Department of Sociology and Demography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 702 Oswald Tower, PA, 16802, United States.
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Jul;113:102888. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102888. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
The network perspective on social capital decomposes it into ego's network size, alters' relevant resources, and social factors moderating access to alters' resources, but rarely examines how it is distributed across relationship types. Using this approach, I investigate the situationally-relevant social capital relationship distribution and its association with health-related social support, with an application to the living kidney donor relationship distribution. Analyzing an original survey of transplant candidates (N = 72) and their reports on their family and friends (N = 1548), I compare the tie count, donation-relevant biomedical resource, and tie strength relationship distributions to administrative data on the national distribution of living kidney donor relationships. I find that the tie strength relationship distribution matches the completed living kidney donor relationship distribution far better than the tie count and donation-relevant biomedical resource relationship distributions. These conclusions are upheld in race- and gender-stratified analyses and are robust across alternative approaches.
从网络视角来看,社会资本可以分解为自我的网络规模、相关的变更资源以及调节变更资源获取的社会因素,但很少有研究关注它在关系类型中的分布情况。我采用这种方法来研究相关的社会资本关系分布情况及其与健康相关社会支持的关系,并将其应用于活体肾脏捐赠者关系的分布。通过分析一项针对移植候选人(N=72)及其家人和朋友(N=1548)的原始调查,我将关系数量、捐赠相关的生物医学资源以及关系强度关系分布与全国活体肾脏捐赠者关系分布的行政数据进行了比较。我发现,关系强度关系分布与已完成的活体肾脏捐赠者关系分布的匹配程度远远超过关系数量和捐赠相关生物医学资源关系分布。这些结论在种族和性别分层分析中得到了支持,并且在替代方法中具有稳健性。