Zhu Shihao, Zhang Runshuai, Yao Luxia, Lin Zhirong, Li Yanjie, Li Siyuan, Wu Lianfeng
Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Key Laboratory of Growth Regulation and Translational Research of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Commun Biol. 2025 Apr 2;8(1):545. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07984-2.
To secure an adequate nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) supply for survival, organisms typically rely on two complementary mechanisms: the de novo synthesis pathway and the salvage pathway. Notably, the classic quinolinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase (QPRTase) for de novo NAD synthesis is absent in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), despite the reported alternative mechanism involving uridine monophosphate phosphoribosyltransferase (UMPS). However, the effectiveness of this proposed mechanism for NAD production of C. elegans remains unclear. Here, using a chemically defined medium, we observed that removing NAD salvage precursors from the medium results in a significant decrease in NAD levels, causing severe developmental delay and fecundity loss in C. elegans. Strikingly, these defects cannot be restored by any metabolites from the de novo synthesis pathway, including the direct QPRTase substrate quinolinic acid (QA). Furthermore, the deficiency of umps-1 does not cause any significant changes in the NAD levels of C. elegans. Moreover, the growth defects of the umps-1 mutant could be rescued by uridine, but not the salvage NAD supply. Additionally, we discovered that commercially available QA products contain substantial amounts of nicotinic acid, potentially producing misleading information. Collectively, our results demonstrate that C. elegans lacks the necessary mechanisms for de novo synthesis of NAD.
为确保有足够的烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(NAD)供应以维持生存,生物体通常依赖两种互补机制:从头合成途径和补救途径。值得注意的是,秀丽隐杆线虫(C. elegans)中不存在用于从头合成NAD的经典喹啉酸磷酸核糖基转移酶(QPRTase),尽管有报道称存在涉及尿苷单磷酸磷酸核糖基转移酶(UMPS)的替代机制。然而,这种提出的机制对秀丽隐杆线虫NAD产生的有效性仍不清楚。在这里,使用化学成分确定的培养基,我们观察到从培养基中去除NAD补救前体导致NAD水平显著降低,从而导致秀丽隐杆线虫出现严重的发育延迟和繁殖力丧失。令人惊讶的是,这些缺陷不能通过从头合成途径的任何代谢物恢复,包括直接的QPRTase底物喹啉酸(QA)。此外,umps - 1的缺陷不会导致秀丽隐杆线虫NAD水平发生任何显著变化。而且,umps - 1突变体的生长缺陷可以通过尿苷挽救,但不能通过补救性NAD供应挽救。此外,我们发现市售的QA产品含有大量烟酸,可能会产生误导性信息。总的来说,我们的结果表明秀丽隐杆线虫缺乏从头合成NAD的必要机制。