Lung Clinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno-Infantil de Gran Canaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;37(7):537-546. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00149. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
In the randomized, open-label, phase III KEYNOTE-024 study, pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater and without EGFR/ALK aberrations. We report an updated OS and tolerability analysis, including analyses adjusting for potential bias introduced by crossover from chemotherapy to pembrolizumab.
Patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (for up to 2 years) or investigator's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). Patients assigned to chemotherapy could cross over to pembrolizumab upon meeting eligibility criteria. The primary end point was progression-free survival; OS was an important key secondary end point. Crossover adjustment analysis was done using the following three methods: simplified two-stage method, rank-preserving structural failure time, and inverse probability of censoring weighting.
Three hundred five patients were randomly assigned (pembrolizumab, n = 154; chemotherapy, n = 151). At data cutoff (July 10, 2017; median follow-up, 25.2 months), 73 patients in the pembrolizumab arm and 96 in the chemotherapy arm had died. Median OS was 30.0 months (95% CI, 18.3 months to not reached) with pembrolizumab and 14.2 months (95% CI, 9.8 to 19.0 months) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.86). Eighty-two patients assigned to chemotherapy crossed over on study to receive pembrolizumab. When adjusted for crossover using the two-stage method, the hazard ratio for OS for pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.69); results using rank-preserving structural failure time and inverse probability of censoring weighting were similar. Treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events were less frequent with pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy (31.2% v 53.3%, respectively).
With prolonged follow-up, first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy continues to demonstrate an OS benefit over chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK aberrations, despite crossover from the control arm to pembrolizumab as subsequent therapy.
在这项随机、开放标签、III 期 KEYNOTE-024 研究中,与基于铂类的化疗相比,帕博利珠单抗在先前未经治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中显示出了显著的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)改善,这些患者的程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)肿瘤比例评分≥50%,且不存在表皮生长因子受体[EGFR]或间变性淋巴瘤激酶[ALK]异常。我们报告了一项 OS 和耐受性的更新分析,包括调整交叉治疗(从化疗转为帕博利珠单抗)引起的潜在偏倚的分析。
患者被随机分配接受帕博利珠单抗 200 mg,每 3 周 1 次(最长 2 年)或研究者选择的基于铂类的化疗(4 至 6 个周期)。被分配接受化疗的患者在符合入组标准后可以交叉使用帕博利珠单抗。主要终点为 PFS;OS 是一个重要的次要关键终点。使用以下三种方法进行交叉调整分析:简化两阶段法、秩保持结构失效时间法和逆概率 censoring 加权法。
305 例患者被随机分配(帕博利珠单抗组,n=154;化疗组,n=151)。在数据截止(2017 年 7 月 10 日;中位随访时间,25.2 个月)时,帕博利珠单抗组有 73 例患者和化疗组有 96 例患者死亡。帕博利珠单抗组的中位 OS 为 30.0 个月(95%CI,18.3 个月至未达到),化疗组为 14.2 个月(95%CI,9.8 个月至 19.0 个月)(风险比[HR],0.63;95%CI,0.47 至 0.86)。82 例被分配接受化疗的患者在研究中交叉使用帕博利珠单抗。使用两阶段法进行交叉调整时,帕博利珠单抗与化疗相比,OS 的 HR 为 0.49(95%CI,0.34 至 0.69);使用秩保持结构失效时间法和逆概率 censoring 加权法的结果相似。与化疗相比,帕博利珠单抗治疗相关的 3 级至 5 级不良事件发生率较低(分别为 31.2%和 53.3%)。
在随访时间延长的情况下,与化疗相比,在先前未经治疗的、无 EGFR/ALK 异常的晚期 NSCLC 患者中,一线帕博利珠单抗单药治疗继续显示出 OS 获益,尽管有患者从对照组交叉到帕博利珠单抗作为后续治疗。