Trasande Leonardo, Krithivasan Roopa, Park Kevin, Obsekov Vladislav, Belliveau Michael
Department of Pediatrics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NewYork, NY 10016, USA.
Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NewYork, NY 10016, USA.
J Endocr Soc. 2024 Jan 11;8(2):bvad163. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvad163. eCollection 2024 Jan 5.
Chemicals used in plastics have been described to contribute to disease and disability, but attributable fractions have not been quantified to assess specific contributions. Without this information, interventions proposed as part of the Global Plastics Treaty cannot be evaluated for potential benefits.
To accurately inform the tradeoffs involved in the ongoing reliance on plastic production as a source of economic productivity in the United States, we calculated the attributable disease burden and cost due to chemicals used in plastic materials in 2018.
We first analyzed the existing literature to identify plastic-related fractions (PRF) of disease and disability for specific polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDE), phthalates, bisphenols, and polyfluoroalkyl substances and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). We then updated previously published disease burden and cost estimates for these chemicals in the United States to 2018. By uniting these data, we computed estimates of attributable disease burden and costs due to plastics in the United States.
We identified PRFs of 97.5% for bisphenol A (96.25-98.75% for sensitivity analysis), 98% (96%-99%) for di-2-ethylhexylphthalate, 100% (71%-100%) for butyl phthalates and benzyl phthalates, 98% (97%-99%) for PBDE-47, and 93% (16%-96%) for PFAS. In total, we estimate $249 billion (sensitivity analysis: $226 billion-$289 billion) in plastic-attributable disease burden in 2018. The majority of these costs arose as a result of PBDE exposure, though $66.7 billion ($64.7 billion-67.3 billion) was due to phthalate exposure and $22.4 billion was due to PFAS exposure (sensitivity analysis: $3.85-$60.1 billion).
Plastics contribute substantially to disease and associated social costs in the United States, accounting for 1.22% of the gross domestic product. The costs of plastic pollution will continue to accumulate as long as exposures continue at current levels. Actions through the Global Plastics Treaty and other policy initiatives will reduce these costs in proportion to the actual reductions in chemical exposures achieved.
塑料中使用的化学物质被认为会导致疾病和残疾,但尚未对可归因比例进行量化以评估具体影响。没有这些信息,就无法评估作为《全球塑料条约》一部分提出的干预措施的潜在益处。
为了准确说明美国持续依赖塑料生产作为经济生产力来源所涉及的权衡取舍,我们计算了2018年塑料材料中使用的化学物质导致的可归因疾病负担和成本。
我们首先分析现有文献,以确定特定多溴二苯醚(PBDE)、邻苯二甲酸盐、双酚以及多氟烷基物质和全氟烷基物质(PFAS)导致疾病和残疾的塑料相关比例(PRF)。然后,我们将美国这些化学物质先前公布的疾病负担和成本估计更新至2018年。通过整合这些数据,我们计算了美国塑料导致的可归因疾病负担和成本估计值。
我们确定双酚A的PRF为97.5%(敏感性分析为96.25 - 98.75%),邻苯二甲酸二(2 - 乙基己基)酯为98%(96% - 99%),邻苯二甲酸丁酯和邻苯二甲酸苄酯为100%(71% - 100%),PBDE - 47为98%(97% - 99%),PFAS为93%(16% - 96%)。总体而言,我们估计2018年塑料导致的疾病负担为2490亿美元(敏感性分析:2260亿美元 - 2890亿美元)。这些成本大部分是由于接触PBDE产生的,不过667亿美元(647亿美元 - 673亿美元)是由于接触邻苯二甲酸盐,224亿美元是由于接触PFAS(敏感性分析:38.5亿美元 - 601亿美元)。
塑料对美国的疾病和相关社会成本有重大贡献,占国内生产总值的1.22%。只要目前的接触水平持续,塑料污染的成本将继续累积。通过《全球塑料条约》和其他政策举措采取的行动将根据实际实现的化学物质接触减少比例相应降低这些成本。