Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Laboratorio de Sostenibilidad y Cambio Climático, Av. General Ramón Corona 2514, Zapopan, Jalisco 45138, Mexico.
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Sep 20;944:173735. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173735. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
Environmental concerns about microplastics (MPs) have motivated research of their sources, occurrence, and fate in aquatic and soil ecosystems. To mitigate the environmental impact of MPs, biodegradable plastics are designed to naturally decompose, thus reducing the amount of environmental plastic contamination. However, the environmental fate of biodegradable plastics and the products of their incomplete biodegradation, especially micro-biodegradable plastics (MBPs), remains largely unexplored. This comprehensive review aims to assess the risks of unintended consequences associated with the introduction of biodegradable plastics into the environment, namely, whether the incomplete mineralization of biodegradable plastics could enhance the risk of MBPs formation and thus, exacerbate the problem of their environmental dispersion, representing a potentially additional environmental hazard due to their presumed ecotoxicity. Initial evidence points towards the potential for incomplete mineralization of biodegradable plastics under both controlled and uncontrolled conditions. Rapid degradation of PLA in thermophilic industrial composting contrasts with the degradation below 50 % of other biodegradables, suggesting MBPs released into the environment through compost. Moreover, degradation rates of <60 % in anaerobic digestion for polymers other than PLA and PHAs suggest a heightened risk of MBPs in digestate, risking their spread into soil and water. This could increase MBPs and adsorbed pollutants' mobilization. The exact behavior and impacts of additive leachates from faster-degrading plastics remain largely unknown. Thus, assessing the environmental fate and impacts of MBPs-laden by-products like compost or digestate is crucial. Moreover, the ecotoxicological consequences of shifting from conventional plastics to biodegradable ones are highly uncertain, as there is insufficient evidence to claim that MBPs have a milder effect on ecosystem health. Indeed, literature shows that the impact may be worse depending on the exposed species, polymer type, and the ecosystem complexity.
人们对微塑料(MPs)的环境问题感到担忧,这促使人们对其在水生和土壤生态系统中的来源、存在和命运进行了研究。为了减轻 MPs 对环境的影响,设计了可生物降解塑料以使其自然分解,从而减少环境中塑料污染的数量。然而,可生物降解塑料及其不完全生物降解产物(尤其是微生物可降解塑料(MBPs))的环境归宿仍在很大程度上未被探索。本综述旨在评估将可生物降解塑料引入环境中所带来的意外后果的风险,即可生物降解塑料的不完全矿化是否会增加形成 MBPs 的风险,从而加剧其环境分散的问题,因为它们被认为具有生态毒性,这可能代表着一种潜在的额外环境危害。初步证据表明,可生物降解塑料在受控和不受控条件下都可能不完全矿化。PLA 在高温工业堆肥中的快速降解与其他可生物降解塑料降解率低于 50%形成鲜明对比,这表明通过堆肥释放到环境中的 MBPs。此外,除 PLA 和 PHAs 之外的聚合物在厌氧消化中的降解率<60%表明消化物中存在更高的 MBPs 风险,这有可能将其传播到土壤和水中。这可能会增加 MBPs 和吸附污染物的迁移。从降解速度较快的塑料中浸出添加剂的具体行为和影响在很大程度上仍然未知。因此,评估含有 MBPs 的副产物(如堆肥或消化物)的环境归宿和影响至关重要。此外,从传统塑料向可生物降解塑料转变的生态毒理学后果具有高度不确定性,因为没有足够的证据表明 MBPs 对生态系统健康的影响更轻微。事实上,文献表明,这种影响可能更糟,具体取决于暴露的物种、聚合物类型和生态系统的复杂性。