Whitley Sophie, Hawkins Rachel L, Davies Jennifer C, Cao Jiexin, Malcomson Lee, Crosbie Emma J, McWilliams Lorna
Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70338. doi: 10.1111/hex.70338.
Research indicates disproportionately low cervical screening uptake by diverse ethnic groups in England. If acceptable, self-sampling might address population-specific barriers and improve screening uptake. The Alternative CErvical Screening (ACES) Diversity study aimed to explore the prospective acceptability of self-sampling (urine sampling and self-swabbing), as an alternative to current cervical screening, among women from diverse ethnic groups.
A qualitative study design was employed using focus groups. Forty-eight women from diverse ethnic groups were recruited via community partners in Northwest England and a cross-sectional survey. Eight focus groups were conducted (one online and seven in-person; four with interpreters for Mandarin, Cantonese, Polish and Urdu). Data were transcribed, translated and analysed in English using thematic framework analysis guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.
Three themes were identified. 'Cultural considerations' explored how aspects of culture and faith influenced perceptions of self-sampling. 'Desire for comfort and control' reflected views of how self-sampling increases autonomy by maintaining privacy, potentially reducing both pain and tension associated with screening. 'Confidence in testing' illustrates beliefs about self-sampling, around ease of use, practical challenges and accuracy concerns.
Self-sampling for cervical screening was considered highly acceptable. If introduced, self-sampling could increase cervical screening uptake amongst women from diverse ethnic groups. Having a choice in how to interact with the screening programme and continuing to raise awareness of cervical screening were considered important. Future research should explore the concurrent or retrospective acceptability of urine self-sampling for cervical screening.
Multiple public involvement discussion sessions in Northwest England-based community centres were arranged with women to explore and build understanding about cervical screening and speak about the ACES Diversity study. A further session was held, with an interpreter, to discuss the focus group topic guide and study design with women and create an opportunity for any feedback. Written feedback was provided for the recruitment poster from seven women (two East Asian, two Central and Eastern European, two African-Caribbean and one South Asian).
研究表明,英格兰不同种族群体的宫颈癌筛查参与率低得不成比例。如果可以接受,自我采样可能会消除特定人群的障碍并提高筛查参与率。替代性宫颈癌筛查(ACES)多样性研究旨在探讨自我采样(尿液采样和自我擦拭)作为当前宫颈癌筛查替代方法在不同种族群体女性中的前瞻性可接受性。
采用焦点小组进行定性研究设计。通过英格兰西北部的社区合作伙伴和横断面调查招募了48名不同种族群体的女性。进行了8次焦点小组讨论(1次在线讨论和7次面对面讨论;4次讨论配有普通话、粤语、波兰语和乌尔都语的口译员)。数据使用由可接受性理论框架指导的主题框架分析方法以英文进行转录、翻译和分析。
确定了三个主题。“文化考量”探讨了文化和信仰方面如何影响对自我采样的看法。“对舒适和掌控的渴望”反映了关于自我采样如何通过保持隐私增加自主性的观点,这可能会减轻与筛查相关的疼痛和紧张感。“对检测的信心”阐述了围绕自我采样在易用性、实际挑战和准确性方面的信念。
宫颈癌筛查的自我采样被认为是高度可接受的。如果采用,自我采样可以提高不同种族群体女性的宫颈癌筛查参与率。在如何与筛查项目互动方面有选择以及持续提高宫颈癌筛查意识被认为很重要。未来的研究应探讨尿液自我采样用于宫颈癌筛查的同时或回顾性可接受性。
在英格兰西北部的社区中心安排了多次公众参与讨论会,与女性探讨并增进对宫颈癌筛查的理解,并谈论ACES多样性研究。还举行了一次配有口译员的会议,与女性讨论焦点小组主题指南和研究设计,并为她们提供反馈机会。七名女性(两名东亚女性、两名中东欧女性、两名非裔加勒比女性和一名南亚女性)对招募海报提供了书面反馈。