会改善吸气肌力量并加速脱离呼吸机,但最佳的训练参数尚未确定,并且对于吸气肌训练对生活质量或呼吸困难的影响知之甚少。因此,我们试图确定在接受呼吸机通气治疗 7 天或更长时间的患者中,开始时进行吸气肌训练是否会改善预后。
在这项随机试验中,我们对评估者进行了盲法评估,并采用意向治疗分析,将 70 名(接受呼吸机通气治疗≥7 天)参与者随机分配至接受每日一次的、有监督的高强度吸气肌训练(使用机械阈负荷装置)+常规治疗组,或接受常规治疗(对照组)。主要结局为呼吸机脱机时和 1 周后吸气肌力量(最大吸气压力占预计值的百分比)和耐力(疲劳阻力指数)。次要结局包括生活质量(SF-36v2,EQ-5D)、呼吸困难、身体功能、通气时间和院内死亡率。
33 名参与者被随机分配至训练组,37 名参与者被随机分配至对照组。两组之间的力量(最大吸气压力)(95%置信区间:-7.4 至 14.0)或耐力(疲劳阻力指数)(95%置信区间:-0.003 至 0.436)无统计学差异。与对照组相比,训练组的生活质量显著提高(EQ-5D:17.2;95%置信区间:1.3-33.0)(SF-36-PCS:6.97;95%置信区间:1.96-12.00)。只有训练组在休息时(-1.5)和运动时(-1.9)的呼吸困难显著减轻。两组在通气时间或其他指标上无差异。对照组的院内死亡率高于训练组(9 例 vs 4 例,24% vs 12%,p=0.23)。
在需要依赖呼吸机的患者中,机械阈负荷吸气肌训练可改善生活质量和呼吸困难,即使在力量改善或加速呼吸机脱机方面没有改善。