Division of Cancer Medicine.
Department of Hematopathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine.
Blood Adv. 2020 Apr 14;4(7):1311-1320. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001267.
Nucleophosmin-1 mutations (NPM1+) occur in ∼30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Although typically associated with favorable prognosis, the beneficial impact of NPM1+ decreases with increasing age in patients treated with standard intensive chemotherapy (IC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs). This retrospective analysis compared outcomes of NPM1+ AML patients treated with 1 of 3 induction approaches: HMA plus BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN), HMA, or IC therapy. Composite complete response (CRc: CR + CR with incomplete count recovery) was seen in 96% (27/28), 36% (17/47), and 89% (204/228) of HMA + VEN, HMA, and IC patients, respectively (HMA + VEN vs HMA, P < .001; HMA + VEN vs IC, P = .10). Older patients (age >65 years) treated with HMA + VEN, HMA, or IC had CR rates of 88%, 28%, and 56%, respectively (HMA + VEN vs HMA, P < .001; HMA + VEN vs IC, P = .01). Significant improvement in overall survival (OS) was seen in patients age >65 years treated with HMA + VEN vs HMA (not reached [NR] vs 0.4 years; P < .001) or IC (NR vs 0.93 years; P = .001). Older patients treated with HMA + VEN had OS of 80% after median 1-year follow-up, with estimated 2-year OS of 70%. In the multivariable Cox model analysis, HMA + VEN was associated with a 69% lower risk of death compared with IC (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.83; type I error-adjusted P = .038). HMA + VEN combinations demonstrated impressive results compared with traditional standard-of-care regimens in older patients with NPM1+ AML.
核仁磷酸蛋白 1 突变(NPM1+)发生在约 30%的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者中。尽管通常与良好的预后相关,但在接受标准强化化疗(IC)或低甲基化剂(HMAs)治疗的患者中,NPM1+的有益影响随着年龄的增加而降低。这项回顾性分析比较了接受以下 3 种诱导方法之一治疗的 NPM1+AML 患者的结局:HMAs 联合 BCL-2 抑制剂 venetoclax(VEN)、HMAs 或 IC 治疗。HMA+VEN、HMA 和 IC 组患者的复合完全缓解率(CRc:完全缓解+不完全计数恢复的 CR)分别为 96%(27/28)、36%(17/47)和 89%(204/228)(HMA+VEN 与 HMA 相比,P<0.001;HMA+VEN 与 IC 相比,P=0.10)。接受 HMA+VEN、HMA 或 IC 治疗的老年患者(年龄>65 岁)的 CR 率分别为 88%、28%和 56%(HMA+VEN 与 HMA 相比,P<0.001;HMA+VEN 与 IC 相比,P=0.01)。在接受 HMA+VEN 治疗的>65 岁患者中,与接受 HMA 或 IC 治疗的患者相比,总生存期(OS)显著改善(未达到[NR]与 0.4 年;P<0.001)。在多变量 Cox 模型分析中,与 IC 相比,HMA+VEN 治疗与死亡风险降低 69%相关(风险比,0.31;95%置信区间,0.12-0.83;经类型 I 错误校正的 P=0.038)。与传统的标准治疗方案相比,HMA+VEN 联合方案在 NPM1+AML 的老年患者中显示出令人印象深刻的结果。