Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Natera, Austin, TX, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):1444-1446. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14751-2. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly lethal with up to 80% of resected patients experiencing disease recurrence within 2 years (Watanabe, Nakamura, Kimura et al in Int J Mol Sci 23(19):11521, 2022). Cross-sectional imaging and serum tumor markers are used for monitoring post-operative recurrence; however, both have significant limitations (Edland, Tjensvoll, Oltedal et al in Mol Oncol 17:1857-1870, 2023). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a valuable prognostic tool to measure molecular residual disease (MRD) and predict recurrence in solid tumors (Watanabe, Nakamura, Kimura et al in Int J Mol Sci 23(19):11521, 2022). In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay to detect recurrence prior to standard surveillance tools in patients with PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (Pro00106870), we assessed serial ctDNA measurements (n = 177) from 35 patients with resectable PDAC treated by either upfront resection or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Plasma samples (median 4 ml, interquartile range 0.6-5.9 ml) were isolated from blood collected in EDTA tubes and banked at diagnosis, during neoadjuvant therapy if applicable, on the day of surgery, and every 2-3 months postoperatively. A tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, Natera, Inc.) that tracks up to 16 individual-specific, somatic single nucleotide variants in the corresponding patient's plasma samples were used for ctDNA detection. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and significance was determined with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Personalized ctDNA assays were successfully designed for all patients (with 32/35 patients having 16-plex assays). Median follow-up from initial treatment was 13 months (range 1-26 months; Table 1). ctDNA-positivity at any time point was observed in 40% (14/35) of patients. During the follow-up period, 18 patients (51%) developed radiographic evidence of recurrence after a median of 9 months of follow-up (range 1-26 months). At the time of radiographic recurrence, 50% (9/18) of patients were ctDNA-positive. During the immediate postoperative period (up to 9 weeks post-surgery), RFS and OS were significantly inferior in patients who were ctDNA-positive versus ctDNA-negative (RFS 97 versus 297 days, p < 0.001; OS 110 versus 381 days, p < 0.001; Fig. 1). Table 1 Cohort demographics (N = 35); patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival Gender (%) Female 17 (49%) Male 18 (51%) Median age (IQR) 70 years (65-75 years) Neoadjuvant treatment (%) 11 (31%) Median sample plasma volume (IQR) 4.0 mL (0.6-5.9 mL) Median follow-up (range) 13 months (1-26 months) Median initial CA 19-9 in U/mL (IQR) 56 (18-160) Median tumor size in cm (IQR) 2.5 (1.8-3.3) Median number of positive lymph nodes (IQR) 1 (0-3) Median recurrence-free survival 9.4 months Median overall survival N/A (not reached) Fig. 1 a Overview plot showing longitudinal ctDNA status, treatment regimen, and clinical outcomes for each patient (N = 35); median follow-up from the start of the neoadjuvant therapy/surgery was 13 months (range 1-26 months); ctDNA at any time point was 40% (14/35); out of the 35 patients, 18 (51%) developed radiographic evidence of recurrence (median RFS: 9 months), and of these 18 patients with clinical recurrence, 9 (50%) were ctDNA-positive and the remaining ctDNA-negative; notably, all ctDNA-negative patients with recurrence had suboptimal plasma volume available for ctDNA analysis; b, c Kaplan-Meier estimates representing the association of ctDNA status with (b) RFS and (c) OS, at MRD time point (9 weeks post-surgery) DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of tumor-informed ctDNA-based MRD testing in resectable PDAC and shows that MRD detected by ctDNA within the immediate postoperative period portends a dismal prognosis. This information is valuable for both patients and clinicians in setting prognostic expectations.
背景:胰腺癌(PDAC)的致死率极高,高达 80%的接受手术的患者在 2 年内(Watanabe、Nakamura、Kimura 等人在 Int J Mol Sci 23(19):11521, 2022)出现疾病复发。横断面成像和血清肿瘤标志物用于监测术后复发;然而,两者都有明显的局限性(Edland、Tjensvoll、Oltedal 等人在 Mol Oncol 17:1857-1870, 2023)。循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)已成为一种有价值的预后工具,可用于测量分子残留疾病(MRD)并预测实体瘤的复发(Watanabe、Nakamura、Kimura 等人在 Int J Mol Sci 23(19):11521, 2022)。在这项研究中,我们评估了一种个性化的、基于肿瘤的 ctDNA 检测方法在标准监测工具之前检测可切除 PDAC 患者复发的可行性。方法:在获得机构审查委员会(IRB)批准(Pro00106870)后,我们评估了 35 名接受根治性手术或新辅助化疗的可切除 PDAC 患者的连续 ctDNA 测量(n=177)。从中采集血液,用 EDTA 管分离血浆样本(中位数 4ml,四分位距 0.6-5.9ml),并在诊断时、如果适用,则在新辅助治疗期间、手术当天以及术后每 2-3 个月储存一次。使用一种肿瘤信息 ctDNA 检测方法(Signatera™,Natera,Inc.),该方法可跟踪患者相应血浆样本中多达 16 个个体特异性的体细胞单核苷酸变异,用于 ctDNA 检测。使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线计算生存率,并使用对数秩检验确定显著性。结果:为所有患者(32/35 名患者有 16 聚体检测)成功设计了个性化的 ctDNA 检测方法。从初始治疗开始的中位随访时间为 13 个月(范围 1-26 个月;表 1)。在任何时间点,ctDNA 阳性的患者占 40%(35/35)。在随访期间,18 名患者(51%)在中位随访 9 个月后出现影像学复发(范围 1-26 个月)。在影像学复发时,9 名患者(50%)ctDNA 阳性。在术后即刻(术后 9 周内),ctDNA 阳性患者的 RFS 和 OS 明显低于 ctDNA 阴性患者(RFS 97 与 297 天,p<0.001;OS 110 与 381 天,p<0.001;图 1)。表 1 队列人口统计学(N=35);患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征和生存性别(%)女性 17(49%)男性 18(51%)中位年龄(IQR)70 岁(65-75 岁)新辅助治疗(%)11(31%)中位血浆样本体积(IQR)4.0 毫升(0.6-5.9 毫升)中位随访时间(范围)13 个月(1-26 个月)中位初始 CA 19-9 在 U/mL(IQR)56(18-160)中位肿瘤大小(cm)(IQR)2.5(1.8-3.3)中位阳性淋巴结数量(IQR)1(0-3)中位无复发生存时间 9.4 个月中位总生存 N/A(未达到)图 1 a 概述图显示每个患者的 ctDNA 状态、治疗方案和临床结局的纵向变化(N=35);从新辅助治疗/手术开始的中位随访时间为 13 个月(范围 1-26 个月);任何时间点的 ctDNA 阳性率为 40%(14/35);在 35 名患者中,18 名(51%)出现影像学复发(中位 RFS:9 个月),在这些出现临床复发的 18 名患者中,9 名(50%)ctDNA 阳性,其余 ctDNA 阴性;值得注意的是,所有复发且 ctDNA 阴性的患者的血浆样本体积均不足以进行 ctDNA 分析;b,c Kaplan-Meier 估计代表 ctDNA 状态与(b)RFS 和(c)OS 的关联,在 MRD 时间点(术后 9 周)