Suppr超能文献

与神经刺激相比,超声引导可提高连续腘窝坐骨神经阻滞的效果。

Ultrasound guidance improves a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block when compared with nerve stimulation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):181-4. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e31820d421f.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Continuous sciatic nerve blockade at the popliteal level effectively alleviates postoperative pain after major foot and ankle surgery. No randomized controlled trials have previously compared the success rate of continuous sciatic nerve sensory blockade between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that ultrasound-guided catheter placement improves the success rate of continuous sciatic nerve sensory blockade compared with catheter placement with nerve stimulation guidance.

METHODS

After research ethics committee approval and informed consent, 100 patients scheduled for elective major foot and ankle surgery were randomly allocated to popliteal catheter placement either with ultrasound or nerve stimulation guidance. The primary outcome was the success rate of sensory block the first 48 postoperative hours. Successful sensory blockade was defined as sensory loss in both the tibial and common peroneal nerve territories at 1, 6, 24, and 48 hrs postoperatively.

RESULTS

The ultrasound group had significantly higher success rate of sensory block compared with the nerve stimulation group (94% versus 79%, P=0.03). Ultrasound compared with nerve stimulation guidance also entails reduced morphine consumption (median of 18 mg [range, 0-159 mg] versus 34 mg [range, 0-152 mg], respectively, P=0.02), fewer needle passes (median of 1 [range, 1-6] versus 2 [range, 1-10], respectively, P=0.0005), and greater patient satisfaction (median numeric rating scale 9 [range, 5-10] versus 8 [range, 3-10)] respectively, P=0.0006) during catheter placement.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound guidance used for sciatic catheter placement improves the success rate of sensory block, number of needle passes, patient satisfaction during catheter placement, and morphine consumption compared with nerve stimulation guidance.

摘要

背景与目的

在腘窝水平行连续坐骨神经阻滞可有效缓解足部和踝关节大手术后的术后疼痛。之前没有随机对照试验比较超声和神经刺激引导下连续坐骨神经感觉阻滞的成功率。在本研究中,我们检验了超声引导下导管置入较神经刺激引导下导管置入能提高连续坐骨神经感觉阻滞成功率的假设。

方法

在研究伦理委员会批准和知情同意后,将 100 例行择期足部和踝关节大手术的患者随机分为超声或神经刺激引导下腘窝置管。主要结局是术后 48 小时内感觉阻滞的成功率。感觉阻滞成功定义为术后 1、6、24 和 48 小时时胫神经和腓总神经区域的感觉丧失。

结果

与神经刺激组相比,超声组感觉阻滞成功率显著更高(94%比 79%,P=0.03)。与神经刺激引导相比,超声引导还可减少吗啡用量(中位数分别为 18 mg [范围,0-159 mg] 比 34 mg [范围,0-152 mg],P=0.02),减少置管时针数(中位数分别为 1 [范围,1-6] 比 2 [范围,1-10],P=0.0005),并提高患者满意度(中位数数字评分量表分别为 9 [范围,5-10] 比 8 [范围,3-10],P=0.0006)。

结论

与神经刺激引导相比,超声引导用于坐骨神经导管置入可提高感觉阻滞成功率、置管时针数、导管置入期间患者满意度,并减少吗啡用量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验