Silano Vittorio, Barat Baviera José Manuel, Bolognesi Claudia, Chesson Andrew, Cocconcelli Pier Sandro, Crebelli Riccardo, Gott David Michael, Grob Konrad, Lampi Evgenia, Mortensen Alicja, Rivière Gilles, Steffensen Inger-Lise, Tlustos Christina, Van Loveren Henk, Vernis Laurence, Zorn Holger, Cravedi Jean-Pierre, Fortes Cristina, Tavares Poças Maria de Fatima, Waalkens-Berendsen Ine, Wölfle Detlef, Arcella Davide, Cascio Claudia, Castoldi Anna F, Volk Katharina, Castle Laurence
EFSA J. 2019 Dec 11;17(12):e05838. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5838. eCollection 2019 Dec.
The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP Panel) was asked by the European Commission to update its 2005 risk assessments of di-butylphthalate (DBP), butyl-benzyl-phthalate (BBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), di-isononylphthalate (DINP) and di-isodecylphthalate (DIDP), which are authorised for use in plastic food contact material (FCM). Dietary exposure estimates (mean and high (P95)) were obtained by combining literature occurrence data with consumption data from the EFSA Comprehensive Database. The highest exposure was found for DINP, ranging from 0.2 to 4.3 and from 0.4 to 7.0 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day for mean and high consumers, respectively. There was not enough information to draw conclusions on how much migration from plastic FCM contributes to dietary exposure to phthalates. The review of the toxicological data focused mainly on reproductive effects. The CEP Panel derived the same critical effects and individual tolerable daily intakes (TDIs) (mg/kg bw per day) as in 2005 for all the phthalates, i.e. reproductive effects for DBP (0.01), BBP (0.5), DEHP (0.05), and liver effects for DINP and DIDP (0.15 each). Based on a plausible common mechanism (i.e. reduction in fetal testosterone) underlying the reproductive effects of DEHP, DBP and BBP, the Panel considered it appropriate to establish a group-TDI for these phthalates, taking DEHP as index compound as a basis for introducing relative potency factors. The Panel noted that DINP also affected fetal testosterone levels at doses around threefold higher than liver effects and therefore considered it conservative to include it within the group-TDI which was established to be 50 μg/kg bw per day, expressed as DEHP equivalents. The aggregated dietary exposure for DBP, BBP, DEHP and DINP was estimated to be 0.9-7.2 and 1.6-11.7 μg/kg bw per day for mean and high consumers, respectively, thus contributing up to 23% of the group-TDI in the worst-case scenario. For DIDP, not included in the group-TDI, dietary exposure was estimated to be always below 0.1 μg/kg bw per day and therefore far below the TDI of 150 μg/kg bw per day. This assessment covers European consumers of any age, including the most sensitive groups. Based on the limited scope of the mandate and the uncertainties identified, the Panel considered that the current assessment of the five phthalates, individually and collectively, should be on a temporary basis.
应欧盟委员会要求,欧洲食品安全局食品接触材料、酶和加工助剂专家委员会(CEP专家委员会)更新了其2005年对邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸丁苄酯(BBP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)、邻苯二甲酸二异壬酯(DINP)和邻苯二甲酸二异癸酯(DIDP)的风险评估,这些物质被批准用于塑料食品接触材料(FCM)。通过将文献中这些物质的出现数据与欧洲食品安全局综合数据库中的消费数据相结合,得出了膳食暴露估计值(均值和高值(P95))。发现DINP的暴露量最高,平均消费者和高消费人群每天的暴露量分别为0.2至4.3微克/千克体重和0.4至7.0微克/千克体重。没有足够的信息来确定塑料FCM中的迁移对膳食中邻苯二甲酸酯暴露的贡献程度。毒理学数据审查主要集中在生殖影响方面。CEP专家委员会得出的关键影响和个体每日耐受摄入量(TDI)(毫克/千克体重/天)与2005年对所有邻苯二甲酸酯的评估相同,即DBP(0.01)、BBP(0.5)、DEHP(0.05)的生殖影响,以及DINP和DIDP(均为0.15)的肝脏影响。基于DEHP、DBP和BBP生殖影响背后可能存在的共同机制(即胎儿睾酮水平降低),专家委员会认为以DEHP作为指标化合物引入相对效力因子来为这些邻苯二甲酸酯确定一个组TDI是合适的。专家委员会指出,DINP在剂量约为肝脏影响剂量三倍时也会影响胎儿睾酮水平,因此将其纳入设定为每天50微克/千克体重(以DEHP当量表示)的组TDI中被认为是保守的做法。DBP、BBP、DEHP和DINP的总膳食暴露估计值,平均消费者和高消费人群每天分别为0.9至7.2微克/千克体重和1.6至11.7微克/千克体重,因此在最坏情况下,这最多占组TDI的23%。对于未包含在组TDI中的DIDP,估计膳食暴露量始终低于每天0.1微克/千克体重,因此远低于每天150微克/千克体重的TDI。该评估涵盖了任何年龄的欧洲消费者,包括最敏感的群体。基于任务范围有限以及所确定的不确定性,专家委员会认为目前对这五种邻苯二甲酸酯单独和总体的评估应是临时性的。