Suppr超能文献

体力活动与全因和心血管死亡率关联的性别差异。

Sex Differences in Association of Physical Activity With All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality.

机构信息

Tsinghua Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Feb 27;83(8):783-793. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although physical activity is widely recommended for reducing cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risks, female individuals consistently lag behind male individuals in exercise engagement.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate whether physical activity derived health benefits may differ by sex.

METHODS

In a prospective study of 412,413 U.S. adults (55% female, age 44 ± 17 years) who provided survey data on leisure-time physical activity, we examined sex-specific multivariable-adjusted associations of physical activity measures (frequency, duration, intensity, type) with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality from 1997 through 2019.

RESULTS

During 4,911,178 person-years of follow-up, there were 39,935 all-cause deaths including 11,670 cardiovascular deaths. Regular leisure-time physical activity compared with inactivity was associated with 24% (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73-0.80) and 15% (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.82-0.89) lower risk of all-cause mortality in women and men, respectively (Wald F = 12.0, sex interaction P < 0.001). Men reached their maximal survival benefit of HR 0.81 from 300 min/wk of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, whereas women achieved similar benefit at 140 min/wk and then continued to reach a maximum survival benefit of HR 0.76 also at ∼300 min/wk. Sex-specific findings were similar for cardiovascular death (Wald F = 20.1, sex interaction P < 0.001) and consistent across all measures of aerobic activity as well as muscle strengthening activity (Wald F = 6.7, sex interaction P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Women compared with men derived greater gains in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk reduction from equivalent doses of leisure-time physical activity. These findings could enhance efforts to close the "gender gap" by motivating especially women to engage in any regular leisure-time physical activity.

摘要

背景

尽管身体活动被广泛推荐用于降低心血管疾病和全因死亡率风险,但女性在参与运动方面始终落后于男性。

目的

本研究旨在评估身体活动带来的健康益处是否因性别而异。

方法

在一项对 412,413 名美国成年人(55%为女性,年龄 44 ± 17 岁)的前瞻性研究中,我们根据休闲时间身体活动情况进行了调查,研究了身体活动措施(频率、持续时间、强度、类型)与 1997 年至 2019 年全因和心血管死亡率的性别特异性多变量调整关联。

结果

在 4,911,178 人年的随访期间,共有 39,935 例全因死亡,包括 11,670 例心血管死亡。与不活动相比,定期进行休闲时间身体活动与女性和男性的全因死亡率分别降低 24%(HR:0.76;95%CI:0.73-0.80)和 15%(HR:0.85;95%CI:0.82-0.89)相关(Wald F = 12.0,性别交互作用 P < 0.001)。男性从 300 分钟/周的中等至剧烈身体活动中获得了最大的生存获益,HR 为 0.81,而女性则在 140 分钟/周时达到了类似的获益,然后继续达到了最大的生存获益,HR 为 0.76,也在大约 300 分钟/周时达到。心血管死亡的性别特异性发现(Wald F = 20.1,性别交互作用 P < 0.001)以及所有有氧运动和肌肉强化活动措施的结果均相似(Wald F = 6.7,性别交互作用 P = 0.009)。

结论

与男性相比,女性从同等剂量的休闲时间身体活动中获得了更大的全因和心血管疾病死亡率降低获益。这些发现可以通过激励女性参与任何定期的休闲时间身体活动来增强缩小“性别差距”的努力。

相似文献

1
Sex Differences in Association of Physical Activity With All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Feb 27;83(8):783-793. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.12.019.
2
Long-Term Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intensity and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Cohort of US Adults.
Circulation. 2022 Aug 16;146(7):523-534. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058162. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
7
Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):959-67. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533.

引用本文的文献

2
Cardiovascular contributions to dementia: Examining sex differences and female-specific factors.
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Aug;21(8):e70610. doi: 10.1002/alz.70610.
3
A Comparison of Two Physical Activity Education Programs for Eighth-Grade Students: Effects on Awareness, Performance, and Self-Efficacy.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2025 Jul 24;30(4):600-605. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_434_24. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
9
Walking as a viable alternative to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for improving cardiovascular outcomes in coronary artery disease patients.
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Jun 9;26:200452. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200452. eCollection 2025 Sep.
10
Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Benefits of Physical Activity and Exercise.
Circ Res. 2025 Jul 7;137(2):120-138. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.125.325526. Epub 2025 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

3
Lean body mass and the cardiovascular system constitute a female-specific relationship.
Sci Transl Med. 2022 Oct 19;14(667):eabo2641. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abo2641.
6
What is driving gender inequalities in physical activity among adolescents?
J Sport Health Sci. 2022 Jul;11(4):424-426. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Sex, gender and the pulmonary physiology of exercise.
Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Jan 12;31(163). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0074-2021. Print 2022 Mar 31.
10
Association of Physical Activity Intensity With Mortality: A National Cohort Study of 403 681 US Adults.
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):203-211. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6331.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验