Li Yonghan, Chai Chloe Soo Suan, Koh Chin Koon Alex, Chan Chi Ho
Department of Anesthesiology, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Department of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 25;16(9):e70147. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70147. eCollection 2024 Sep.
The use of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) has been widely encouraged for hip surgery; however, meta-analyses showed mixed results in terms of its efficacy in reduction in analgesic consumption and pain score. These meta-analyses included all forms of FICB approaches, which may diminish the effect size of the therapy. Suprainguinal FICB (s-FICB) has been shown to be superior to other FICB approaches including the ultrasound-guided infrainguinal approach and the landmark approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare opioid consumption, pain score, and complications after s-FICB to control for patients undergoing hip surgery. The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42023460377). We performed a systematic literature search in Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases from inception to 16 August 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of s-FICB versus control for patients undergoing hip surgery. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers, and disagreements were resolved by consensus or by discussion with a third investigator. The primary outcome is the 24-hour oral morphine equivalent daily dose (oMMED). The secondary outcome includes oMMED at different timepoints, and pain score. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (Cochrane, London, England) was used to assess the risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was assessed via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model. Trial sequence analysis is performed on opioid consumption 24 hours post operation. Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Arthroscopic hip surgery was performed in three studies involving 222 patients, hip and femur fracture surgeries were performed in three studies involving 149 patients, and total hip arthroplasty was performed in five studies involving 483 patients. In studies involving arthroscopic hip surgery, s-FICB did not improve intra-operative and post-operative opioid consumption and post-operative pain score. In studies involving hip and femur fracture surgeries, s-FICB was associated with a non-significant difference in opioid consumption at 24 hours after surgery and post-operative pain score at 12 hours and 24 hours after surgery. However, the result of the trial sequential analysis (TSA) was not definitive, indicating that additional research is necessary to draw conclusive outcomes. In studies involving total hip arthroplasty, s-FICB was associated with a significant reduction in post-operative opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours with conclusive results in trial sequential analysis. In conclusion, s-FICB is superior to placebo for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. For patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery, s-FICB is unlikely to be beneficial. With regard to hip fracture surgery, additional research is necessary to draw conclusive outcomes.
髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)已被广泛推荐用于髋关节手术;然而,荟萃分析显示,在减少镇痛药物用量和疼痛评分方面,其疗效存在差异。这些荟萃分析涵盖了所有形式的FICB方法,这可能会降低该疗法的效应量。腹股沟上FICB(s-FICB)已被证明优于其他FICB方法,包括超声引导下腹股沟下方法和体表定位法。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较s-FICB与对照组在髋关节手术患者中的阿片类药物用量、疼痛评分及并发症情况。该研究方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)注册(注册号CRD42023460377)。我们在医学文献分析和联机检索系统(MEDLINE)、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)电子数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,检索时间从数据库建立至2023年8月16日,以识别评估s-FICB与对照组对髋关节手术患者疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。由两名评价员独立提取数据,分歧通过协商一致或与第三位研究者讨论解决。主要结局指标是24小时口服吗啡等效日剂量(oMMED)。次要结局指标包括不同时间点的oMMED和疼痛评分。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(英国伦敦Cochrane)评估偏倚风险。通过推荐分级的评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性。采用随机效应模型对数据进行综合分析。对术后24小时的阿片类药物用量进行试验序贯分析。共纳入11项随机对照试验。3项研究(涉及222例患者)进行了关节镜下髋关节手术,3项研究(涉及149例患者)进行了髋部和股骨骨折手术,5项研究(涉及共483例患者)进行了全髋关节置换术。在涉及关节镜下髋关节手术的研究中,s-FICB并未改善术中及术后阿片类药物用量和术后疼痛评分。在涉及髋部和股骨骨折手术的研究中,s-FICB与术后24小时阿片类药物用量、术后12小时和24小时疼痛评分的差异无统计学意义。然而,试验序贯分析(TSA)的结果并不明确,表明需要更多研究才能得出确凿结论。在涉及全髋关节置换术的研究中,s-FICB与术后24小时和48小时阿片类药物用量显著减少相关,试验序贯分析结果确凿。总之,对于接受全髋关节置换术的患者,s-FICB优于安慰剂。对于接受关节镜下髋关节手术的患者,s-FICB不太可能有益。对于髋部骨折手术,需要更多研究才能得出确凿结论。