Pellegrino B, Capoluongo E D, Bagnoli M, Arenare L, Califano D, Scambia G, Cecere S C, Silini E M, Scaglione G L, Spina A, Tognon G, Campanini N, Pisano C, Russo D, Pettinato A, Scollo P, Iemmolo R, De Cecco L, Musolino A, Marchini S, Beltrame L, Paracchini L, Perrone F, Mezzanzanica D, Pignata S
Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy; Breast Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy; Department of Clinical Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy.
ESMO Open. 2025 Jan;10(1):104091. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104091. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Ovarian cancer (OvC) constitutes significant management challenges primarily due to its late-stage diagnosis and the development of resistance to chemotherapy. The standard treatment regimen typically includes carboplatin and paclitaxel, with the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. However, the variability in treatment responses suggests the need to investigate factors beyond BRCA1/2 mutations, such as DNA repair mechanisms and epigenetic alterations. Notably, homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) is observed in an additional 20% of HGSOC cases, indicating a broader spectrum of DNA repair defects. Existing commercial HRD assays have certain limitations, prompting a global effort to develop new genomic and functional tests through academic research.
This study investigates, in the 187 high-grade serous and endometrioid tumors from the MITO16/MaNGO-OV-2 trial, academic HRD genomic tests in conjunction with a RAD51 immunofluorescence assay to assess functional activation of HRD. Additionally, the study incorporates analysis of microRNA-506 (miR-506) expression as a putative epigenetic effector.
The RAD51 test identified HRD in 73% of the samples and genomic HRD testing in 57%, with HRD identified in 45% of samples by both tests. The significant discrepancy between the two assays emphasizes the need to refine tumor classification for HRD. A three-group genomic classification unveiled superior progression-free survival (PFS) in high- and mild-HRD tumors compared with negative-HRD tumors. High concordance between RAD51 and genomic testing in high-HRD tumors suggests a subset of 'super-HRD' tumors exhibiting superior PFS. High expression of miR-506 may be used to further refine HRD status.
The study underscores the complexities of HRD assessment and advocates for a combined genomic and functional approach to enhance predictive accuracy in OvC treatment responses.
卵巢癌(OvC)构成了重大的管理挑战,主要原因是其晚期诊断以及对化疗产生耐药性。标准治疗方案通常包括卡铂和紫杉醇,对于携带BRCA1/2突变的高级别浆液性卵巢癌(HGSOC)患者,还会添加聚(ADP - 核糖)聚合酶抑制剂。然而,治疗反应的变异性表明需要研究BRCA1/2突变以外的因素,如DNA修复机制和表观遗传改变。值得注意的是,在另外20%的HGSOC病例中观察到同源重组修复缺陷(HRD),这表明DNA修复缺陷的范围更广。现有的商业HRD检测存在一定局限性,促使全球通过学术研究努力开发新的基因组和功能测试。
本研究在MITO16/MaNGO - OV - 2试验的187例高级别浆液性和子宫内膜样肿瘤中,研究学术性HRD基因组测试与RAD51免疫荧光检测相结合,以评估HRD的功能激活。此外,该研究纳入了对微小RNA - 506(miR - 506)表达的分析,将其作为一种假定的表观遗传效应物。
RAD51检测在73%的样本中鉴定出HRD,基因组HRD检测在57%的样本中鉴定出HRD,两种检测方法在45%的样本中均鉴定出HRD。两种检测方法之间的显著差异强调了细化HRD肿瘤分类的必要性。一种三组基因组分类显示,与HRD阴性肿瘤相比,HRD高和HRD轻度肿瘤的无进展生存期(PFS)更长。HRD高的肿瘤中RAD51检测与基因组检测高度一致,表明存在一部分“超级HRD”肿瘤,其PFS更佳。miR - 506的高表达可用于进一步细化HRD状态。
该研究强调了HRD评估的复杂性,并主张采用基因组和功能相结合的方法来提高卵巢癌治疗反应的预测准确性。