Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Institute for Occupational and Social Medicine, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb;133(2):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.07.049. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
Many patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) require systemic immunomodulating treatment to achieve adequate disease control.
We sought to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD.
A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (until June 2012). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic immunomodulating treatments for moderate-to-severe AD were included. Selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and generation of treatment recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Efficacy outcomes were clinical signs, symptoms, quality of life, and the course of AD. Safety data were compared by calculating the weekly incidence rates (as percentages) for adverse events.
Thirty-four RCTs with 12 different systemic treatments and totaling 1653 patients were included. Fourteen trials consistently indicate that cyclosporin A efficaciously improves clinical signs of AD. Cyclosporin A is recommended as first-line treatment for short-term use. A second-line treatment option is azathioprine, but efficacy is lower, and evidence is weaker. Methotrexate can be considered a third-line treatment option. Recommendations are impossible for mycophenolate, montelukast, intravenous immunoglobulins, and systemic glucocorticosteroids because of limited evidence. A meta-analysis was not performed because of a lack of standardization in outcome measures.
Although 12 different interventions for moderate-to-severe AD have been studied in 34 RCTs, strong recommendations are only possible for the short-term use of cyclosporin A. Methodological limitations in the majority of trials prevent evidence-based conclusions. Large head-to-head trials evaluating long-term treatments are required.
许多中重度特应性皮炎(AD)患者需要全身免疫调节治疗以实现充分的疾病控制。
我们旨在系统评估中重度 AD 的全身治疗方法的疗效和安全性。
我们对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL(截至 2012 年 6 月)进行了系统文献检索。纳入了评估中重度 AD 的全身免疫调节治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名评审员独立进行选择、数据提取、质量评估和使用推荐分级的评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法生成治疗建议。疗效结局为临床体征、症状、生活质量和 AD 病程。通过计算不良反应的每周发生率(以百分比表示)来比较安全性数据。
纳入了 34 项 RCT 和 12 种不同的全身治疗方法,共 1653 名患者。14 项试验一致表明环孢素 A 能有效改善 AD 的临床体征。环孢素 A 推荐作为短期治疗的一线药物。阿扎胞苷是二线治疗选择,但疗效较低,证据较弱。甲氨蝶呤可作为三线治疗选择。由于证据有限,无法对霉酚酸酯、孟鲁司特、静脉用免疫球蛋白和全身皮质类固醇作出推荐。由于缺乏标准化的结局指标,因此无法进行荟萃分析。
尽管 34 项 RCT 研究了 12 种不同的中重度 AD 干预措施,但只有环孢素 A 的短期使用可以给出强烈的推荐。大多数试验的方法学局限性阻止了基于证据的结论。需要开展评估长期治疗的大型头对头试验。