Baker International Diabetes Institute (IDI) Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Center for Renal Translational Medicine, Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, Institute of Metabolomic Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, California, USA.
Kidney Int. 2016 Aug;90(2):272-279. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.02.043. Epub 2016 May 20.
The paradigm that high glucose drives overproduction of superoxide from mitochondria as a unifying theory to explain end organ damage in diabetes complications has been tightly held for more than a decade. With the recent development of techniques and probes to measure the production of distinct reactive oxygen species (ROS) in vivo, this widely held dogma is now being challenged with the emerging view that specific ROS moieties are essential for the function of specific intracellular signaling pathways and represent normal mitochondrial function. This review will provide a balanced overview of the dual nature of ROS, detailing current evidence for ROS overproduction in diabetic kidney disease, with a focus on cell types and sources of ROS. The technical aspects of measurement of mitochondrial ROS, both in isolated mitochondria and emerging in vivo methods will be discussed. The counterargument, that mitochondrial ROS production is reduced in diabetic complications, is consistent with a growing recognition that stimulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation activity reduces inflammation and fibrosis. It is clear that there is an urgent need to fully characterize ROS production paying particular attention to spatiotemporal aspects and to factor in the relevance of ROS in the regulation of cellular signaling in the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease. With improved tools and real-time imaging capacity, a greater understanding of the complex role of ROS will be able to guide novel therapeutic regimens.
十多年来,高血糖导致线粒体中超氧化物产生过多的观点一直被认为是解释糖尿病并发症终末器官损伤的统一理论。随着近年来技术和探针的发展,这些技术和探针可以测量体内不同活性氧(ROS)的产生,这种被广泛接受的观点现在正受到挑战,新出现的观点认为,特定的 ROS 部分对于特定细胞内信号通路的功能至关重要,代表着正常的线粒体功能。这篇综述将对 ROS 的双重性质进行平衡概述,详细介绍糖尿病肾病中 ROS 过度产生的现有证据,重点关注 ROS 的细胞类型和来源。还将讨论测量线粒体 ROS 的技术方面,包括分离线粒体和新兴的体内方法。反方观点认为,糖尿病并发症中的线粒体 ROS 产生减少,这与越来越多的认识一致,即刺激线粒体生物发生和氧化磷酸化活性可减少炎症和纤维化。显然,我们迫切需要充分表征 ROS 的产生,特别要注意时空方面,并考虑 ROS 在调节糖尿病肾病发病机制中细胞信号的相关性。随着工具的改进和实时成像能力的提高,我们将能够更好地理解 ROS 的复杂作用,并指导新的治疗方案。