Li Xin, Liu Zizhong, Liu Houfang, Chen Xi, Liu Yue, Tan Honglue
Department of Dermatology, The Fourth Hospital of Zhenjiang, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, P.R. China.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henan Orthopedic Hospital, Luoyang Orthopedic‑Traumatological Hospital, Luoyang, Henan 471002, P.R. China.
Mol Med Rep. 2017 Apr;15(4):1816-1822. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6184. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
Treating skin and soft tissue infections of severe limb traumas can be challenging. Crucial concerns focus on inhibiting biofilm formation by antibiotic‑resistant bacteria, and preventing scar formation by fibroblastic hyperproliferation. The local use of toluidine blue O (TBO)‑mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) may be a promising strategy for treating such lesions. The present study used Staphylococcus epidermidis (strain ATCC 35984) to assess the effects of TBO‑PDT on bacterial adherence and biofilm formation, using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), tissue culture plating (TCP) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Primary human fibroblast cells were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of TBO‑PDT using the 3‑(4,5‑dimethylthiazol‑2‑yl)‑2,5‑diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and CLSM. Six different treatment groups were investigated: Medium only [tryptone soy broth (TSB) or Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)]; red light control (light dose, 30 J/cm2); TBO group (50 mM TBO); TBO‑PDT1 (TBO irradiated with 10 J/cm2); TBO‑PDT2 (TBO irradiated with 20 J/cm2); and TBO‑PDT3 (TBO irradiated with 30 J/cm2). The results of the S. epidermidis adhesion assay indicated that the TSB, light and TBO groups exhibited significant bacterial adherence, compared with the TBO‑PDT groups. Analysis of biofilm formation revealed significant light dose‑dependent differences between the TBO‑PDT groups and the TSB, light, and TBO groups. Furthermore, SEM indicated fewer colony masses in the TBO‑PDT groups compared with the control groups. The MTT assay for fibroblastic cell toxicity demonstrated ~1.1, 4.6, 14.5, 29.7 and 43.4% reduction in optical density for the light, TBO, TBO‑PDT1, TBO‑PDT2 and TBO‑PDT3 groups, respectively, compared with the DMEM control group. There was no difference in toxicity between the light and control groups, however, there were significant differences among the TBO‑PDT groups. Finally, alterations in fibroblast morphology and cell spreading were revealed by CLSM, following TBO‑PDT treatment. TBO‑PDT inhibited bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, and exhibited significant cytotoxic effects on human fibroblasts. These results indicate that the local use of TBO‑PDT in limb lesions may be a useful treatment method for inhibiting bacterial biofilm formation and fibroblastic hyperproliferation, which may prevent infectious hypertrophic scar formation.
治疗严重肢体创伤的皮肤和软组织感染具有挑战性。关键问题集中在抑制耐药细菌形成生物膜,以及防止成纤维细胞过度增殖形成瘢痕。局部使用甲苯胺蓝O(TBO)介导的光动力疗法(PDT)可能是治疗此类损伤的一种有前景的策略。本研究使用表皮葡萄球菌(菌株ATCC 35984),通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)、组织培养平板法(TCP)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估TBO-PDT对细菌黏附和生物膜形成的影响。使用原代人成纤维细胞,通过3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(MTT)法和CLSM评估TBO-PDT的细胞毒性。研究了六个不同的治疗组:仅培养基组[胰蛋白胨大豆肉汤(TSB)或杜氏改良伊格尔培养基(DMEM)];红光对照组(光剂量,30 J/cm²);TBO组(50 mM TBO);TBO-PDT1组(用10 J/cm²照射TBO);TBO-PDT2组(用20 J/cm²照射TBO);以及TBO-PDT3组(用30 J/cm²照射TBO)。表皮葡萄球菌黏附试验结果表明,与TBO-PDT组相比,TSB组、光照组和TBO组表现出显著的细菌黏附。生物膜形成分析显示,TBO-PDT组与TSB组、光照组和TBO组之间存在显著的光剂量依赖性差异。此外,SEM显示TBO-PDT组的菌落团块比对照组少。成纤维细胞毒性的MTT试验表明,与DMEM对照组相比,光照组、TBO组、TBO-PDT1组、TBO-PDT2组和TBO-PDT3组的光密度分别降低了约1.1%、4.6%、14.5%、29.7%和43.4%。光照组和对照组之间的毒性没有差异,然而,TBO-PDT组之间存在显著差异。最后,CLSM显示TBO-PDT处理后成纤维细胞形态和细胞铺展发生改变。TBO-PDT抑制细菌黏附和生物膜形成,并对人成纤维细胞表现出显著的细胞毒性作用。这些结果表明,在肢体损伤中局部使用TBO-PDT可能是一种有用的治疗方法,可抑制细菌生物膜形成和成纤维细胞过度增殖,从而可能预防感染性肥厚性瘢痕形成。