Suppr超能文献

中年人及老年人抗阻训练量的调控:一项系统评价及荟萃分析,评估其对肌肉力量和维度、肌肉质量和功能能力的影响。

Manipulating the Resistance Training Volume in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of the Effects on Muscle Strength and Size, Muscle Quality, and Functional Capacity.

机构信息

Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.

Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development (CIDESD), Covilhã, Portugal.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2023 Feb;53(2):503-518. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01769-x. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective manipulation of the acute variables of resistance training is critical to optimizing muscle and functional adaptations in middle-aged and older adults. However, the ideal volume prescription (e.g., number of sets performed per exercise) in middle-aged and older adults remains inconclusive in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

The effects of single versus multiple sets per exercise on muscle strength and size, muscle quality, and functional capacity in middle-aged and older adults were compared. Moreover, the effects of single versus multiple sets per exercise on muscular and functional gains were also examined, considering the influence of training duration.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials comparing single versus multiple sets per exercise on muscle strength, muscle size, muscle quality, or functional capacity in middle-aged and older adults (aged ≥ 50 years) in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (01/09/2021, updated on 15/05/2022) were identified. A random-effects meta-analysis was used.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included (430 participants; 93% women; age 57.9-70.1 years). Multiple sets per exercise produced a greater effect than single sets on lower-limb strength (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-0.51; mean difference [MD] = 1.91 kg; 95% CI 0.50-3.33) and muscle quality (SMD = 0.40; 95% CI 0.05-0.75) gains. There were no differences between single versus multiple sets per exercise for upper-limb strength (SMD = 0.13; 95% CI - 0.14 to 0.40; MD = 0.11 kg; 95% CI - 0.52 to 0.75), muscle size (SMD = 0.15; 95% CI - 0.07 to 0.37), and functional capacity (SMD = 0.01; 95% CI - 0.47 to 0.50) gains. In addition, there were no differences between single versus multiple sets on muscle strength and size gains for training durations ≤ 12 weeks or > 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple sets per exercise produced greater lower-limb strength and muscle quality gains than single sets in middle-aged and older adults, although the magnitude of the difference was small. In contrast, single sets per exercise were sufficient to improve upper-limb strength, muscle size, and functional capacity in these populations. Despite these findings, researchers should conduct future high-quality, pre-registered, and blinded randomized controlled trials to strengthen the scientific evidence on this topic.

摘要

背景

有效控制抗阻训练的急性变量对于优化中年和老年人的肌肉和功能适应性至关重要。然而,在文献中,中年和老年人的理想训练量(例如,每个练习完成的组数)仍然没有定论。

目的

比较单组和多组练习对中年和老年人肌肉力量和大小、肌肉质量和功能能力的影响。此外,还考虑了训练持续时间的影响,研究了单组和多组练习对肌肉和功能增益的影响。

方法

在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库中(2021 年 9 月 1 日,更新于 2022 年 5 月 15 日),检索了比较单组和多组练习对中年和老年人(≥50 岁)肌肉力量、肌肉大小、肌肉质量或功能能力的随机对照试验和非随机对照试验。使用随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了 15 项研究(430 名参与者;93%为女性;年龄 57.9-70.1 岁)。与单组练习相比,多组练习对下肢力量(标准化均数差 [SMD] = 0.29;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.07-0.51;差值 [MD] = 1.91 千克;95% CI 0.50-3.33)和肌肉质量(SMD = 0.40;95% CI 0.05-0.75)的增益有更大的影响。在上肢力量(SMD = 0.13;95% CI -0.14 至 0.40;MD = 0.11 千克;95% CI -0.52 至 0.75)、肌肉大小(SMD = 0.15;95% CI -0.07 至 0.37)和功能能力(SMD = 0.01;95% CI -0.47 至 0.50)方面,单组和多组练习之间没有差异。此外,对于训练持续时间≤12 周或>12 周的人群,单组和多组练习在肌肉力量和大小方面的增益没有差异。

结论

与单组练习相比,多组练习在中年和老年人中产生了更大的下肢力量和肌肉质量增益,尽管差异幅度较小。相比之下,单组练习足以改善这些人群的上肢力量、肌肉大小和功能能力。尽管有这些发现,研究人员仍应开展高质量、预先注册和盲法随机对照试验,以加强该主题的科学证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验