De Guzman Clarissa, Daque Ma Gladys Nicole, Lopez March Helena Jane, Cuachin Anna Maureen, Crisostomo Maria Vinna, Ylade Michelle, Deen Jacqueline
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines-Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;13:1566688. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566688. eCollection 2025.
Nasopharyngeal (NPS) and oropharyngeal (OPS) swab collection are vital in the diagnosis and surveillance of respiratory viruses. However, the acceptability of these procedures among children remains a challenge.
We conducted a descriptive study using data from two pediatric observational studies in Cebu, Philippines (July 2021-October 2022). One was a community-based study, involving febrile adolescents aged 13-19 years, and the other was a hospital-based study, involving febrile children aged 1 month to <5 years. Both studies aimed to collect NPS/OPS samples for respiratory pathogen testing, including SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and respiratory syncytial virus. We described reasons for refusal of NPS/OPS collection obtained from parents or guardians who were approached for participation in these studies.
Among 180 children enrolled from study sites in Bogo and Balamban Cebu, 134 (74.4%) were from the community-based study and 46 (25.6%) from the hospital-based study. Twenty-nine (29/180; 16.1%) agreed to undergo NPS/OPS collection-all of whom were from the community-based study. None of the hospital-based participants agreed to undergo NPS/OPS collection as part of their participation in the study. Among the 151/180 (83.90%) participants who refused the research swab collection, 41 (27.2%) declined due to a prior swab, 31 (20.5%) cited fear or discomfort, and 28 (18.5%) felt it was unnecessary at the time.
NPS/OPS collection was less acceptable in both community and hospital settings, unless mandated by local authorities based on the experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior swabbing, procedural discomfort, and perceived lack of necessity were key barriers, especially among younger children and their caregivers.
鼻咽拭子(NPS)和口咽拭子(OPS)采集对于呼吸道病毒的诊断和监测至关重要。然而,这些操作在儿童中的可接受性仍然是一个挑战。
我们使用来自菲律宾宿务的两项儿科观察性研究(2021年7月至2022年10月)的数据进行了一项描述性研究。一项是基于社区的研究,涉及13至19岁的发热青少年,另一项是基于医院的研究,涉及1个月至不满5岁的发热儿童。两项研究的目的都是采集NPS/OPS样本进行呼吸道病原体检测,包括严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)、甲型/乙型流感病毒和呼吸道合胞病毒。我们描述了从被邀请参与这些研究的父母或监护人那里获得的拒绝NPS/OPS采集的原因。
在从宿务博戈和巴兰班的研究地点招募的180名儿童中,134名(74.4%)来自基于社区的研究,46名(25.6%)来自基于医院的研究。29名(29/180;16.1%)同意接受NPS/OPS采集,他们全部来自基于社区的研究。没有一名基于医院的参与者同意接受NPS/OPS采集作为其参与研究的一部分。在151/180(83.90%)拒绝研究拭子采集的参与者中,41名(27.2%)因之前已进行拭子采集而拒绝,31名(20.5%)表示害怕或感到不适,28名(18.5%)认为当时没有必要。
除非当地政府根据2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的经验强制要求,否则NPS/OPS采集在社区和医院环境中的可接受性都较低。之前的拭子采集、操作不适以及认为没有必要是主要障碍,尤其是在年幼儿童及其照顾者中。