Suppr超能文献

昼夜节律对经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)效果的影响:理论与实践考量

The Influence of Circadian Rhythms on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Effects: Theoretical and Practical Considerations.

作者信息

Chmiel James, Malinowska Agnieszka

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Culture and Health, Institute of Physical Culture Sciences, University of Szczecin, Al. Piastów 40B Block 6, 71-065 Szczecin, Poland.

Institute of Psychology, University of Szczecin, 71-017 Szczecin, Poland.

出版信息

Cells. 2025 Jul 25;14(15):1152. doi: 10.3390/cells14151152.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modulate cortical excitability in a polarity-specific manner, yet identical protocols often produce inconsistent outcomes across sessions or individuals. This narrative review proposes that much of this variability arises from the brain's intrinsic temporal landscape. Integrating evidence from chronobiology, sleep research, and non-invasive brain stimulation, we argue that tDCS produces reliable, polarity-specific after-effects only within a circadian-homeostatic "window of efficacy". On the circadian (Process C) axis, intrinsic alertness, membrane depolarisation, and glutamatergic gain rise in the late biological morning and early evening, whereas pre-dawn phases are marked by reduced excitability and heightened inhibition. On the homeostatic (Process S) axis, consolidated sleep renormalises synaptic weights, widening the capacity for further potentiation, whereas prolonged wakefulness saturates plasticity and can even reverse the usual anodal/cathodal polarity rules. Human stimulation studies mirror this two-process fingerprint: sleep deprivation abolishes anodal long-term-potentiation-like effects and converts cathodal inhibition into facilitation, while stimulating at each participant's chronotype-aligned (phase-aligned) peak time amplifies and prolongs after-effects even under equal sleep pressure. From these observations we derive practical recommendations: (i) schedule excitatory tDCS after restorative sleep and near the individual wake-maintenance zone; (ii) avoid sessions at high sleep pressure or circadian troughs; (iii) log melatonin phase, chronotype, recent sleep and, where feasible, core temperature; and (iv) consider mild pre-heating or time-restricted feeding as physiological primers. By viewing Borbély's two-process model and allied metabolic clocks as adjustable knobs for plasticity engineering, this review provides a conceptual scaffold for personalised, time-sensitive tDCS protocols that could improve reproducibility in research and therapeutic gain in the clinic.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)能够以极性特异性方式调节皮层兴奋性,但相同的方案在不同疗程或个体间常常产生不一致的结果。本叙述性综述提出,这种变异性很大程度上源于大脑内在的时间格局。整合来自生物钟学、睡眠研究和非侵入性脑刺激的证据,我们认为tDCS仅在昼夜节律 - 内稳态“疗效窗口”内产生可靠的、极性特异性的后效应。在昼夜节律(C过程)轴上,内在警觉性、膜去极化和谷氨酸能增益在生物早晨后期和傍晚早期升高,而黎明前阶段的特点是兴奋性降低和抑制增强。在内稳态(S过程)轴上,巩固的睡眠使突触权重重新正常化,扩大了进一步增强的能力,而长时间清醒会使可塑性饱和,甚至可能逆转通常的阳极/阴极极性规则。人体刺激研究反映了这种双过程特征:睡眠剥夺消除了阳极长期增强样效应,并将阴极抑制转化为易化,而在每个参与者的生物钟类型对齐(相位对齐)的峰值时间进行刺激,即使在相同的睡眠压力下也能放大和延长后效应。从这些观察结果中我们得出了实际建议:(i)在恢复性睡眠后且接近个体清醒维持区安排兴奋性tDCS;(ii)避免在高睡眠压力或昼夜节律低谷期进行疗程;(iii)记录褪黑素相位、生物钟类型、近期睡眠情况,并在可行时记录核心体温;(iv)将轻度预热或限时进食视为生理启动因素。通过将博尔贝利的双过程模型和相关代谢时钟视为可塑性工程的可调旋钮,本综述为个性化、时间敏感的tDCS方案提供了一个概念框架,这可能会提高研究中的可重复性以及临床治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验