Suppr超能文献

达雷妥尤单抗/来那度胺/地塞米松用于不适合移植的新诊断骨髓瘤:MAIA研究的长期结果

Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes.

作者信息

Facon Thierry, Moreau Philippe, Weisel Katja, Goldschmidt Hartmut, Usmani Saad Z, Chari Ajai, Plesner Torben, Orlowski Robert Z, Bahlis Nizar, Basu Supratik, Hulin Cyrille, Quach Hang, O'Dwyer Michael, Perrot Aurore, Jacquet Caroline, Venner Christopher P, Raje Noopur, Tiab Mourad, Macro Margaret, Frenzel Laurent, Leleu Xavier, Cook Gordon, Wang George, Pei Huiling, Krevvata Maria, Carson Robin, Borgsten Fredrik, Kumar Shaji K

机构信息

University of Lille, CHU Lille, Service des Maladies du Sang, Lille, France.

Hematology Department, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2025 Apr;39(4):942-950. doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02505-2. Epub 2025 Feb 27.

Abstract

In the MAIA study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report updated efficacy and safety from MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), including a subgroup analysis by patient age (<70, ≥70 to <75, ≥75, and ≥80 years). Overall, 737 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint, PFS, was improved with D-Rd versus Rd (median, 61.9 vs 34.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.67; P < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the D-Rd group versus 65.5 months in the Rd group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.83; P = 0.0003); estimated 60-month OS rates were 66.6% and 53.6%, respectively. D-Rd achieved higher rates of complete response or better (≥CR; 51.1% vs 30.1%), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (32.1% vs 11.1%), and sustained MRD negativity (≥18 months: 16.8% vs 3.3%) versus Rd (all P < 0.0001). D-Rd demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy benefits across age groups. No new safety concerns were observed. Updated results (median follow-up, >5 years) continue to support frontline use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM.

摘要

在MAIA研究中,与单独使用来那度胺和地塞米松(Rd)相比,达雷妥尤单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松(D-Rd)可改善新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)且不符合移植条件患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。我们报告了MAIA研究的最新疗效和安全性(中位随访时间为64.5个月),包括按患者年龄(<70岁、≥70至<75岁、≥75岁和≥80岁)进行的亚组分析。总体而言,737例不符合移植条件的NDMM患者按1:1随机分组接受D-Rd或Rd治疗。主要终点PFS方面,D-Rd组优于Rd组(中位值分别为61.9个月和34.4个月;风险比[HR]为0.55;95%置信区间[CI]为0.45-0.67;P < 0.0001)。D-Rd组未达到中位OS,而Rd组为65.5个月(HR为0.66;95%CI为0.53-0.83;P = 0.0003);估计60个月的OS率分别为66.6%和53.6%。与Rd组相比,D-Rd组达到完全缓解或更好缓解(≥CR)的比例更高(51.1%对30.1%)、微小残留病(MRD)阴性率更高(32.1%对11.1%)以及持续MRD阴性率更高(≥18个月:16.8%对3.3%)(所有P < 0.0001)。D-Rd在各年龄组均显示出具有临床意义的疗效优势。未观察到新的安全性问题。最新结果(中位随访时间>5年)继续支持在不符合移植条件的NDMM患者中一线使用D-Rd。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7a2/11976258/6a62d568a582/41375_2024_2505_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验