Orazumbekova Binur, Hamdani Tooba, Hodgson Sam, Samuel Miriam, Stow Daniel, Spreckley Marie, Finer Sarah, Siddiqui Moneeza K, Mathur Rohini
Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1038/s41366-025-01848-9.
Evidence on ethnic differences in factors associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is mixed. We aimed to systematically review evidence on ethnic variations in the relationships between routinely recorded demographic and clinical factors and T2D.
We searched Medline Complete and Embase for observational studies published between 1990 and 2023 investigating ethnic differences in factors routinely recorded in clinical encounters associated with T2D. We used random and fixed-effects meta-analysis to quantitatively summarise effect sizes across studies where possible. Risk of bias and study quality were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute tool. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023394148.
Searches identified 10,694 studies, of which, 54 (n = 10 332,949 individuals) were eligible for inclusion, including 12 suitable for meta-analysis. Included studies reported ethnic differences in age at T2D diagnosis, anthropometric measures, and factors associated with women's health. Compared to individuals of White ethnicity, people of diverse ethnic backgrounds had 2-4-fold higher incidence and prevalence of T2D and younger age of onset. Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was a better discriminator of T2D across all ethnic groups compared to body mass index (BMI). While the association between overweight/obese BMI and T2D was strongest for people of White ethnicity (OR 4.85 CI 3.53-6.68) followed by Black (OR 3.27 CI 2.48-4.30) and East Asian ethnicities (OR 3.06 CI 2.29-4.16), the association between WHR and T2D was strongest for people of Black (OR 2.74, CI 2.22-3.39) than for White ethnicities (OR 2.51, CI 2.30-2.74). Included studies highlighted the emerging importance of women-health-associated factors such as index of parity, birth weight and breastfeeding, especially among women of diverse ethnicities.
Ratio measures of central adiposity may better identify T2D in ethnically diverse populations than measures of overall adiposity. Sex-specific factors must be considered when assessing T2D risk.
Wellcome Trust Grant 218584/Z/19/Z.
关于2型糖尿病(T2D)相关因素的种族差异的证据并不一致。我们旨在系统回顾常规记录的人口统计学和临床因素与T2D之间关系的种族差异证据。
我们检索了Medline Complete和Embase,查找1990年至2023年发表的观察性研究,这些研究调查了临床就诊中常规记录的与T2D相关因素的种族差异。我们尽可能使用随机和固定效应荟萃分析来定量汇总各研究的效应大小。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所工具评估偏倚风险和研究质量。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023394148。
检索到10694项研究,其中54项(n = 10332949人)符合纳入标准,包括12项适合进行荟萃分析。纳入研究报告了T2D诊断年龄、人体测量指标以及与女性健康相关因素方面的种族差异。与白人相比,不同种族背景的人T2D发病率和患病率高出2至4倍,且发病年龄更小。与体重指数(BMI)相比,腰臀比(WHR)在所有种族中对T2D的区分能力更强。虽然超重/肥胖BMI与T2D之间的关联在白人中最强(OR 4.85,CI 3.53 - 6.68),其次是黑人(OR 3.27,CI 2.48 - 4.30)和东亚种族(OR 3.06,CI 2.29 - 4.16),但WHR与T2D之间的关联在黑人中(OR 2.74,CI 2.22 - 3.39)比在白人中(OR 2.51,CI 2.30 - 2.74)更强。纳入研究强调了与女性健康相关因素如产次指数、出生体重和母乳喂养的重要性日益凸显,尤其是在不同种族的女性中。
与总体肥胖指标相比,中心性肥胖的比值测量可能在不同种族人群中更能准确识别T2D。评估T2D风险时必须考虑性别特异性因素。
惠康信托基金资助218584/Z/19/Z。