Daw Jonathan, Verdery Ashton M, Margolis Rachel
Department of Sociology and Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University.
Department of Sociology, University of Western Ontario.
Popul Dev Rev. 2016 Sep;42(3):491-517. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2016.00150.x. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
Kinship networks are important but remain understudied in contemporary developed societies. Because hazards of vital events such as marriage, fertility, and mortality vary demographically, it is likely that average numbers of extended kin also vary meaningfully by education and race, but researchers have not addressed this topic. Existing research on kinship in developed societies focuses on group-level differences in multiplex kin networks such as those comprising household co-residence, instrumental and emotional support, and frequency of contact. By contrast, we provide the first population-based estimates of group-level differences in living kin in the contemporary United States. We estimate, by race, educational attainment, and age, average numbers of living parents, children, spouse/partner, full and half siblings, grandparents, grandchildren, aunt/uncles, nieces/nephews, and cousins, and test whether group differences in average kin counts are attributable to group differences in kin mortality and other processes.
亲属关系网络很重要,但在当代发达社会中仍未得到充分研究。由于诸如婚姻、生育和死亡等重大事件的风险在人口统计学上存在差异,因此大家庭亲属的平均数量很可能也会因教育程度和种族而产生显著差异,但研究人员尚未探讨这一话题。现有关于发达社会亲属关系的研究主要关注多重亲属网络在群体层面的差异,比如那些包括家庭共同居住、工具性和情感性支持以及联系频率的网络。相比之下,我们首次基于美国当代人口数据,对在世亲属在群体层面的差异进行了估计。我们按种族、教育程度和年龄,估算了在世父母、子女、配偶/伴侣、亲兄弟姐妹和同父异母或同母异父的兄弟姐妹、祖父母、孙子女、叔伯姑舅姨、侄子侄女和堂表亲的平均数量,并检验了亲属平均数量的群体差异是否归因于亲属死亡率和其他因素的群体差异。