Division of General Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Center for Health Systems Effectiveness, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Aug;163:209363. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209363. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
Despite Medicaid's outsized role in delivering and financing medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), little is known about the extent to which buprenorphine prescriber networks vary across Medicaid health plans, and whether network characteristics affect quality of treatment received. In this observational cross-sectional study, we used 2018-2019 Medicaid claims in Oregon to assess network variation in the numbers and types of buprenorphine prescribers, as well as the association of prescriber and network characteristics with quality of care.
We describe prescribers (MD/DOs and advanced practice providers) of OUD-approved buprenorphine formulations to patients with an OUD diagnosis, across networks. For each patient who initiated buprenorphine treatment during 2018, we assigned a "usual prescriber" and assessed four measures of quality in the 180d following initiation: 1) continuous receipt of buprenorphine; 2) receipt of any behavioral health counseling services; 3) receipt of any urine drug screen; and 4) receipt of any prescription for a benzodiazepine. We used multivariable linear regressions to examine the association of prescriber and network characteristics with quality of buprenorphine care following initiation.
We identified 645 providers who prescribed buprenorphine to 20,739 eligible Medicaid enrollees with an OUD diagnosis. The composition of buprenorphine prescriber networks varied in terms of licensing type, specialty, and panel size, with the majority of prescribers providing buprenorphine to small panels of patients. In the 180 days following initiation, a third of patients were maintained on buprenorphine; 69.9 % received behavioral health counseling; 88.4 % had a urine drug screen; and 11.3 % received a benzodiazepine prescription. In regression analyses, while no single network characteristic was associated with higher quality across all examined measures, each one unit increase in prescriber-to-enrollee ratio was associated with a 1.18 p.p. increase in the probability of continuous buprenorphine maintenance during the 180 days following initiation (95 % confidence interval = [0.21, 2.15], p = 0.017).
Medicaid plans may be able to leverage their networks to provide higher quality care. Our findings, which should be interpreted as descriptive only, suggest that higher prescriber-to-enrollee ratio is associated with increased buprenorphine maintenance. Future research should focus on isolating the causal relationships between MOUD prescribing network design and patient outcomes.
尽管医疗补助计划在提供和资助阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物方面发挥了巨大作用,但对于丁丙诺啡处方者网络在各州医疗补助计划中的差异程度,以及网络特征是否会影响所接受治疗的质量,人们知之甚少。在这项观察性横断面研究中,我们使用了 2018 年至 2019 年俄勒冈州的医疗补助索赔数据,评估了接受阿片类药物使用障碍诊断的患者的丁丙诺啡处方者数量和类型的网络差异,以及处方者和网络特征与护理质量的关联。
我们描述了在网络中为接受阿片类药物使用障碍批准的丁丙诺啡制剂的患者开具处方的 MD/DO 和高级执业医师。对于在 2018 年期间开始丁丙诺啡治疗的每位患者,我们指定了一名“常规处方者”,并在开始后的 180 天内评估了四种护理质量指标:1)持续接受丁丙诺啡治疗;2)接受任何行为健康咨询服务;3)接受任何尿液药物检测;4)接受任何苯二氮䓬类药物处方。我们使用多变量线性回归来检查处方者和网络特征与起始后丁丙诺啡护理质量的关联。
我们确定了 645 名向 20739 名有阿片类药物使用障碍诊断的合格医疗补助受助人开具丁丙诺啡的提供者。丁丙诺啡处方者网络的组成在许可类型、专业和小组规模方面存在差异,大多数处方者向小部分患者提供丁丙诺啡。在开始后的 180 天内,三分之一的患者继续接受丁丙诺啡治疗;69.9%接受了行为健康咨询;88.4%进行了尿液药物检测;11.3%接受了苯二氮䓬类药物处方。在回归分析中,虽然没有单个网络特征与所有检查指标的更高质量相关,但每个被调查者与提供者的比例增加一个单位,与 180 天内持续丁丙诺啡维持的概率增加 1.18 个百分点相关(95%置信区间为[0.21, 2.15],p=0.017)。
医疗补助计划可能能够利用其网络提供更高质量的护理。我们的研究结果仅具有描述性,表明较高的被调查者与提供者比例与增加丁丙诺啡维持相关。未来的研究应集中于确定 MOUD 处方网络设计与患者结果之间的因果关系。