Li Xuefeng, Liang Yumeng, Zhang Yu, Fa Botao, Liu Zheyi, Cui Lu, Xi Miaomiao, Feng Shufeng, Xu Li, Liu Xiaoxiao, Xiao Zhengtao, Liu Shengwang, Li Hai
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, PR China.
Division of Avian Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Animal Disease Control and Prevention, National Poultry Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, PR China.
NPJ Vaccines. 2025 May 18;10(1):99. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01154-5.
Biosafe and effective vaccines are urgently needed for the prevention and control of avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), the first coronavirus to be discovered, despite extensive vaccination for decades. However, their development has been hindered by our limited understanding of prime vaccination, which is crucial for rational vaccine design. Here, we constructed in vivo dynamic single-cell resolution blood immune landscapes of chickens immunized with live-attenuated or inactivated IBV. Bioinformatic analysis together with in vivo examination revealed that live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines reshaped lymphocytes and led to identical compositions through different mechanisms. Inactivated vaccines activate T lymphocytes through dendritic cells with subsequent T lymphocyte-dependent B lymphocyte expansion upon prime vaccination but induce pathogen-specific antibodies only after boost vaccination. Prime vaccination with a live-attenuated vaccine led to an initial preference for monocytes/macrophages as antigen-presenting cells (APCs), followed by extensive activation of the main APCs, which facilitated rapid T lymphocyte expansion and elicited satisfactory humoral immunity. Along with the disparate utilization of APCs, live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines yielded distinct TCR repertoires and triggered different B lymphocyte dynamics despite their similar final BCR repertoires. Furthermore, APC preference correlated with vaccine effectiveness rather than modality, as prime avian influenza vaccination triggered effective adaptive immune responses with the same APC preference as live-attenuated IBV did. This study comprehensively characterized avian coronavirus prime vaccination and highlighted the key role of APC preference.
尽管数十年来一直在广泛接种疫苗,但仍迫切需要生物安全且有效的疫苗来预防和控制禽传染性支气管炎病毒(IBV),这是最早被发现的冠状病毒。然而,我们对初次免疫接种的了解有限,这阻碍了疫苗的研发,而初次免疫接种对于合理设计疫苗至关重要。在此,我们构建了用减毒活疫苗或灭活IBV免疫的鸡的体内动态单细胞分辨率血液免疫图谱。生物信息学分析与体内检查表明,减毒活疫苗和灭活疫苗重塑了淋巴细胞,并通过不同机制导致相同的组成。灭活疫苗在初次接种时通过树突状细胞激活T淋巴细胞,随后T淋巴细胞依赖性B淋巴细胞扩增,但仅在加强接种后才诱导产生病原体特异性抗体。用减毒活疫苗进行初次接种导致最初优先选择单核细胞/巨噬细胞作为抗原呈递细胞(APC),随后主要APC被广泛激活,这促进了T淋巴细胞的快速扩增并引发了令人满意的体液免疫。尽管减毒活疫苗和灭活疫苗最终的BCR库相似,但由于APC的使用不同,它们产生了不同的TCR库并引发了不同的B淋巴细胞动态变化。此外,APC偏好与疫苗效力相关而非与疫苗类型相关,因为初次接种禽流感疫苗引发了有效的适应性免疫反应,其APC偏好与减毒活IBV疫苗相同。本研究全面表征了禽冠状病毒的初次免疫接种,并突出了APC偏好的关键作用。