Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in the Tropics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Department of Ecology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in the Tropics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Department of Ecology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Centre of Modern Eco-agriculture and Circular Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Sep 15;477:135129. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135129. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
The increasing accumulation of microplastics (MPs) in agroecosystems has raised significant environmental and public health concerns, facilitating the application of biodegradable plastics. However, the comparative effects of conventional and biodegradable MPs in agroecosystem are still far from fully understood. Here we developed microcosm experiments to reveal the ecological effects of conventional (polyethylene [PE] and polypropylene [PP]) and biodegradable (polyadipate/butylene terephthalate [PBAT] and polycaprolactone [PCL]) MPs (0, 1%, 5%; w/w) in the maize-soil ecosystem. We found that PCL MPs reduced plant production by 73.6-75.2%, while PE, PP and PBAT MPs elicited almost negligible change. The addition of PCL MPs decreased specific enzyme activities critical for soil nutrients cycling by 71.5-95.3%. Biodegradable MPs tended to reduce bacterial α-diversity. The 1% treatments of PE and PBAT, and PCL enhanced bacterial networks complexity, whereas 5% of PE and PBAT, and PP had adverse effect. Moreover, biodegradable MPs appeared to reduce the α-diversity and networks complexity of fungal community. Overall, PCL reduced the ecosystem multifunctionality, mainly by inhibiting the microbial metabolic activity. This study offers evidence that biodegradable MPs can impair agroecosystem multifunctionality, and highlights the potential risks to replace the conventional plastics by biodegradable ones in agricultural practices.
越来越多的微塑料(MPs)在农业生态系统中积累,引起了人们对环境和公共健康的关注,这促使人们开始应用可生物降解塑料。然而,可生物降解和不可生物降解 MPs 对农业生态系统的影响仍远未完全了解。在这里,我们开发了微宇宙实验来揭示常规 MPs(聚乙烯[PE]和聚丙烯[PP])和可生物降解 MPs(聚己二酸/对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯[PBAT]和聚己内酯[PCL])(0、1%、5%;w/w)在玉米-土壤生态系统中的生态效应。我们发现 PCL MPs 使植物产量减少了 73.6-75.2%,而 PE、PP 和 PBAT MPs 的影响几乎可以忽略不计。PCL MPs 的添加使土壤养分循环关键的特定酶活性降低了 71.5-95.3%。可生物降解 MPs 往往会降低细菌 α 多样性。1%的 PE 和 PBAT 以及 PCL 处理增强了细菌网络的复杂性,而 5%的 PE、PBAT 和 PP 则产生了不良影响。此外,可生物降解 MPs 似乎降低了真菌群落的 α 多样性和网络复杂性。总的来说,PCL 降低了生态系统的多功能性,主要是通过抑制微生物的代谢活性。本研究提供的证据表明,可生物降解 MPs 会损害农业生态系统的多功能性,并强调了在农业实践中用可生物降解塑料替代传统塑料的潜在风险。