Lunn Michael P T, Hughes Richard A C, Wiffen Philip J
Department of Neurology and MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK, WC1N 3BG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 3;2014(1):CD007115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007115.pub3.
Duloxetine is a balanced serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor licensed for the treatment of major depressive disorders, urinary stress incontinence and the management of neuropathic pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. A number of trials have been conducted to investigate the use of duloxetine in neuropathic and nociceptive painful conditions. This is the first update of a review first published in 2010.
To assess the benefits and harms of duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy and different types of chronic pain.
On 19th November 2013, we searched The Cochrane Neuromuscular Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, DARE, HTA, NHSEED, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing trials in April 2013. We also searched the reference lists of identified publications for trials of duloxetine for the treatment of painful peripheral neuropathy or chronic pain.
We selected all randomised or quasi-randomised trials of any formulation of duloxetine, used for the treatment of painful peripheral neuropathy or chronic pain in adults.
We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.
We identified 18 trials, which included 6407 participants. We found 12 of these studies in the literature search for this update. Eight studies included a total of 2728 participants with painful diabetic neuropathy and six studies involved 2249 participants with fibromyalgia. Three studies included participants with depression and painful physical symptoms and one included participants with central neuropathic pain. Studies were mostly at low risk of bias, although significant drop outs, imputation methods and almost every study being performed or sponsored by the drug manufacturer add to the risk of bias in some domains. Duloxetine at 60 mg daily is effective in treating painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the short term, with a risk ratio (RR) for ≥ 50% pain reduction at 12 weeks of 1.73 (95% CI 1.44 to 2.08). The related NNTB is 5 (95% CI 4 to 7). Duloxetine at 60 mg daily is also effective for fibromyalgia over 12 weeks (RR for ≥ 50% reduction in pain 1.57, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.06; NNTB 8, 95% CI 4 to 21) and over 28 weeks (RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.27) as well as for painful physical symptoms in depression (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.59; NNTB 8, 95% CI 5 to 14). There was no effect on central neuropathic pain in a single, small, high quality trial. In all conditions, adverse events were common in both treatment and placebo arms but more common in the treatment arm, with a dose-dependent effect. Most adverse effects were minor, but 16% of participants stopped the drug due to adverse effects. Serious adverse events were rare.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is adequate amounts of moderate quality evidence from eight studies performed by the manufacturers of duloxetine that doses of 60 mg and 120 mg daily are efficacious for treating pain in diabetic peripheral neuropathy but lower daily doses are not. Further trials are not required. In fibromyalgia, there is lower quality evidence that duloxetine is effective at similar doses to those used in diabetic peripheral neuropathy and with a similar magnitude of effect. The effect in fibromyalgia may be achieved through a greater improvement in mental symptoms than in somatic physical pain. There is low to moderate quality evidence that pain relief is also achieved in pain associated with depressive symptoms, but the NNTB of 8 in fibromyalgia and depression is not an indication of substantial efficacy. More trials (preferably independent investigator led studies) in these indications are required to reach an optimal information size to make convincing determinations of efficacy.Minor side effects are common and more common with duloxetine 60 mg and particularly with 120 mg daily, than 20 mg daily, but serious side effects are rare.Improved direct comparisons of duloxetine with other antidepressants and with other drugs, such as pregabalin, that have already been shown to be efficacious in neuropathic pain would be appropriate. Unbiased economic comparisons would further help decision making, but no high quality study includes economic data.
度洛西汀是一种5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取平衡抑制剂,已获许可用于治疗重度抑郁症、压力性尿失禁以及与糖尿病周围神经病变相关的神经性疼痛。已开展多项试验以研究度洛西汀在神经性疼痛和伤害性疼痛病症中的应用。这是对2010年首次发表的一篇综述的首次更新。
评估度洛西汀治疗疼痛性神经病变和不同类型慢性疼痛的获益与危害。
2013年11月19日,我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉疾病专业注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、英国卫生经济数据库、英国卫生技术评估数据库、英国国家卫生服务电子图书馆、医学索引数据库和荷兰医学文摘数据库。2013年4月,我们在ClinicalTrials.gov上检索了正在进行的试验。我们还检索了已识别出版物的参考文献列表,以查找度洛西汀治疗疼痛性周围神经病变或慢性疼痛的试验。
我们纳入了所有使用任何度洛西汀制剂治疗成人疼痛性周围神经病变或慢性疼痛的随机或半随机试验。
我们采用了Cochrane协作网预期的标准方法程序。
我们识别出18项试验,共纳入6407名参与者。在本次更新的文献检索中,我们找到了其中12项研究。8项研究共纳入2728名糖尿病性疼痛性神经病变患者,6项研究纳入2249名纤维肌痛患者。3项研究纳入伴有疼痛性躯体症状的抑郁症患者,1项研究纳入中枢性神经病变疼痛患者。尽管存在显著失访、插补方法以及几乎每项研究均由药品制造商开展或赞助等情况增加了某些领域的偏倚风险,但研究大多偏倚风险较低。每日60毫克度洛西汀在短期内有效治疗糖尿病性疼痛性周围神经病变,12周时疼痛减轻≥50%的风险比(RR)为1.73(95%CI 1.44至2.08)。相应的需治疗人数为5(95%CI 4至7)。每日60毫克度洛西汀在12周内对纤维肌痛也有效(疼痛减轻≥50%的RR为1.57,95%CI 1.20至2.06;需治疗人数为8,95%CI 4至21),在28周内同样有效(RR为1.58,95%CI 1.10至2.27),对伴有疼痛性躯体症状的抑郁症也有效(RR为1.37,95%CI 1.19至1.59;需治疗人数为8,95%CI 5至14)。在一项小型高质量试验中,度洛西汀对中枢性神经病变疼痛无效。在所有病症中,治疗组和安慰剂组的不良事件均常见,但治疗组更常见,且存在剂量依赖性效应。大多数不良反应轻微,但16%的参与者因不良反应而停药。严重不良事件罕见。
度洛西汀制造商开展的8项研究提供了足够数量的中等质量证据,表明每日60毫克和120毫克的剂量对治疗糖尿病性周围神经病变疼痛有效,但较低的每日剂量无效。无需进一步试验。在纤维肌痛方面,有质量较低的证据表明度洛西汀在与糖尿病性周围神经病变相似的剂量下有效,且效果程度相似。纤维肌痛中的效果可能是通过精神症状的改善大于躯体疼痛的改善而实现的。有低至中等质量的证据表明,与抑郁症状相关的疼痛也能缓解,但纤维肌痛和抑郁症中需治疗人数为8并不表明有显著疗效。在这些适应症中需要更多试验(最好由独立研究者主导的研究)以达到最佳样本量,从而令人信服地确定疗效。轻微副作用常见,每日60毫克尤其是120毫克度洛西汀比每日20毫克更常见,但严重副作用罕见。将度洛西汀与其他抗抑郁药以及其他已被证明对神经性疼痛有效的药物(如普瑞巴林)进行更好的直接比较是合适的。无偏倚的经济学比较将进一步有助于决策,但没有高质量研究包含经济学数据。