Suppr超能文献

度伐利尤单抗 ± 替西木单抗联合铂类依托泊苷治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌(CASPIAN):基于 PD-L1 表达和组织肿瘤突变负荷的结果。

Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab + Platinum-Etoposide in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (CASPIAN): Outcomes by PD-L1 Expression and Tissue Tumor Mutational Burden.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Lung Cancer Unit CNIO-H120, Complutense University and Ciberonc, Madrid, Spain.

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Feb 16;30(4):824-835. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-1689.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In the CASPIAN trial, first-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide (EP) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus EP alone in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We report exploratory analyses of CASPIAN outcomes by programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and tissue tumor mutational burden (tTMB).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to durvalumab (1,500 mg) plus EP, durvalumab plus tremelimumab (75 mg) plus EP, or EP alone. Treatment effects in PD-L1 and tTMB subgroups were estimated using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The PD-L1 and tTMB biomarker-evaluable populations (BEP) comprised 54.4% (438/805) and 35.2% (283/805) of the intention-to-treat population, respectively. PD-L1 prevalence was low: 5.7%, 25.8%, and 28.3% had PD-L1 expression on ≥1% tumor cells (TC), ≥1% immune cells (IC), and ≥1% TCs or ICs, respectively. OS benefit with durvalumab plus EP versus EP was similar across PD-L1 subgroups, with HRs all falling within the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the PD-L1 BEP (0.47‒0.79). OS benefit with durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus EP versus EP was greater in PD-L1 ≥1% versus <1% subgroups, although CIs overlapped. There was no evidence of an interaction between tTMB and treatment effect on OS (durvalumab plus EP vs. EP, P = 0.916; durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus EP vs. EP, P = 0.672).

CONCLUSIONS

OS benefit with first-line durvalumab plus EP in patients with ES-SCLC was observed regardless of PD-L1 or tTMB status. PD-L1 expression may prove to be a useful biomarker for combined treatment with PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibition, although this requires confirmation with an independent dataset. See related commentary by Rolfo and Russo, p. 652.

摘要

目的

在 CASPIAN 试验中,与 EP 单药治疗相比,一线 durvalumab 联合铂类依托泊苷(EP)显著改善了广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者的总生存期(OS)。我们报告了根据程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)表达和组织肿瘤突变负担(tTMB)对 CASPIAN 结果的探索性分析。

实验设计

患者按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至 durvalumab(1500mg)联合 EP、durvalumab 联合 tremelimumab(75mg)联合 EP 或 EP 单药治疗。使用非分层 Cox 比例风险模型估计 PD-L1 和 tTMB 亚组的治疗效果。

结果

PD-L1 和 tTMB 生物标志物可评估人群(BEP)分别占意向治疗人群的 54.4%(438/805)和 35.2%(283/805)。PD-L1 阳性率较低:分别有 5.7%、25.8%和 28.3%的患者肿瘤细胞(TC)上的 PD-L1 表达≥1%、免疫细胞(IC)上的 PD-L1 表达≥1%以及 TC 或 IC 上的 PD-L1 表达≥1%。与 EP 单药治疗相比,durvalumab 联合 EP 治疗在 PD-L1 亚组中的 OS 获益相似,风险比均在 PD-L1 BEP 的 95%置信区间(0.47-0.79)内。与 EP 单药治疗相比,durvalumab 联合 tremelimumab 联合 EP 治疗在 PD-L1≥1%与<1%亚组中的 OS 获益更大,尽管 CI 有重叠。在 OS 方面,tTMB 与治疗效果之间没有证据表明存在交互作用(durvalumab 联合 EP 对比 EP,P=0.916;durvalumab 联合 tremelimumab 联合 EP 对比 EP,P=0.672)。

结论

在 ES-SCLC 患者中,一线 durvalumab 联合 EP 治疗可观察到 OS 获益,无论 PD-L1 或 tTMB 状态如何。PD-L1 表达可能被证明是 PD-(L)1 和 CTLA-4 抑制联合治疗的有用生物标志物,尽管这需要通过独立数据集进行确认。见 Rolfo 和 Russo 的相关评论,第 652 页。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98b1/10870117/0affbba3b0d2/824fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验