Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物药物警戒:同时患有慢性非癌痛和物质使用障碍的患者阿片类药物处方变化的临床-社会史。

Opioid pharmacovigilance: A clinical-social history of the changes in opioid prescribing for patients with co-occurring chronic non-cancer pain and substance use.

机构信息

University of California - San Francisco, United States.

University of California - San Francisco, United States.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;186:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.043. Epub 2017 May 23.

Abstract

There is growing concern among US-based clinicians, patients, policy makers, and in the media about the personal and community health risks associated with opioids. Perceptions about the efficacy and appropriateness of opioids for the management of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) have dramatically transformed in recent decades. Yet, there is very little social scientific research identifying the factors that have informed this transformation from the perspectives of prescribing clinicians. As part of an on-going ethnographic study of CNCP management among clinicians and their patients with co-occurring substance use, we interviewed 23 primary care clinicians who practice in safety-net clinical settings. In this paper, we describe the clinical and social influences informing three historic periods: (1) the escalation of opioid prescriptions for CNCP; (2) an interim period in which the efficacy of and risks associated with opioids were re-assessed; and (3) the current period of "opioid pharmacovigilance," characterized by the increased surveillance of opioid prescriptions. Clinicians reported that interpretations of the evidence-base in favor of and opposing opioid prescribing for CNCP evolved within a larger clinical-social context. Historically, pharmaceutical marketing efforts and clinicians' concerns about racialized healthcare disparities in pain treatment influenced opioid prescription decision-making. Clinicians emphasized how patients' medical complexity (e.g. multiple chronic health conditions) and structural vulnerability (e.g. poverty, community violence) impacted access to opioids within resource-limited healthcare settings. This clinical-social history of opioid prescribing practices helps to elucidate the ongoing challenges of CNCP treatment in the US healthcare safety net and lends needed specificity to the broader, nationwide conversation about opioids.

摘要

美国的临床医生、患者、政策制定者和媒体越来越关注与阿片类药物相关的个人和社区健康风险。在过去几十年中,人们对阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)的疗效和适宜性的看法发生了巨大变化。然而,几乎没有社会科学研究从处方医生的角度确定促成这种转变的因素。作为对临床医生及其同时患有物质使用障碍的 CNCP 患者进行 CNCP 管理的一项正在进行的民族志研究的一部分,我们采访了 23 名在安全网临床环境中执业的初级保健临床医生。在本文中,我们描述了影响三个历史时期的临床和社会影响:(1)CNCP 阿片类药物处方的增加;(2)重新评估阿片类药物的疗效和相关风险的中间时期;(3)“阿片类药物药物警戒”的当前时期,其特点是增加了对阿片类药物处方的监测。临床医生报告说,支持和反对 CNCP 阿片类药物处方的证据基础的解释在更大的临床社会背景下演变。从历史上看,制药营销工作和临床医生对疼痛治疗中种族化医疗保健差异的关注影响了阿片类药物处方决策。临床医生强调了患者的医疗复杂性(例如多种慢性健康状况)和结构脆弱性(例如贫困、社区暴力)如何影响资源有限的医疗保健环境中获得阿片类药物的机会。这种阿片类药物处方实践的临床社会历史有助于阐明美国医疗保健安全网中 CNCP 治疗的持续挑战,并为更广泛的全国范围内关于阿片类药物的对话提供必要的具体内容。

相似文献

2
Sources and Impact of Time Pressure on Opioid Management in the Safety-Net.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun;32(3):375-382. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180306.
3
Patients' and clinicians' perspectives of co-use of cannabis and opioids for chronic non-cancer pain management in primary care.
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Jan;63:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
6
Multimodal Local Opioid Prescribing Intervention Outcomes in Chronic Noncancer Pain Management.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):559-566. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180296.
9
Cohort protocol paper: the Pain and Opioids In Treatment (POINT) study.
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Mar 20;15:17. doi: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Rise of Clinical Decision Support Algorithms in Pain Management 2009-2024.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09600-9.
3
"I'm just searching to get better": Constructions of treatment citizenship on injectable opioid agonist treatment.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 May;348:116708. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116708. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
5
The Clinical Evolutions of Surveillance and Violence During Three Contemporary US Crises: Opioid Overdose, COVID-19, and Racial Reckoning.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2024 Sep;48(3):470-487. doi: 10.1007/s11013-023-09842-4. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
6
Examining Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in the Treatment of Pain and Injury Emergencies.
HCA Healthc J Med. 2022 Jun 28;3(3):111-118. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1425. eCollection 2022.
8
Socio-historical analysis of the social importance of pharmacovigilance.
Front Sociol. 2022 Nov 25;7:974090. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.974090. eCollection 2022.
9
The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.
Can J Pain. 2022 Sep 1;6(1):142-170. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2104699. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The risks of opioid treatment: Perspectives of primary care practitioners and patients from safety-net clinics.
Subst Abus. 2017 Apr-Jun;38(2):213-221. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2017.1296524. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
2
Opioid-Prescribing Patterns of Emergency Physicians and Risk of Long-Term Use.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):663-673. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1610524.
3
Provider Experiences With the Identification, Management, and Treatment of Co-occurring Chronic Noncancer Pain and Substance Use in the Safety Net.
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jan 28;52(2):251-255. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1223138. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
4
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain--United States, 2016.
JAMA. 2016 Apr 19;315(15):1624-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1464.
5
Circumstances and contexts of heroin initiation following non-medical opioid analgesic use in New York City.
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Feb;28:106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.021. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
Correlates and Consequences of Opioid Misuse among High-Risk Young Adults.
J Addict. 2014;2014:156954. doi: 10.1155/2014/156954. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
8
The dueling obligations of opioid stewardship.
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 4;160(3):207. doi: 10.7326/M13-2781.
9
The 'worthy' patient: rethinking the 'hidden curriculum' in medical education.
Anthropol Med. 2013 Apr;20(1):13-23. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2012.747595.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验