Tsinghua Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Feb 27;83(8):783-793. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.019.
Although physical activity is widely recommended for reducing cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risks, female individuals consistently lag behind male individuals in exercise engagement.
The goal of this study was to evaluate whether physical activity derived health benefits may differ by sex.
In a prospective study of 412,413 U.S. adults (55% female, age 44 ± 17 years) who provided survey data on leisure-time physical activity, we examined sex-specific multivariable-adjusted associations of physical activity measures (frequency, duration, intensity, type) with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality from 1997 through 2019.
During 4,911,178 person-years of follow-up, there were 39,935 all-cause deaths including 11,670 cardiovascular deaths. Regular leisure-time physical activity compared with inactivity was associated with 24% (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73-0.80) and 15% (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.82-0.89) lower risk of all-cause mortality in women and men, respectively (Wald F = 12.0, sex interaction P < 0.001). Men reached their maximal survival benefit of HR 0.81 from 300 min/wk of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, whereas women achieved similar benefit at 140 min/wk and then continued to reach a maximum survival benefit of HR 0.76 also at ∼300 min/wk. Sex-specific findings were similar for cardiovascular death (Wald F = 20.1, sex interaction P < 0.001) and consistent across all measures of aerobic activity as well as muscle strengthening activity (Wald F = 6.7, sex interaction P = 0.009).
Women compared with men derived greater gains in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk reduction from equivalent doses of leisure-time physical activity. These findings could enhance efforts to close the "gender gap" by motivating especially women to engage in any regular leisure-time physical activity.
尽管身体活动被广泛推荐用于降低心血管疾病和全因死亡率风险,但女性在参与运动方面始终落后于男性。
本研究旨在评估身体活动带来的健康益处是否因性别而异。
在一项对 412,413 名美国成年人(55%为女性,年龄 44 ± 17 岁)的前瞻性研究中,我们根据休闲时间身体活动情况进行了调查,研究了身体活动措施(频率、持续时间、强度、类型)与 1997 年至 2019 年全因和心血管死亡率的性别特异性多变量调整关联。
在 4,911,178 人年的随访期间,共有 39,935 例全因死亡,包括 11,670 例心血管死亡。与不活动相比,定期进行休闲时间身体活动与女性和男性的全因死亡率分别降低 24%(HR:0.76;95%CI:0.73-0.80)和 15%(HR:0.85;95%CI:0.82-0.89)相关(Wald F = 12.0,性别交互作用 P < 0.001)。男性从 300 分钟/周的中等至剧烈身体活动中获得了最大的生存获益,HR 为 0.81,而女性则在 140 分钟/周时达到了类似的获益,然后继续达到了最大的生存获益,HR 为 0.76,也在大约 300 分钟/周时达到。心血管死亡的性别特异性发现(Wald F = 20.1,性别交互作用 P < 0.001)以及所有有氧运动和肌肉强化活动措施的结果均相似(Wald F = 6.7,性别交互作用 P = 0.009)。
与男性相比,女性从同等剂量的休闲时间身体活动中获得了更大的全因和心血管疾病死亡率降低获益。这些发现可以通过激励女性参与任何定期的休闲时间身体活动来增强缩小“性别差距”的努力。